SPGM vs. VT: A Whimsical Duel of ETFs for Canny Investors

by

Once upon a time in the grand bazaar of investment options, two contenders danced upon the market stage: the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT +0.84%) and the SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM +0.80%). While both promise to whisk investors on a global equity escapade, one boasts a staggering multitude of stocks-nearly four times as many-while the other tickles the taste buds of income-seekers with a plump dividend yield.

VT and SPGM have donned their finest attire to offer a splendid smorgasbord of global equity diversification, prancing across the fields of developed and emerging markets. VT, the elder statesman of total-market coverage, plays the wise old owl, while SPGM, the sprightly newcomer, brings a slightly skewed balance of sectors and a juicier yield to the table, making this tête-à-tête particularly delicious for those pondering their core portfolio ingredients.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric VT SPGM
Issuer Vanguard SPDR
Expense ratio 0.06% 0.09%
1-yr return (as of 2025-12-16) 16.8% 18.1%
Dividend yield 1.7% 2.8%
Beta 1.02 1.01
AUM $74.9 billion $1.3 billion

Ah, Beta! The capricious sprite that measures price wiggles in relation to the S&P 500, calculated from five years’ worth of weekly fancies. And let’s not forget, the one-year return is merely a snapshot of the past twelve months’ delightful ups and downs.

Now, SPGM may ask you for a smidgen more in recurring fees-a modest expense ratio of 0.09% compared to VT’s more generous 0.06%. However, it compensates with a rather enticing yield of 2.8%, dancing circles around VT’s humble 1.7%. This tasty titbit could make all the difference for those on the hunt for income, like a hungry child eyeing a cookie jar.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric VT SPGM
Max drawdown (5 y) -26.38% -25.92%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,665 $1,715

What’s inside

SPGM, with its curious collection of 2,838 companies, aims for a global embrace, wrapping its fingers around developed and emerging markets alike. Its sector mix, a veritable stew, features 25% technology, 18% financial services, and 12% industrials. The top dogs in this pack include the ever-famous Nvidia at 4.1%, the ubiquitous Apple at 3.9%, and the clever Microsoft at 3.4%. With a fourteen-year track record, SPGM promises stability but has an oddly concentrated portfolio, akin to a children’s book with only a few pages.

In stark contrast, VT presents a sprawling universe of 9,773 holdings, a cornucopia of choice, yet its allocation remains similar to that of SPGM. The familiar trio of Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft feature prominently here too, though each occupies a smaller share of the pie. This vast expanse may enchant those who cherish maximum diversification above all, like a child lost in a candy store.

What this means for investors

Since the year 2012, our two contenders have delivered almost identical annualized total returns-10.7% for SPGM and 10.5% for VT. They even share the same top three and top ten positions, though in VT’s case, these positions are just a tad less weighty. In conclusion, dear readers, these ETFs are remarkably similar, like two peas in a rather peculiar pod.

That said, my skeptical heart finds itself leaning towards SPGM, despite its slightly heftier expense ratio. First, the extra cost is more than compensated by SPGM’s delectable dividend yield of 2.8%, which stands out like a shiny apple in a barrel of dull potatoes. Additionally, SPGM has managed a delightful 12% annual growth in dividends over the last decade, compared to VT’s lackluster 5%. Yet, we mustn’t dismiss VT’s lower expenses and its breathtaking stock count which might just dazzle those seeking vast diversification at a bargain price. Ultimately, it comes down to the whims and fancies of the investor, for both stocks offer a splendid passage into the world of international equities.

Glossary

ETF: Exchange-Traded Fund, a magical basket of securities that dances around the stock exchanges.
Expense ratio: The annual fee gobbled up by a fund to cover its operational whims, expressed as a percentage of assets.
Dividend yield: The delectable morsels paid out by a fund or stock, served as a percentage of its price.
Beta: A measure of how much an investment jiggles compared to the overall market, often the S&P 500.
AUM: Assets Under Management; the total treasure hoard a fund manages for its investors.
Max drawdown: The most significant plummet from a fund’s peak value to its lowest pit over a specific span of time.
Sector mix: The delightful allocation of a fund’s investments across different industries or business sectors.
Emerging markets: Economies bustling with rapid growth and industrialization, often a bit more risky than their polished counterparts.
Developed markets: Economies with sturdy infrastructures, stable governments, and well-established financial systems.
Portfolio diversification: Spreading investments across various assets to keep risks at bay, like a hedgehog curling into a ball.
Total return: The investment’s price change plus all those lovely dividends and distributions, assuming they’re reinvested for future delights.
Holdings: The individual treasures-stocks, bonds, or other assets-owned by a fund.
For more whimsical guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

🧮

Read More

2025-12-21 15:53