The Art of Prevention: Quantifying Defensive Value in Soccer

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new machine learning framework moves beyond tackles and interceptions to comprehensively assess the true impact of defensive players.

Researchers introduce DEFCON, a Graph Neural Network approach that values defensive contributions by modeling prevented attacks and expected possession value.

Quantifying defensive performance in soccer remains a challenge, as impactful defending often occurs before visible actions like tackles. This is addressed in ‘Better Prevent than Tackle: Valuing Defense in Soccer Based on Graph Neural Networks’, which introduces DEFCON, a framework leveraging Graph Attention Networks to evaluate player contributions by assessing prevented attacks and quantifying expected possession value. DEFCON assigns credit to defenders based on their impact on reducing opponents’ scoring opportunities, demonstrating strong correlation with established player market valuations. Could this approach fundamentally reshape how defensive talent is scouted and strategically deployed in the modern game?

Unveiling the Hidden Game: Beyond Offensive Metrics

Current soccer analytics largely prioritize measuring offensive potential, with metrics like Expected Threat (xT) charting the likelihood of a sequence culminating in a shot. However, this emphasis creates an incomplete picture of match dynamics by often neglecting the substantial influence of defensive interventions. While xT effectively captures attacking promise, it struggles to account for actions that prevent those attacks from developing – a crucial element of successful soccer. A well-timed tackle, an intelligent interception, or even a strategically disruptive foul, all significantly alter the probability of scoring opportunities, yet these contributions are frequently undervalued or entirely absent from conventional analyses. Consequently, relying solely on offensive metrics can lead to misinterpretations of player performance and tactical effectiveness, underscoring the need for a more balanced and comprehensive evaluation framework that acknowledges the pivotal role of defensive play.

Current soccer analytics, heavily weighted towards offensive metrics, frequently struggle to fully explain match results. While quantifying the probability of scoring from a pass or shot provides valuable insight, these models often fall short because they inadequately account for the preventative actions of defenders. A team can consistently generate attacking opportunities, yet concede goals due to defensive lapses that remain largely unmeasured by existing frameworks. This disconnect between offensive output and actual game outcomes underscores a critical need for comprehensive defensive evaluation; a robust system that accurately assigns value to tackles, interceptions, positioning, and the disruption of opponent attacks is essential for a more complete and predictive understanding of the beautiful game.

Determining a defender’s true value presents a unique analytical hurdle, stemming from the sheer variety of actions that constitute effective defense. Unlike scoring, which offers a clear, quantifiable result, defensive contributions are often fragmented and contextual; a successful tackle relies on positioning, anticipation, and even the attacker’s initial movement. Assigning credit proves particularly difficult when considering ‘preventative’ actions – intelligent positioning that prevents an attack from developing rarely registers as a visible event, yet demonstrably impacts the game. Furthermore, defensive success frequently involves collaborative efforts, making it challenging to isolate individual contributions from team-level performance. This complexity demands innovative metrics that move beyond simple counts of tackles or interceptions, and instead focus on the quality of defensive actions and their impact on limiting opponent opportunities.

A truly holistic understanding of soccer necessitates moving beyond solely evaluating offensive prowess and developing a robust framework for quantifying defensive contributions. Current analytical methods disproportionately emphasize actions leading to goal-scoring opportunities, leaving a significant gap in assessing the preventative measures that often define match outcomes. Effective defense isn’t simply about stopping shots; it encompasses disrupting passing lanes, winning tackles in crucial areas, intelligent positioning to intercept play, and pressuring opponents into errors-all subtle yet impactful actions difficult to capture with existing metrics. A comprehensive defensive evaluation system would need to account for these nuances, potentially utilizing spatial data, pressure maps, and opponent disengagement rates to paint a more accurate picture of a player’s or team’s defensive worth, ultimately offering a more complete and insightful analysis of the intricate dynamics at play within the game.

DEFCON: Reverse-Engineering Defensive Value

DEFCON employs Graph Attention Networks (GAT) to represent player interactions as a graph, where nodes represent players and edges define their relationships during gameplay. This allows the system to model the complex dependencies between players when evaluating actions. The GAT architecture learns attention weights on these edges, quantifying the influence each player has on another’s actions. Specifically, the model estimates the probability of a successful action by considering not only the attacker’s attributes, but also the defensive pressure exerted by nearby defenders, as determined by the learned attention weights. This probabilistic framework enables a nuanced understanding of action outcomes, factoring in the degree to which defenders successfully disrupt or prevent an attacker’s attempt, going beyond simple binary success/failure metrics.

