Understanding Leveraged ETFs: A Deep Dive into SPXL and SSO

by

The realm of leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) presents a curious spectacle, akin to the tense dance of figures on a stage, each vying for the audience’s attention. Among these, the ProShares Ultra S&P 500 ETF (SSO, +1.77%) and the Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares ETF (SPXL, +2.61%) stand out as embodiments of ambition and risk, appealing to traders and investors who seek not merely to participate in the market but to seize its very essence.

SPXL, with its audacious aim of tripling the daily movements of the S&P 500, beckons those eager for greater heights-but such aspirations come at a cost, for the chasm of volatility gapes wide beneath. In contrast, SSO, seeking to double these returns, offers a somewhat gentler approach, yet still invites its own share of perils. Thus unfolds the intricate ballet of their costs, performances, portfolio compositions, and the unique risks each harbors, all of which warrant careful consideration for the discerning investor.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric SSO SPXL
Issuer ProShares Direxion
Expense ratio 0.87% 0.87%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 16, 2025) 16.54% 17.10%
Dividend yield 0.69% 0.75%
Beta (5Y monthly) 2.02 3.07
AUM $7.3 billion $6.2 billion

Though both SSO and SPXL impose identical fees upon their patrons, the latter graces its holders with a marginally superior dividend yield. Yet, given that the true theater of these ETFs unfolds primarily in the short term, one might ponder whether the nuances of fees and yields truly matter in the grander scheme of investment strategy.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric SSO SPXL
Max drawdown (5 y) -46.73% -63.80%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,588 $3,144

Herein lies the crux of the matter: SPXL’s aggressive triple leverage has birthed not only higher five-year gains but also more pronounced declines, thereby illustrating the delicate balance between risk and reward. The considerable max drawdown associated with SPXL serves as a stark reminder of the tumultuous journey one must undertake amidst market corrections, echoing the sentiments of those who navigate the labyrinthine world of investments.

What’s inside

SPXL navigates the vast sea of the S&P 500, holding over 500 stocks, with a substantial leaning towards technology (35% of total assets), along with financial services (14%) and consumer cyclical (11%). Its most significant holdings include the likes of Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, each representing less than 10% of the fund’s entirety.

SSO, while similarly striving for leveraged exposure, operates under a modest 2x daily leverage with an almost identical sector profile and top holdings. Both entities employ a daily leverage reset, a mechanism that may lead to unexpected divergences in performance if held over the long stretch or during tempestuous market conditions.

For those seeking enlightenment on the labyrinth of ETF investing, a comprehensive guide awaits your perusal through this link.

What this means for investors

Leveraged ETFs, while undoubtedly high-risk, also offer the tantalizing prospect of substantial earnings. The paths of SSO and SPXL diverge primarily in their leverage factor: SSO aims for 2x the daily returns of the S&P 500, whilst SPXL boldly targets a staggering 3x. In this duel of ambitions, SPXL emerges as the more lucrative option, albeit with an accompanying surge in risk and volatility.

In the panorama of the past year, SPXL’s total returns have merely edged ahead of SSO’s; however, observing the unfolding narrative over five years reveals a striking tale of SPXL more than tripling its worth, far outpacing its counterpart.

Investors thus find themselves at a crossroads, grappling with the question of whether the allure of potential returns justifies the accompanying turbulence. With SPXL’s max drawdown significantly exceeding that of SSO, it becomes evident that the price swings are not for the faint of heart. Its elevated beta further underscores the volatility that accompanies its pursuit of grandeur.

Yet, perhaps volatility is not inherently negative-if one possesses the fortitude to withstand its capricious nature. Should you be inclined to embrace the tempest of significant price fluctuations, SPXL may well prove to be the more rewarding of these two leveraged ETFs.

Glossary

Leverage: The utilization of borrowed funds or derivatives to amplify investment returns, inevitably magnifying both potential gains and losses.
Expense ratio: An annual fee expressed as a percentage, imposed by a fund upon its shareholders.
Beta: A metric denoting an investment’s volatility in relation to the broader market; a higher beta signifies greater price oscillations.
Drawdown: The percentage decline from a fund’s peak value to its nadir over a specified timeframe.
Dividend yield: The annual dividends disbursed by a fund or stock, represented as a percentage of its current price.
Daily leverage reset: The process whereby leveraged funds recalibrate their exposure each day to maintain a predetermined leverage ratio.
Path-dependent results: Outcomes intricately tied to the sequence of returns rather than the mere aggregate return, often influencing leveraged funds.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of assets a fund oversees on behalf of its investors.
Sector profile: The categorization of a fund’s investments by industry sectors, revealing concentrations of assets.
Max drawdown: The largest recorded loss from a fund’s apex to its trough within a designated period.
Total return: The investment’s price change plus all dividends and distributions, presuming reinvestment of those payouts.

🌿

Read More

2025-12-21 07:17