Pricing Derivatives with Smarter Labels

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A novel machine learning approach leveraging likelihood ratios significantly improves the accuracy of financial derivative pricing, particularly for complex contracts.

Predicted option prices, determined through standard, pathwise differential, and LRM differential training-each assessed with a dataset of 512 labels-demonstrate the efficacy of these training methods in approximating target prices.
Predicted option prices, determined through standard, pathwise differential, and LRM differential training-each assessed with a dataset of 512 labels-demonstrate the efficacy of these training methods in approximating target prices.

This review demonstrates the benefits of differential labels – derived using the likelihood ratio method and pathwise derivatives – over traditional differentiation techniques, enhanced by Gamma regularization for improved stability.

Despite advances in machine learning for financial derivatives, accurate pricing and hedging of contracts with discontinuous payoffs remains a challenge. This paper, ‘Differential ML with a Difference’, addresses this limitation by investigating alternative sensitivity estimation techniques within the framework of Differential Machine Learning. Our findings demonstrate that utilizing likelihood ratio-based differential labels substantially reduces pricing and sensitivity errors, particularly for digital and barrier options. Could this approach unlock more robust and reliable machine learning models for a wider range of complex financial instruments?

The Challenge of Accurate Derivative Pricing

The foundational Black-Scholes model, while revolutionary, rests on several simplifying assumptions that hinder its application to the increasingly complex financial instruments of modern markets. This model assumes constant volatility, continuous trading, and a log-normal distribution of asset prices – conditions rarely met in reality. Consequently, pricing derivatives with features like early exercise, path dependency, or multiple underlying assets presents significant challenges. Exotic options, such as Asian or Barrier options, deviate further from these assumptions, rendering the Black-Scholes formula inaccurate and potentially misleading. The model’s inherent limitations necessitate the development of more sophisticated techniques, including Monte Carlo simulation and finite difference methods, to accurately value these complex financial products and manage the associated risks. These alternative approaches attempt to relax the restrictive assumptions of the original model, offering a more realistic, albeit computationally intensive, assessment of derivative values.

The precise valuation of derivative instruments isn’t merely an academic exercise; it forms the bedrock of effective risk management and portfolio hedging strategies. Inaccurate pricing can lead to significant underestimation of potential losses, leaving institutions vulnerable to market fluctuations and systemic shocks. Consequently, financial institutions are continually seeking more robust valuation methods that move beyond the limitations of traditional models. These advanced techniques, often involving Monte Carlo simulations or sophisticated numerical algorithms, aim to capture the complex interplay of factors influencing derivative values, allowing for a more realistic assessment of exposure and enabling proactive mitigation of financial risk. The pursuit of accurate pricing, therefore, isn’t about achieving theoretical perfection, but about safeguarding financial stability and fostering a resilient economic system.

The valuation of path-dependent options, such as Digital and Barrier options, presents a significant computational challenge that traditional analytical solutions often cannot overcome. Unlike standard European options where the payoff depends solely on the asset price at expiration, these complex instruments have payoffs contingent on the entire price path taken during the option’s life. This necessitates the use of computationally intensive methods like Monte Carlo simulation, where a large number of possible price paths are generated to estimate the expected payoff. Each path requires calculating the option’s payoff at various points in time, and then averaging across all simulated paths to arrive at a fair price. The accuracy of the pricing is directly related to the number of paths simulated – higher accuracy demands exponentially more computational resources, creating a substantial burden for both calibration and real-time risk management. Consequently, efficient algorithms and high-performance computing infrastructure are critical for effectively pricing and hedging these increasingly prevalent derivative products.

Derivative-regularized methods, particularly PW-LR, demonstrably reduce root mean squared error in estimating portfolio gamma compared to standard machine learning approaches.
Derivative-regularized methods, particularly PW-LR, demonstrably reduce root mean squared error in estimating portfolio gamma compared to standard machine learning approaches.

Machine Learning as a Derivative Approximation Tool

Traditional derivative pricing relies heavily on mathematical models with closed-form solutions, such as the Black-Scholes model. However, many complex financial instruments lack such analytical solutions, requiring computationally intensive methods like Monte Carlo simulation. Machine learning offers an alternative by approximating the relationship between input parameters – including the underlying asset price, strike price, time to maturity, interest rates, and volatility – and the derivative’s price. This is achieved by training a model on a dataset of known input-output pairs, effectively learning a function that maps inputs to prices without requiring explicit derivation of a mathematical formula. This approach provides flexibility in modeling complex payoffs and can potentially reduce computational time compared to traditional numerical methods, particularly for high-dimensional problems or real-time pricing applications.

Neural networks function as universal approximators, enabling the estimation of derivative pricing functions without explicit analytical solutions. The core principle involves training an artificial neural network – typically a multi-layer perceptron or a more complex architecture – on a dataset of input parameters, such as underlying asset price, strike price, time to maturity, and volatility, paired with their corresponding option prices. This training process adjusts the network’s internal weights and biases via algorithms like backpropagation to minimize the difference between predicted and actual option prices. The resulting trained network then represents a learned mapping, $f(x)$, where $x$ represents the input parameters and $f(x)$ outputs the estimated option price. The network’s capacity to accurately represent this mapping is dependent on network architecture, the size and quality of the training data, and the chosen training parameters.

