Why U.S. SEC Chair Is Wrong When He Says “Crypto Doesn’t Have Disclosures”, Explains Crypto Entrepreneur

As an analyst with a background in both traditional finance and blockchain technology, I find Ryan Sean Adams’s perspective on the adequacy of crypto disclosures thought-provoking. Adams’s experience as a prominent crypto investor and entrepreneur provides him with unique insights into the capabilities of decentralized financial systems.


As a crypto investor and entrepreneur, I took it upon myself to challenge the perspectives of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the sufficiency of crypto disclosures. On social media platform X, I directly engaged with comments made by SEC Chair Gary Gensler, expressing concerns over the perceived lack of transparency in cryptocurrency operations.

As a crypto investor, I’d like to clarify my perspective on Gary’s statement that crypto lacks disclosures, which contrasts with Gensler’s view that more transparency is needed in this sector. In response, I’d argue that Ethereum, for instance, operates as a decentralized ledger that issues an “earnings report” every 12 seconds through its blockchain. This information is publicly accessible to anyone with an internet connection, allowing us to gain real-time insights into the network’s status.

As a researcher studying the intersection of finance and technology, I’d like to emphasize the unique transparency features of blockchain technology that set it apart from traditional financial systems. Unlike corporate disclosures that may be closed off to the public, the open-source nature of blockchain allows for unprecedented levels of transparency. All network activities are openly auditable by anyone, providing a stark contrast to the more opaque systems prevalent in traditional markets. In fact, I’d argue that crypto’s disclosure standards surpass those of traditional finance, offering enhanced financial transparency. This transparency challenges the SEC’s perspective and underscores the advanced capabilities of blockchain technology.

Adams proposes that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could improve its own disclosure system by merging its EDGAR database with Ethereum’s blockchain. This fusion might enable the SEC to leverage the transparency of blockchain technology, creating a more vibrant and convenient avenue for financial reporting.

Adams posits that the continuous regulatory debates concerning disclosure rules could be masking underlying concerns over control rather than promoting transparency. In his perspective, these initiatives are less about revealing information and more about retaining authority within financial structures. Adams emphasizes that the core philosophy behind Bitcoin and related technologies is to establish a monetary system where disclosures are built-in and auditability is open to all participants.

As an analyst, I’d like to delve deeper into the topic of Bitcoin’s inherent transparency. Unlike conventional financial systems, such as the US dollar, anyone can operate a Bitcoin node. This personal involvement guarantees uninterrupted access to comprehensive information regarding the total supply of Bitcoins in circulation. Such openness sets Bitcoin apart from traditional financial structures where access to this level of critical data is not readily available.

As a researcher, I find it hard to believe that someone holds such a contradictory view regarding Bitcoin’s transparency. Bitcoin was designed to establish a digital currency system where disclosures are inherently built-in.— RYAN SΞAN ADAMS – rsa.eth 🦄 (@RyanSAdams) May 8, 2024

Read More

2024-05-09 15:14