The Investors’ Trial: Two AI Stocks in a Labyrinth of Silicon and Code

by

In the shadowed corridors of contemporary enterprise, where the machinery of artificial intelligence hums ceaselessly, one might mistake the present moment for a fever dream conjured by obsolete algorithms. The world, vast and unknowable, has subdivided itself into infinite silos of progress: generative phantoms, speech-recognizing specters, robotic appendages twitching in sterile laboratories, and predictive models that whisper prophecies to bankers and generals alike. The military, through a system known as Palantir Technologies’ AIP-a name evoking both omniscience and inscrutable bureaucracy-has embraced this machinery, though its true function remains obscured by layers of protocol.

1. Aehr Test Systems: The Tester and the Test

Aehr Test Systems, a company whose name suggests both urgency and exhaustion, occupies itself with the Sisyphean task of testing silicon carbide semiconductors-chips essential to electric vehicles, yet now repurposed for the insatiable appetites of data centers. The company’s stock, once a proud $50 per share in 2023, collapsed to $7 by 2025, as if punished for some unfathomable transgression against the market’s celestial order. Yet redemption, or at least reinvention, arrives in the form of vertical chip integration, where stacked semiconductors threaten systemic failure should even a single unit falter-a microcosm of corporate fragility.

Loading widget...

The global chip market, a leviathan growing to $92 billion this year, demands perfection from its servants. Hyperscalers, those faceless titans of digital infrastructure, now seek Aehr’s expertise to vet their custom AI chips. The company’s backlog, swollen to $15 million by May 2025, becomes a ledger of deferred hope. Revenue may have dipped to $59 million in fiscal 2025, but optimism persists, irrational and unkillable, as if the stock itself were a character in a parable about futility.

2. Figma: The Designer’s Dilemma

In the realm of graphic design, AI has become both collaborator and usurper. Tasks once performed by trembling human hands-cropping, erasing, aligning-are now automated, leaving designers to wander the purgatory of “idea creation.” Generative AI, capable of conjuring images from textual commands, offers novelty but lacks the ineffable spark of human despair. Figma, a cloud-based design platform, entered public markets with the spectacle of a July 31 IPO, its shares soaring to $122 before settling at $70-a valuation of $34 billion that defies arithmetic.

Adobe, Figma’s would-be suitor in a $20 billion merger denied by regulators, now wages silent war. Figma’s revenue, rising from $500 million in 2023 to $820 million over the past year, mocks the laws of economic gravity. Yet its price-to-sales ratio, a grotesque 42 times trailing revenue, suggests a disconnect between the material world and the realm of speculative fantasy.

To invest in Figma is to participate in a ritual whose meaning eludes even the participants. The company reports 13 million monthly active users and 95% penetration of Fortune 500 firms, metrics that glow like neon signs in a fog. Yet Adobe, with $23 billion in revenue and a price-to-sales ratio of 7, looms as a monument to old-world stability. The prudent investor, sensing the absurdity of the choice before them, hesitates-a figure frozen at a crossroads, unsure if they are the architect or the rubble of their own decisions.

The labyrinth offers no exit, only corridors that twist inward. One purchases shares, or does not, and the market continues its indifferent calculations. 🤖

Read More

2025-09-05 11:41