Stablecoins: The Unsung Heroes of Crypto’s Grand Ball 🎩💰

by

CoinDesk Indices

Pray, Allow Me to Elucidate:

Good sir or madam, you are perusing Crypto Long & Short, our weekly missive brimming with insights, news, and analysis for the discerning investor. Do subscribe here to receive it in your digital repository each Wednesday, sans fail.

Stablecoins, my dear reader, are the true paragons of virtue in the realm of crypto. In the past six years, they have quietly ascended to indispensability. Since 2019, these modest tokens have facilitated the transfer of $264.5 trillion across 18 billion transactions. Why, you ask? They permit one to retain funds onchain without the vexation of volatility, rendering them the most expedient method to preserve value and transact in the crypto economy. A marvel, indeed! 🌟

Why are Stablecoins all the rage at present?

We observe a veritable stampede of companies launching stablecoins in the U.S., for issuers have at last obtained clarity with the passage of the GENIUS Act in July 2025. For the first time, the U.S. government has deigned to define who may issue stablecoins, what constitutes a “payment stablecoin,” and what obligations issuers owe to their patrons. A triumph of bureaucracy, if ever there was one! 📜

Since this legislative masterpiece was enacted, MetaMask unveiled mUSD, Stripe birthed a payments-focused chain dubbed Tempo, Circle proclaimed their purpose-built stablecoin payments L1, Arc Network, and there has been a frenzy of acquisitions. Stablecoin infrastructure companies like Iron are being snapped up with alacrity, and traditional finance firms like Stripe are lavishing funds to acquire crypto companies (Privy and Bridge) whose offerings they may integrate into their existing portfolios. A regular merry-go-round of commerce! 🎢

Moreover, chains are launching their own stablecoins in a bid to capture more revenue from the yield they generate. MegaETH boasts its native stablecoin, USDm. Hyperliquid introduced USDH, which ignited a bidding war with Paxos, Agora, Sky, and Frax all clamoring to participate. At this pace, one could envision a world where every self-respecting company in crypto issues its own stablecoin. Which begs the question: do we truly require more? 🤔

Why we require more Stablecoins:

1. Financial inclusion: Even as the number of unbanked souls diminishes, over 1.3 billion remain bereft of access to banking, chiefly in locales with unstable currencies. Stablecoins offer 24/7 access to funds online, sans borders. If companies like PayPal introduce stablecoins directly to their existing clientele, they could usher more individuals into the global money rails of crypto. A noble endeavor, is it not? 🌍

2. Currency diversity: In the real world, we are not confined to a single currency. We have dollars, euros, yen. The same ought to hold true onchain. If all transactions settle in dollars, the entire crypto economy becomes inextricably linked to U.S. monetary policy. More stablecoins signify less dependence on a solitary standard. Variety, after all, is the spice of life! 🌶️

3. Risk mitigation: Presently, stablecoin markets are concentrated in the hands of a few dominant players. With more stablecoins, concentration risk diminishes. Should one issuer encounter technical, regulatory, or solvency issues, users would have alternatives to which they could pivot without destabilizing the broader ecosystem. More issuers equate to more redundancy, rendering the system more secure. A prudent measure, would you not agree? 🔒

Stablecoins are quietly redrafting the rules of global finance. They grant anyone, anywhere, access to funds that move instantaneously, across borders, with incentives aligned to users rather than banks. The greater the competition, the better. If crypto is to transform the global economy, it shall not be due to speculation. It shall be because of stablecoins. And so, my dear reader, let us raise a virtual glass to these unsung heroes of the crypto world! 🥂

Read More

2025-09-17 22:05