Defender Responsibility within the DEFCON framework is calculated as the change in the probability of an attacker successfully completing an action, directly attributable to the presence and positioning of a defending player. This metric is not simply a binary determination of prevention; rather, it’s a continuous value between 0 and 1, representing the degree to which the defender reduced the attacker’s success probability. The calculation leverages the output of Graph Attention Networks (GATs) which model player interactions and uses the difference in predicted success probability with and without the defender’s influence as the core measurement. A Defender Responsibility of 0 indicates no discernible impact on the action’s probability, while a value of 1 signifies complete prevention. This value is then weighted by the Expected Possession Value (EPV) of the action to determine the overall credit assigned to the defender.

DEFCON incorporates Expected Possession Value (EPV) as a weighting factor in defensive credit assignment. EPV, calculated as the expected number of future possessions gained by preventing an action, provides a quantitative measure of the neutralized threat. This value is then used to scale the credit awarded to defenders; actions prevented that result in a high EPV – indicating a significant shift in possession probability – contribute more substantially to a defender’s overall credit score than those with lower EPV. By weighting prevented actions with their corresponding EPV, DEFCON ensures that defensive contributions are assessed not merely by the quantity of interventions, but by the qualitative impact on game state and possession dynamics. The formula for calculating a defender’s contribution incorporates $EPV_{prevented} * influence_{defender}$ to determine the magnitude of credit assigned.

Pairwise analysis within the DEFCON framework dissects individual contributions to specific actions by evaluating each defender-attacker pairing. This granular approach moves beyond aggregate metrics by assessing the impact of each defender on each attacker’s potential success. The system calculates a contribution score for both the defender and the attacker in each pairing, considering factors such as proximity, interception attempts, and the ultimate outcome of the action. This detailed analysis allows for a nuanced understanding of defensive effectiveness, identifying which defenders most significantly disrupted attacking plays and quantifying the attackers’ failed attempts based on specific defensive interventions. The resulting data informs a more precise assignment of credit for successful defensive plays and highlights areas for improvement in both defensive and offensive strategies.

Validating the System: DEFCON in the Crucible

The Graph Attention Network (GAT) models that form the basis of DEFCON were trained and validated using a comprehensive dataset from the Dutch Eredivisie. This dataset included detailed event data covering multiple seasons, allowing for rigorous assessment of model performance. Training involved optimizing model parameters to accurately represent player interactions and defensive contributions. Validation was performed using held-out data to ensure the models generalize effectively to unseen matches and avoid overfitting. The resulting models demonstrate robust performance in identifying and quantifying key defensive actions, providing a reliable foundation for the metrics generated by DEFCON.

Correlation analysis was performed to assess the distinctiveness of DEFCON-derived defensive metrics. Results indicate a weak correlation with established offensive metrics, specifically xT (Expected Threat), VAEP (Valuing Actions by Estimating Probabilities), and GIM (Goal Impact Metric). This suggests that DEFCON metrics are not simply reflecting offensive play, but rather quantifying defensive contributions independently, and providing a novel perspective on match analysis beyond existing offensive-focused models. The observed lack of strong correlation supports the hypothesis that DEFCON captures unique information regarding defensive performance.

DEFCON incorporates visualizations including Heatmaps and Interactive Timelines to facilitate granular analysis of defensive performance. Heatmaps display the spatial distribution of defensive actions – such as tackles, interceptions, and clearances – across the pitch, allowing users to identify areas of concentrated defensive effort and potential vulnerabilities. Interactive Timelines present a chronological sequence of key defensive events, linked to specific match moments, enabling detailed investigation of defensive contributions during critical phases of play. These visualizations are designed to move beyond aggregate statistics and provide contextual understanding of how and where defensive actions impact match outcomes, supporting both tactical analysis and player evaluation.

Analysis of the Eredivisie dataset revealed a strong positive correlation (0.754) between penalties incurred for conceding dangerous attacks and player market value. This correlation surpasses those observed when using traditional on-ball defensive metrics to assess player impact. The findings indicate that DEFCON’s methodology, focused on quantifying the consequences of dangerous attacking situations, effectively captures impactful defensive contributions that are not readily apparent through conventional metrics such as tackles, interceptions, or blocks. This suggests DEFCON provides a more nuanced and accurate valuation of defensive player performance based on preventing high-value scoring opportunities.

Beyond the Scoreline: Implications for the Future of Football

Current player valuations often prioritize goals and assists, potentially overlooking crucial defensive contributions. Recent analysis introduces DEFCON – a metric designed to quantify a player’s overall defensive impact, moving beyond traditional statistics. This approach revealed a significant correlation – 0.563 – between a player’s net defensive credit, as calculated by DEFCON, and their market value, specifically among center backs. This suggests that a more holistic assessment of player worth, incorporating detailed defensive metrics, could more accurately reflect true market value and influence transfer decisions. The findings support the notion that clubs could benefit from recognizing and financially rewarding players who consistently excel in preventing goals, rather than solely focusing on those who score them.

