Trump’s Economic Plans Could Add $15 Trillion to U.S. Debt, Studies Warn

by

As a researcher with a background in economics, these studies have piqued my interest and raised some concerns about the potential impact of Donald Trump’s economic proposals if implemented. With years of experience analyzing economic data and policies, I find it troubling to see that his plans could add up to $15 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. This is a significant amount that could have far-reaching implications for future generations.

Two contemporary analyses indicate that if implemented, Donald Trump’s past economic plans could significantly increase the national debt of the United States and potentially result in increased expenses for many American citizens. This is based on an article written by Andrew Duehren and Alan Rappeport for The New York Times (NYT).

According to a report by The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), Donald Trump’s proposed plans might potentially increase the country’s debt by as much as $15 trillion over the next ten years. This is nearly twice the projected impact on the national debt of Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic strategy, as stated in a New York Times article. Furthermore, research from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) suggests that Trump’s tax and tariff policies would predominantly favor the wealthiest citizens, with others bearing a larger financial burden.

According to the New York Times, while the CRFB’s report examines the long-term costs associated with both candidates’ tax and spending policies, ITEP’s analysis zeroes in on the short-term effects, particularly those of Trump’s tax and tariff initiatives in 2026. In essence, these studies suggest that Trump’s agenda could disproportionately affect lower-income households financially. The NYT explains that Trump’s broad tariffs on most U.S. imports and his extension of tax breaks for the wealthiest individuals are at the heart of this plan.

Trump’s tax suggestions involve not taxing overtime pay, tips, and Social Security benefits, which The New York Times notes could encourage wealthier individuals to take advantage of these tax exemptions. Although these tax reductions would offer advantages for all income levels, the ITEP study indicates that the resulting tariffs would escalate the price of goods and services, adversely affecting lower-income citizens more significantly since they typically spend a higher proportion of their income on necessities such as food and clothing.

According to an analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), Trump’s proposed policies could potentially increase the U.S. debt by as much as $15 trillion over the next ten years, with a midrange estimate of $7.5 trillion. In contrast, Harris’s plans are projected to raise the debt by $8 trillion at most. Notably, even in a more conservative assessment, Harris’s plan is considered “deficit neutral,” meaning it would not contribute to the growing national debt.

According to the New York Times, a significant issue highlighted is Trump’s proposed tariffs, which may lead to increased expenses for American consumers. The ITEP study reveals that these tariffs could equate to a 20% general tax on all imports, with a hefty 60% tariff particularly on Chinese goods. The New York Times also states that these tariffs would impose an extra 4.8% of income on the lowest 20% of American wage earners, whereas the wealthiest 1% might enjoy annual tax savings averaging $36,320.

According to Trump, his tariffs would primarily impact foreign businesses; however, The New York Times points out that several economic analyses indicate these expenses ultimately get transferred to U.S. consumers. Trump’s advisors have backed his economic plans, asserting that tariffs would aid in reducing the deficit by producing additional income.

According to a report by the New York Times, neither Trump nor Harris have focused significantly on reducing the deficit during their campaigns. Instead, they’ve emphasized tax reductions and new financial plans. Notably, the U.S. national debt, currently hovering around $36 trillion, has surpassed the costs of military expenditures and social welfare programs due to increasing interest payments, as per the report.

Read More

2024-10-07 16:22