tag, under 100 characters, not repeated as a header. The original had “Here’s How Much Uniswap (UNI) Will Be Burnt With New Proposal” as the title, which is now replaced with the clickbait one. Putting it all together: each paragraph needs to be transformed into a lyrical, metaphorical version, keeping the technical details but cloaked in Pasternak’s style. Balance the humor and emojis without overdoing it. Check that all HTML structure is intact, no markdown, no color styles.End of Thought (17.37s) Uniswap’s UNI Token Faces Inferno: $38M Monthly Burns Predicted 🎯🔥

by

Amidst the frostbitten tundras of decentralized finance, Uniswap Labs-architect of the blockchain’s most labyrinthine bazaar-has unveiled a fee structure so radical, it might as well be a symphony of token annihilation. The community, armed with calculators sharpened like scythes, now prophesies the cremation of $38 million worth of UNI each month. A pyre fueled by 0.05% of liquidity provider fees, this could make Uniswap the Grim Reaper of crypto’s bloated supply 🕯️💸.

$1.27 million per day: A ballet of token destruction pirouettes into the void

Picture this: every day, $1.27 million in UNI tokens vanish like autumn leaves in a gale, their digital ashes scattered across Ethereum’s ether. The math, scribbled by the sages of MegaETH (a realm where transactions gallop at 100,000 TPS), suggests Uniswap will outpace Pump.fun’s $35M bonfire but trail Hyperliquid’s inferno of $95M. A goldilocks paradox: not too hot, not too cold, but just enough to make hodlers weep 🧂📊.

Let us consult the ledger’s cruel arithmetic:

→ 0.3% LP fee, once a sacred cow, now cleaved into 0.25% (LP) and 0.05% (UNI’s funeral pyre).
→ $2.8B in annual fees-multiply by 0.05%, and the result is a monthly $38M elegy.

Thus, Uniswap ascends to the pantheon of buybacks, sandwiched between Pump.fun’s campfire and Hyperliquid’s supernova. 🌌

– BREAD | ∑: (@bread_) November 10, 2025

But wait! There’s more. Uniswap Labs, ever the alchemists, shall toss Unichain sequencer fees and 100 million UNI from the treasury into the blaze. A bonfire of vanities, if you will. And as users swap tokens like frenzied gamblers, the protocol’s supply dwindles-a tragic opera where scarcity wears the crown 👑📉.

“This proposal,” they intone, “is a love letter to stability, a pact between protocol and ether. Usage begets burn, and burns beget progress.” A romantic tragedy, really. 💌

Uniswap (UNI) crashes the buyback soiree

Enter the Protocol Fee Discount Auctions-a masquerade ball where liquidity providers waltz with MEV (yes, that villain). Uniswap v4, now an aggregator of aggregators, feasts on external liquidity like a vampire at a blood bank. The result? UNI becomes scarcer than a polar bear at the Sahara’s annual picnic. And the price? It did a backflip, soaring 25% to $10. Hodlers wept; bears cried foul. 🐻💸

In closing, the sages of MegaETH mused: “Uniswap Labs now buys back more than Pump.fun but less than Hyperliquid. A middle child of fiscal irresponsibility.” Meanwhile, the crypto buyback circus balloons to $1.4 billion. Cue the clown car 🤡🎪.

tags and no color styles.

Check for humor and sarcasm. For example, when talking about the price jump, “the UNI price pirouetted upwards by 25%” adds a bit of flair. Emojis like 🚀 or 💥 can add a modern touch.

Finally, ensure that the title is in

tag, under 100 characters, not repeated as a header. The original had “Here’s How Much Uniswap (UNI) Will Be Burnt With New Proposal” as the title, which is now replaced with the clickbait one.</p> <p>Putting it all together: each paragraph needs to be transformed into a lyrical, metaphorical version, keeping the technical details but cloaked in Pasternak’s style. Balance the humor and emojis without overdoing it. Check that all HTML structure is intact, no markdown, no color styles.End of Thought (17.37s)<br /> <title>Uniswap’s UNI Token Faces Inferno: $38M Monthly Burns Predicted 🎯🔥

Read More

2025-11-11 18:27