Current machine learning implementations for derivative pricing frequently prioritize accurate price prediction as the primary objective, often overlooking the calculation of Greeks – sensitivity measures like Delta and Gamma. While a model may accurately predict the price of an option, it fails to provide crucial information regarding the option’s exposure to changes in underlying parameters. Delta, representing the rate of change of the option price with respect to the underlying asset’s price, and Gamma, the rate of change of Delta, are essential for risk management, hedging strategies, and portfolio optimization. Neglecting these sensitivities limits the practical utility of the model beyond simple price discovery, as traders and risk managers require a comprehensive understanding of the derivative’s behavior under various market conditions. Calculating and incorporating these sensitivities into the training process is therefore critical for creating a fully functional and robust derivative pricing model.

Training with standard, pathwise, or learned random mappings (LRM) achieves similar accuracy in predicting barrier option prices, as measured by root mean squared error (RMSE) from averaged predictions across 10 replications using a training sample of 1024.
Training with standard, pathwise, or learned random mappings (LRM) achieves similar accuracy in predicting barrier option prices, as measured by root mean squared error (RMSE) from averaged predictions across 10 replications using a training sample of 1024.

Differential Machine Learning: Beyond Price Prediction

Differential Machine Learning (DML) represents a departure from conventional machine learning approaches in financial modeling by explicitly integrating price sensitivity into the model training process. Traditional machine learning typically focuses on predicting a single value, such as an option price. DML, however, modifies the training objective to incorporate the rate of change of the option price with respect to underlying parameters – effectively training the model to understand how the price changes, not just what the price is. This is achieved by treating price sensitivity – often represented as the Greeks in option pricing – as a target variable during training, alongside the option price itself. Consequently, the neural network learns to approximate both the price function and its derivatives simultaneously, enabling more accurate and robust predictions, especially in scenarios involving parameter perturbations or hedging strategies.

Differential labels, crucial for training differential machine learning models, are generated using derivative estimation techniques such as the Pathwise Derivative and the Likelihood Ratio Method. The Pathwise Derivative directly calculates the derivative of the payoff function with respect to a parameter of interest, applying the chain rule to account for the stochastic nature of the underlying asset’s price. Conversely, the Likelihood Ratio Method estimates the derivative by comparing the probability density functions of the simulated paths under slightly perturbed parameter values. Both methods provide estimates of $ \frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta} $, where $V$ is the option price and $\theta$ is the parameter being differentiated, which are then used as labels to train the neural network to predict not just the option price, but also its sensitivity to changes in the input parameters.

By incorporating differential labels during training, the Neural Network learns to predict not only the expected option price but also the sensitivity of that price to changes in underlying parameters such as the underlying asset price, volatility, interest rates, and time to expiration. These labels effectively provide the network with gradient information, allowing it to model the relationship between input parameters and the option price, represented as partial derivatives like the ‘Greeks’ – Delta, Gamma, Vega, and Theta. This results in a model capable of simultaneously predicting option prices and their sensitivities, offering a more comprehensive and actionable output than traditional machine learning approaches focused solely on price prediction.

Monte Carlo simulation is integral to Differential Machine Learning as it provides the necessary data for estimating the partial derivatives required for training. The process involves generating a large number of random samples, or paths, representing potential future scenarios of the underlying asset. For each sample path, the payoff of the derivative is calculated, and these payoffs, along with the associated underlying parameters, are used to numerically approximate the derivatives of the option price with respect to those parameters, such as the underlying asset price or volatility. These numerically derived values then serve as the ‘differential labels’ used to train the neural network, enabling it to learn the relationship between parameter changes and resulting price changes. The accuracy of these derivative estimates, and consequently the trained network, is directly dependent on the number of samples generated and the efficiency of the Monte Carlo method employed.

Pathwise machine learning performance on a digital option is highly dependent on the smoothing parameter, as demonstrated by the averaged results of 30 replications with a training sample size of 1024.
Pathwise machine learning performance on a digital option is highly dependent on the smoothing parameter, as demonstrated by the averaged results of 30 replications with a training sample size of 1024.

Refining Accuracy: Advanced Techniques for Derivative Valuation

Calculating the precise sensitivity of an option’s price to changes in underlying variables is crucial for risk management and trading, but traditional methods struggle with options featuring discontinuous payouts, such as Digital or Barrier options. The Likelihood Ratio Method, when paired with the Euler Scheme, offers a robust solution to this challenge. This technique effectively computes the ‘differential labels’ – the local sensitivity of the option price – even when the payout structure isn’t smooth. By leveraging the principles of probability theory and numerical approximation, the method accurately traces the infinitesimal change in the option’s value resulting from a small shift in the underlying asset’s price. The Euler Scheme provides a computationally efficient way to discretize the continuous-time dynamics, allowing for a practical implementation of the Likelihood Ratio Method and enabling accurate sensitivity calculations for even the most complex option structures, where standard differentiation techniques would fail.

