Five thousand names flicker across U.S. stock exchanges-corporate egos, financial instruments, and paper streams of cash. Most fade from the indexes that masquerade as economy-wide compasses. Yet the S&P 500, that patched-together ledger of 500 behemoths, is taken as oracle. It claims to speak truth about America’s markets. Let us dissect its claims with a scalpel, not blind faith.
Created in March 1957, the index lists companies that meet metrics largely set by gatekeepers-profitability under arbitrary accounting rules, liquidity thresholds, and a $22.7 billion market cap. Additions arrive quarterly, often timed to Wall Street’s pocketbooks. Recently, firms like Carvana and Comfort Systems entered, as though their inclusion lends gravity to a market increasingly detached from its gravity.
The S&P 500’s 13.5% annual return (excluding dividends) is as credible as a tax accountant’s confession
Over the past decade, the index swelled 256% at 13.5% annualized, 323% with dividends. These numbers bristle with hindsight bias. The 30-year average-8.4% excluding dividends, 10.4% including-offers a truer baseline. Yet investors, like so many modern lemmings, chase the recent past as if it were law. A 13.5% return becomes dogma, while the 30-year consensus lies trampled, ignored.
The market’s wisdom? It resides in exchange-traded funds that bet on this illusion. Investors buy indexes like unopened books, hoping to inherit their future prose.
Wall Street’s 10% 2026 March
Nineteen banks and shops line up for 2026, penciling in a 10% average upside. Oppenheimer dreams of 17% growth; Bank of America whispers of conservatively 3%. They are all in the same cage, sharpening pencils that fail to predict. During 2020-2024, their median targets deviated by 18 percentage points, a margin that would shame a lottery vendor.
| Wall Street Firm | S&P 500 Target Price (2026) | Upside (Downside) |
|---|---|---|
| Oppenheimer | 8,100 | 17% |
| Deutsche Bank | 8,000 | 16% |
| Morgan Stanley | 7,800 | 13% |
| Seaport Research | 7,800 | 13% |
| Evercore | 7,750 | 12% |
| RBC Capital | 7,750 | 12% |
| Citigroup | 7,700 | 11% |
| Fundstrat | 7,700 | 11% |
| Yardeni Research | 7,700 | 11% |
| Goldman Sachs | 7,600 | 10% |
| HSBC | 7,500 | 8% |
| Jefferies | 7,500 | 8% |
| JPMorgan Chase | 7,500 | 8% |
| UBS | 7,500 | 8% |
| Wells Fargo | 7,500 | 8% |
| Barclays | 7,400 | 7% |
| BMO Capital | 7,400 | 7% |
| CFRA | 7,400 | 7% |
| Bank of America | 7,100 | 3% |
| Average | 7,616 | 10% |
Median targets lingered at 7,600-a 10% claim, yet the math of past misses howls in the background. Prediction is impossible, a truth too many institutions ignore for fear of appearing “unprofessional.” But fear and market forecasts are bedfellows yet to be separated by economics.
The illogical hope in AI-powered resilience and President Trump’s tariffs as transient noise? These are the new alibis for underwriting catastrophe. Tariffs may yet reveal themselves as clenched fists, not shared contracts. For now, indices dance to narrative rhythms-until they do not. 🐍
Read More
- 39th Developer Notes: 2.5th Anniversary Update
- Celebs Slammed For Hyping Diversity While Casting Only Light-Skinned Leads
- Game of Thrones author George R. R. Martin’s starting point for Elden Ring evolved so drastically that Hidetaka Miyazaki reckons he’d be surprised how the open-world RPG turned out
- Thinking Before Acting: A Self-Reflective AI for Safer Autonomous Driving
- Quentin Tarantino Reveals the Monty Python Scene That Made Him Sick
- Celebs Who Got Canceled for Questioning Pronoun Policies on Set
- Ethereum Flips Netflix: Crypto Drama Beats Binge-Watching! 🎬💰
- ONDO’s $840M Token Tsunami: Market Mayhem or Mermaid Magic? 🐚💥
- Games That Removed Content to Avoid Cultural Sensitivity Complaints
- Riot Platforms Sells $200M BTC: Funding AI or Desperation? 🤔
2026-01-10 11:14