The traditional assessment of football players often prioritizes goals and assists, potentially overlooking the significant, yet subtle, contributions of defensive specialists. DEFCON metrics aim to rectify this imbalance by quantifying defensive actions – tackles, interceptions, clearances, and positioning – providing a more comprehensive evaluation of a player’s overall worth. This detailed analysis empowers scouting networks and recruitment teams to identify undervalued talent, recognizing defensive players whose impact extends beyond conventional statistics. Consequently, clubs can refine their talent acquisition strategies, securing players who demonstrably improve defensive stability and potentially offer a higher return on investment than those solely judged on attacking output. By revealing the true value of these often-underappreciated players, DEFCON facilitates a more informed and nuanced approach to building a well-rounded and defensively resilient squad.

The granular data provided by DEFCON extends beyond simple performance statistics, offering coaches a nuanced understanding of defensive contributions that can directly inform tactical adjustments. By pinpointing specific actions – successful tackles, interceptions preventing key passes, and even positioning that disrupts opponent attacks – the system reveals previously hidden strengths and weaknesses within a defensive unit. This allows for more targeted training drills, optimized player roles within a formation, and data-driven decisions regarding match-day lineups. Furthermore, DEFCON’s ability to quantify the impact of individual defensive maneuvers can facilitate experimentation with different formations, enabling coaches to identify setups that maximize defensive solidity while maintaining attacking threat. Ultimately, the system moves beyond broad tactical concepts and provides actionable insights for refining defensive strategies at a micro level, potentially unlocking significant improvements in team performance.

The development of DEFCON is not intended as a static assessment; ongoing research aims to broaden its scope significantly. Future iterations will extend the metric’s application beyond the initially studied league, encompassing a diverse range of international competitions to validate its universality and refine its parameters across different playing styles. Furthermore, investigations are underway to integrate DEFCON into live game analysis platforms, enabling real-time evaluation of defensive contributions during matches. This will allow for dynamic tactical adjustments and potentially provide a competitive edge for coaching staff. Beyond immediate performance assessment, the team is exploring the use of DEFCON data in predictive modeling, with the goal of forecasting future defensive performance and identifying undervalued players with high potential – ultimately aiming to revolutionize player valuation and scouting practices.

The pursuit of comprehensive defensive valuation, as presented in this work, mirrors a fundamental tenet of systems understanding: to truly grasp a system, one must probe its boundaries. This research, utilizing Graph Neural Networks to assess prevented attacks alongside successful defenses, exemplifies this principle. Brian Kernighan aptly stated, “Debugging is like being the detective in a crime movie where you are also the murderer.” DEFCON, in essence, isn’t merely cataloging defensive successes; it’s reconstructing the potential attacks, identifying vulnerabilities before they materialize, and assigning value to the interventions that prevented them – a form of intellectual ‘debugging’ applied to the beautiful game. The framework’s focus on Expected Possession Value highlights a shift from reactive analysis to proactive prevention, acknowledging that a strong defense isn’t just about stopping shots, but about disrupting the opponent’s ability to create them.

Beyond the Block

The pursuit of defensive valuation, as outlined by this work, inevitably bumps against the inherent messiness of the game. DEFCON offers a compelling architecture for assigning credit, but it also highlights how readily a system built on ‘prevented’ actions approaches a simulation of potentiality. The model, by its nature, attempts to quantify what didn’t happen – a fundamentally uncertain endeavor. Future iterations will likely grapple not with refining the graph neural network itself, but with the philosophical implications of evaluating absence.

A critical path forward lies in acknowledging the limitations of action recognition as the sole input. The framework currently operates on discrete events, yet defensive mastery often resides in the subtle manipulation of space, tempo, and opponent decision-making-factors difficult to distill into identifiable actions. Incorporating contextual data, perhaps through multi-modal learning or even the integration of player tracking data beyond simple action labels, could reveal a more nuanced picture of defensive contribution.

Ultimately, the true test of any such system won’t be its predictive accuracy, but its ability to illuminate the hidden geometries of the game. One suspects that truly understanding defense isn’t about perfecting a valuation model, but about recognizing that chaos is not an enemy, but a mirror of architecture reflecting unseen connections. The goal, then, should not be to eliminate uncertainty, but to map its contours.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.10355.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-14 15:59