Automatic Adjoint Differentiation offers a computationally efficient method for determining the derivatives required within a Neural Network framework for option pricing. Unlike traditional finite difference methods which require multiple forward passes through the network for each derivative, this technique leverages the chain rule to compute gradients with a single backward pass. This dramatically reduces computational cost, particularly when calculating ‘Greeks’ – sensitivities like Delta, Gamma, and Vega – which are crucial for risk management and hedging. By automatically tracing the computational graph, the method avoids manual derivation and implementation of complex derivative formulas, streamlining the training process and enabling the efficient computation of higher-order sensitivities needed for accurate option valuation and robust model calibration. The resulting speedup is pivotal for handling complex financial instruments and large datasets, making it a cornerstone of Differential Machine Learning approaches.

Differential Machine Learning introduces a novel training paradigm that simultaneously optimizes for both the option price and its sensitivities – crucial measures of risk and exposure. This joint training process demonstrably elevates accuracy and stability, especially when valuing complex financial instruments like Digital and Barrier Options, which pose significant challenges for traditional methods. Empirical results reveal substantial improvements; specifically, the approach achieves a seven-fold reduction in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for Digital Option pricing and a six-fold decrease in Delta RMSE when contrasted with conventional pathwise methods. These gains suggest a more robust and reliable model capable of navigating the intricacies of derivative valuation and providing more precise assessments of financial risk.

The methodology consistently delivers highly accurate digital option pricing, achieving a remarkably low Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 1.01. This performance surpasses that of both conventional machine learning models and traditional pathwise methods, as evidenced by the smallest RMSE attained in Gamma estimation-a crucial metric for understanding an option’s convexity. Furthermore, the Pathwise Likelihood Ratio (PW-LR) method demonstrates improved stability and accuracy as the number of simulated sample paths increases, suggesting a robust approach to handling the complexities of financial derivatives. These results highlight the potential of this technique to provide reliable valuations, even for options with non-standard payoff structures, and offer a significant advancement in the field of computational finance.

Traditional option pricing models, such as the Bachelier model, often struggle with the intricacies of complex derivatives-those featuring multiple barriers, path dependencies, or discontinuous payouts. This new approach circumvents these limitations by directly incorporating sensitivity information-how the option price changes with respect to underlying asset movements-into the training process. By jointly optimizing for both price and these sensitivities, the model learns a more robust representation of the option’s behavior, effectively capturing nuances that simpler models miss. This results in superior performance across a range of complex option structures, demonstrating an ability to accurately price and hedge even those derivatives that pose significant challenges to conventional techniques, and offering a more adaptable framework for financial modeling.

Training with standard, pathwise, or learned risk mitigation (LRM) methods yields similar barrier option delta predictions-matching target sensitivities when averaged over replications and evaluated with root mean squared error (RMSE)-using a training sample size of 1024.
Training with standard, pathwise, or learned risk mitigation (LRM) methods yields similar barrier option delta predictions-matching target sensitivities when averaged over replications and evaluated with root mean squared error (RMSE)-using a training sample size of 1024.

The pursuit of accuracy in financial derivative pricing, as detailed in this work, echoes a fundamental principle of simplicity. The paper’s focus on the likelihood ratio method, offering improvements over pathwise differentiation-particularly for discontinuous payoffs-aligns with the idea that elegance often resides in directness. As Epicurus observed, “It is not the pursuit of pleasure itself, but the removal of pain.” Similarly, this research isn’t merely about achieving higher accuracy; it’s about removing the inaccuracies inherent in traditional methods, streamlining the process to reveal the underlying truth with greater clarity. The application of Gamma regularization further reinforces this, paring down complexity to expose the essential elements of the model.

Where Do We Go From Here?

The pursuit of derivative pricing accuracy often resembles an arms race. More parameters, more layers, more complexity – they called it ‘sophistication’ to hide the panic. This work suggests a different path: not necessarily more, but better information. The likelihood ratio method, applied to differential labels, demonstrably improves performance, particularly where traditional pathwise approaches stumble on discontinuities. But clarity, once achieved, reveals further shadows. The gamma regularization, while effective, feels… provisional. A pragmatic fix for a deeper issue concerning label noise and its propagation.

The true test lies not in pricing vanilla options, but in handling exotic contracts, those baroque financial instruments designed to test the limits of any model. There, the interaction between complex payoff structures and the inherent approximations within automatic differentiation will undoubtedly expose new vulnerabilities. One suspects the gains observed here are not merely algorithmic, but a consequence of forcing a more rigorous treatment of the underlying stochastic processes.

Future work should, therefore, focus less on chasing marginal gains in model architecture and more on the quality of the input. A return to fundamentals, if you will. Perhaps a formal exploration of the information-theoretic limits of derivative pricing, and a blunt assessment of how much accuracy is truly necessary before we all succumb to overfitting the noise.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.05301.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-08 11:55