U.S. Banks Instructed to Halt Crypto Services, Coinbase Uncovers Evidence

As a seasoned researcher with years of experience navigating the complexities of financial regulations and their impact on emerging industries, I find these revelations about the FDIC’s stance on cryptocurrency deeply concerning. The letters shared by Coinbase seem to paint a picture of a calculated effort to exclude crypto from the banking ecosystem, reminiscent of modern-day Operation Chokepoint 2.0.


Coinbase has disclosed heavily censored correspondence with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), suggesting that the regulator urged banks to slow down or avoid dealing with cryptocurrencies throughout 2022. These documents, obtained after a legal dispute initiated by research firm History Associates Inc., reveal the FDIC’s covert attempts to dissuade banks from participating in the cryptocurrency market.

What the Letters Reveal

The FDIC’s position was unequivocal: they were not receptive to cryptocurrency-related banking actions. One of the 23 letters sent by Coinbase contained directives stating, “We kindly request that you temporarily halt all activities related to crypto assets. The FDIC will inform all banks under its supervision at a later time once a decision has been made regarding the expectations for participating in crypto asset-related activities.

Many banks have been hindered from launching cryptocurrency products and services due to the intricate compliance requirements typically found in these letters. On occasion, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) even requested banks to temporarily halt certain operations while they examined their compliance procedures. However, the FDIC’s uncertainty about the specific regulations or filings needed for approval has led to a dampening effect on crypto innovation within the banking industry.

Industry Backlash

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, has referred to the letters as clear proof of a strategically planned attempt to keep cryptocurrency out of the traditional banking system. In other words, according to Grewal, the FDIC intentionally carried out a well-thought-out plan to deny banking services to a legitimate American industry, which should concern everyone.

The crypto industry has long argued that it faces unfair treatment from regulators, likening this campaign to a modern-day Operation Chokepoint 2.0, a controversial government initiative from the early 2010s that targeted legal but politically sensitive industries by cutting off their access to banking.

Although the disclosures made, the complete picture of the FDIC’s actions is yet to be clarified. A significant portion of the information in the disclosed letters has been blacked out, concealing the identities of the institutions and the precise services they intended to provide. Coinbase intends to take further legal measures to reveal these hidden details, with the goal of understanding the reasons behind the FDIC’s firm position.

Regulatory Uncertainty

The FDIC’s stance underscores the broader uncertainty regarding cryptocurrencies in the U.S. Although organizations such as the FDIC, Federal Reserve, and OCC have issued warnings about digital currencies, a unified regulatory structure for the industry is yet to be established. This situation places banks in a challenging position between technological advancement and compliance risks, potentially hindering the expansion of cryptocurrency adoption within traditional banking systems.

Debanking in Action

The topic of “debanking” was likewise brought up during a recent congressional hearing. Nathan McCauley, CEO of Anchorage Digital (a federally chartered cryptocurrency bank), stated that they too have been excluded from financial services. Essentially, he said, “We’ve experienced the same predicament as being ‘debanked.’ It’s surprising, given that we are a national bank ourselves.

The Road Ahead

Coinbase’s battle against excessive regulatory measures is not yet concluded. Grewal highlighted the need for transparency, asserting, “Federal courts have frequently mandated the FDIC to reveal this information, but they persist in their resistance. It’s high time for complete accountability.

In my journey as a crypto investor, the recent disclosures serve as a stark reminder of the challenges our industry encounters while striving for fair recognition within conventional financial frameworks. Whether these exposés will trigger significant adjustments in how regulators handle cryptocurrencies is yet to be determined. However, one thing is certain: the discussion surrounding the crypto sector’s role in American finance is far from being resolved.

Read More

2024-12-07 11:52