VTI and SPTM: A Matter of Scale

by

The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and the State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) are presented to the investing public as foundational instruments for achieving broad exposure to the U.S. equity market. The claim is not, strictly speaking, false. However, a closer examination reveals a distinction less about fundamental investment strategy, and more about the mechanics of scale – a familiar story in the modern financial landscape.

This analysis will attempt to dissect their respective merits, focusing on costs, holdings, performance, and inherent risks. It is a necessary exercise, not to discover hidden truths, but to illuminate the subtle differences that, while often negligible, may nonetheless prove significant to a discerning investor.

Snapshot: Cost and Magnitude

Metric VTI SPTM
Issuer Vanguard SPDR
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.03%
1-yr return (as of Jan. 26, 2026) 13.55% 13.45%
Dividend yield 1.12% 1.13%
Beta (5Y monthly) 1.04 1.02
AUM $571 billion $12 billion

The costs are, for all intents and purposes, identical. Both ETFs levy a 0.03% annual expense ratio – a figure that, while small, represents a recurring drain on returns. Dividend yields are similarly aligned. An investor seeking purely on the basis of affordability or income will find little to differentiate the two.

Performance and the Illusion of Risk

Metric VTI SPTM
Max drawdown (5 y) -25.36% -24.15%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,698 $1,767

The metrics of “risk,” as commonly presented, are often misleading. Both ETFs experienced substantial drawdowns during the observed period. The notion that a slightly smaller drawdown represents a fundamentally “safer” investment is a comforting fiction. The growth of $1,000 over five years is similarly comparable, with SPTM marginally outperforming VTI. This difference, while real, is unlikely to materially affect long-term investment outcomes.

The Composition of the Whole

SPTM aims to replicate the S&P Composite 1500 Index, encompassing 1,511 U.S. stocks across various market capitalizations. Its sector allocation is predictable: technology dominates (34%), followed by financial services (13%) and consumer cyclicals (11%). The top three holdings – Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft – collectively account for nearly 20% of assets. This concentration, while not necessarily detrimental, underscores the fund’s reliance on a handful of dominant corporations.

VTI, in contrast, tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index, holding over 3,500 stocks. This broader coverage extends to large-, mid-, and small-cap companies. Its sector allocation mirrors that of SPTM, with technology again taking the lead. The top holdings are, unsurprisingly, the same. This similarity highlights a crucial point: the U.S. equity market is increasingly concentrated, and even “broad” market ETFs are heavily influenced by a small number of companies.

Implications for the Investor

VTI and SPTM both provide access to the U.S. stock market at a low cost. They are, for all practical purposes, interchangeable. The differences – a slightly larger number of holdings for VTI, a significantly larger asset base – are matters of degree, not of fundamental substance.

The choice between the two ultimately comes down to a question of preference. An investor who values maximum diversification may favor VTI, despite the marginal benefit. However, the larger asset base of VTI also provides greater liquidity, which may be relevant for institutional investors or those trading large volumes. For the average buy-and-hold investor, this difference is likely negligible.

The proliferation of these nearly identical investment products serves as a reminder that the financial industry often prioritizes volume and fees over genuine innovation. The investor, as always, must exercise caution and discernment, recognizing that even the most sophisticated instruments are subject to the immutable laws of economics.

Read More

2026-01-31 19:33