Talking Movies: Decoding the Movie Ratings at IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes

by

https://iframe.iono.fm/e/1478398

As a seasoned cinephile who has spent countless hours immersed in the rich tapestry of celluloid dreams, I find myself both enamored and dismayed by the modern movie rating systems on platforms like IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes.

Welcome to Talking Movies, I’m Spling.

This week’s discussion is centered around understanding Movie Ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes. In the past, our sources of movie-related curiosity and data were limited to newspapers, magazines, TV, radio, and personal recommendations.

In this digital era, having immediate access to information gives us power, and it’s something that consumers are leveraging when making their choices. Why wouldn’t you quickly look up details online, consult AI, or check out a website before making a decision? This applies not only to film reviews and movie critics like me but also to anyone selecting a movie for movie night. Previously, people might have relied on just a few voices when it came to choosing the right film. However, nowadays, there’s an abundance of opinions available at our fingertips.

Readers can gradually discern or come to trust specific voices in reviews, as understanding the critic’s preferences, favored genres, general attitude, and their particular rating patterns can make them more relatable, even if not everyone shares their opinions. Today, you can access film critiques ranging from esteemed sources like RogerEbert.com to casual opinions shared by your movie-loving friend on social media.

Movie reviewers are expressing their opinions in a variety of places these days, ranging from YouTube channels, blogs, traditional print media, and established online publications. Nowadays, moviegoers feel empowered with the help of IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes, which can steer them towards superior films by using rating systems like IMDb’s out-of-10 score, which is determined by collective ratings and offers links to professional critiques.

Providing a sense of the numerous perspectives compacted into a single figure, this seems reliable. Widely trusted by experts in the field and film enthusiasts alike, it’s frequently used as a reference and tends to appear high in Google searches. Nevertheless, it doesn’t serve as the ultimate authority. Its results can be influenced by the demographics, tastes, and preferences of its dedicated user base.

In an ideal scenario, the rating system should accurately reflect individual viewers’ opinions. However, it can be manipulated. For instance, some groups may exploit the platform to distort public perception about certain movies. Additionally, there are enthusiasts who strive to shield their favorite films from being diminished by lower ratings. A quick glance at the ratings on IMDb will reveal this voting distribution.

Most films tend to receive an uneven distribution of ratings, with many receiving either perfect 10/10 scores or dismal 1/10 ratings. It’s hard to determine if a user has actually watched a movie before rating it, as the system relies on honesty and there’s no way to confirm that the raters have actually seen the film they are evaluating. The system can be manipulated by public opinion, with some people artificially inflating a film’s rating to boost ticket sales or intentionally lowering it to sabotage its success. This flawed approach often results in an inaccurate representation of a film’s overall quality.

Rotten Tomatoes has a selective process for welcoming film critics, which lends an air of strength to their system. Although it’s helpful to grasp the overall opinion of critics through consensus and brief reviews, there are certain drawbacks. For instance, many viewers find it challenging to decipher the tomato meter percentage score that is frequently used as a single factor when choosing a movie.

This refers to the proportion of critics who gave positive reviews for a particular film. Unlike an average rating out of ten, a “fresh” score doesn’t indicate the film’s quality on a sliding scale. For instance, a movie rated 6 out of 10 could still have a 100% fresh score, meaning every critic who reviewed it found it to be new or innovative, but generally just above average in quality.

Another issue is determining a mean score from the film critics, since each of them is working on a different rating system or none at all. How do you credit a positive review with a rating, or how do you determine a score based on an out-of-4 rating system versus an out-of-10 one? These discrepancies can alter ratings quite substantially when pulling from a selection of less than 100 reviews. While Rotten Tomatoes have moved away from aggregating critic scores, there does seem to be a need to anchor the tomato meter to another element for context.

On the site, users can now share their thoughts on films by writing reviews and rating them. This gives average moviegoers an opportunity to show off their inner film critic. The collected opinions help Rotten Tomatoes determine a more reliable consensus, as user ratings are displayed alongside professional critic scores. This approach adds credibility, especially when linked to individual accounts. Moreover, reading user reviews helps separate those who have seen the movie from those who haven’t, making it simpler to distinguish between informed and uninformed opinions.

It might be more effective if they required critics to follow a similar approval process. Currently, the system isn’t flawless because the ratings are based on individual, unverified reviewers. Rotten Tomatoes does identify top reviewers and has certified movie critics, but it appears that this is just repeating the cycle.

As social media and online publications have shown their flaws, sometimes driven by hidden agendas, there’s a growing demand for experts whose knowledge and credibility are respected. Though apps that connect back to Facebook profiles help build trust, they still lack the depth required in entertainment journalism and news reporting. What truly matters is maintaining traditional values like honesty and transparency, earning trust without any room for doubt or suspicion.

As a passionate cinephile, if you’re craving for in-depth movie reviews, captivating interviews, and fascinating insights from past Talking Movies podcast episodes, be sure to drop by splingmovies.com! And remember, always do your homework before hitting the red carpet – SPL!NG it, not winging it!

Read More

2024-09-07 23:43