VTI and VTV: A Study in Contrasts

by

Consider two vessels from Vanguard’s fleet: the Total Stock Market ETF (VTI 0.58%) and the Value ETF (VTV 0.55%). One casts its net wide, swallowing the ocean’s depths from minnows to whales; the other hunts selectively in the deep trenches where large-cap value fish dwell. Their differences, like the gap between a symphony’s crescendo and a chamber quartet’s whisper, reveal much about modern portfolio construction’s quiet tragedies and small triumphs.

Let us examine their vital statistics, though numbers often lie like diplomats at a banquet.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric VTV VTI
Issuer Vanguard Vanguard
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.03%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 31, 2025) 13.32% 15.53%
Dividend yield 2.05% 1.11%
Beta (5Y monthly) 0.76 1.04
AUM $216 billion $2 trillion

Here lies a comedy of fractions: VTI’s expense ratio, a hair finer than VTV’s; VTV’s dividend yield, nearly double, as if compensating for some ancestral stinginess. One might ponder whether such slivers of difference justify choosing between a diversified chorus or a value-laced aria.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric VTV VTI
Max drawdown (5 y) -17.03% -25.37%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,624 $1,734

A five-year waltz reveals VTI’s portfolio growing like ivy left untended, while VTV’s drawdowns resemble a cautious gardener’s pruning shears. The market, ever the indifferent dramatist, writes scripts neither fund can fully anticipate.

What’s inside

VTI holds 3,500 stocks, a democratic sprawl mirroring America’s financial census. Technology dominates like a boisterous guest at a dinner party, elbowing aside financial services and consumer cyclicals. Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft reign as monarchs of this realm, their crowns polished by algorithmic traders and retail investors alike.

VTV, meanwhile, curates a stately drawing room of 315 large-cap value names. Financials, healthcare, and industrials converse in measured tones, their dividends flowing like fortified wine. JPMorgan Chase, Berkshire Hathaway, and Johnson & Johnson-stocks that wear their age like a tailored suit, neither dashing nor desperate.

One excludes growth stocks; the other, small companies. Each omission whispers of philosophy: VTI’s “let them all in” approach versus VTV’s “only the seasoned” guest list.

What this means for investors

Here we confront the eternal question: Does one seek a tapestry woven from every thread, or a single strand dyed deep in value’s ochre? VTI, the democrat, offers diversification so thorough it borders on nihilism-no company too small, no sector too obscure. VTV, the traditionalist, clings to large-cap value’s perceived stability, its dividends a metronome ticking through market storms.

Risk, that most subjective of specters, haunts them differently. VTI’s broad shoulders bear market volatility like a stoic, while VTV’s narrower frame sways less, though whether this is virtue or timidity depends on one’s vantage. A penny saved in fees-though pennies have a way of multiplying-hardly offsets VTV’s siren song of double-digit yields for income-seekers.

Investors choosing between them resemble Chekhov’s characters at crossroads: one path paved with broad-market inevitability, the other winding through value’s familiar groves. Both roads, ultimately, lead to the same horizon where all portfolios merge into the mist of compounding time.

Advertisement

Glossary

ETF: A financial instrument masquerading as simplicity itself.
Total market exposure: The Sisyphean task of owning every stone in the market’s hill.
Large-cap: Ships too big to capsize, though not always swift.
Value stocks: The financial equivalent of second-hand books-prized for their hidden margins.
Beta: A measure of how loudly one’s portfolio echoes the market’s heartbeat.
CRSP US Total Market Index: A ledger chronicling capitalism’s every twitch.

And so we watch the markets, ever hopeful, ever disappointed-a Chekhovian drama without end 📈.

Read More

2025-12-31 23:52