Smart Routing for Electric Ride-Sharing

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new deep learning approach tackles the complex problem of efficiently dispatching electric vehicles for on-demand ride services.

The optimization model demonstrates a feasible solution for servicing pickup-delivery demands in San Francisco utilizing a fleet of seven vehicles, each strategically routed to incorporate necessary charging stops-a logistical necessity reflecting the inherent limitations of operational range and the practical realities of electric vehicle deployment.
The optimization model demonstrates a feasible solution for servicing pickup-delivery demands in San Francisco utilizing a fleet of seven vehicles, each strategically routed to incorporate necessary charging stops-a logistical necessity reflecting the inherent limitations of operational range and the practical realities of electric vehicle deployment.

This research introduces a deep graph reinforcement learning framework with an edge-based attention mechanism to optimize solutions for the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem.

Efficiently managing fleets of electric vehicles in on-demand ride-sharing presents a significant challenge due to complex constraints on battery capacity and dynamic service demands. This is addressed in ‘Learning to Dial-a-Ride: A Deep Graph Reinforcement Learning Approach to the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem’, which introduces a novel deep reinforcement learning framework leveraging edge-based graph neural networks to optimize routing, charging, and service quality. The approach achieves near-optimal solutions-within 0.4% of best-known results-while dramatically reducing computation times compared to traditional metaheuristics, even on large-scale instances with realistic energy models. Could this framework pave the way for more sustainable and efficient urban mobility systems in the face of growing demand?

The Illusion of Control: Scaling Beyond Simplification

Conventional approaches to the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem, which involves dynamically routing vehicles to fulfill ride requests, frequently falter when confronted with the intricacies of realistic urban environments. These methods often grapple with the sheer scale of potential routes and the need to account for fluctuating demands, traffic congestion, and the limited range of electric vehicle batteries. The combinatorial explosion of possibilities-each ride request adding exponentially to the complexity-quickly overwhelms traditional optimization techniques, forcing reliance on simplified models or suboptimal heuristics. Consequently, solutions generated by these methods often prove inefficient, leading to increased wait times, higher operational costs, and a diminished ability to serve all riders effectively, particularly in densely populated or rapidly changing conditions.

Many current solutions to the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem, while functional in controlled environments, falter when confronted with the unpredictability of real-world logistics. These methods frequently employ simplifying assumptions – such as fixed routes, predictable travel times, or limitations on vehicle capacity – to render the problem computationally tractable. However, this often comes at the cost of adaptability. Heuristics, though efficient, can become trapped in suboptimal solutions when faced with unexpected surges in demand, sudden road closures, or shifts in passenger locations. Consequently, these approaches struggle to dynamically adjust to changing conditions, leading to inefficient routing, increased wait times, and a diminished ability to serve all requests effectively. The reliance on these shortcuts ultimately hinders the scalability and robustness necessary for deploying such systems in complex, evolving urban landscapes.

The inherent difficulty in solving the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem at scale demands a move beyond traditional algorithmic approaches. Existing methods, often reliant on simplification, falter when faced with the intricacies of real-world transportation networks-networks defined by a vast number of interconnected nodes representing locations and edges symbolizing possible routes. While exact methods can theoretically yield optimal solutions, their computational cost increases exponentially with network complexity, rendering them impractical for large-scale deployments. Consequently, researchers are increasingly focused on developing algorithms capable of effectively reasoning over these complex networks, prioritizing scalability and adaptability without sacrificing solution quality-a shift towards techniques that can navigate the combinatorial explosion inherent in dynamic, real-time routing challenges.

Validation profit consistently converges across all twelve configurations, demonstrating stable performance with varying ride-sharing capacity (1-3 passengers per vehicle) and differing battery/fleet size combinations.
Validation profit consistently converges across all twelve configurations, demonstrating stable performance with varying ride-sharing capacity (1-3 passengers per vehicle) and differing battery/fleet size combinations.

The Network’s Anatomy: Prioritizing Connection

The GREAT Encoder is a graph neural network architecture specifically designed to ingest and process features directly associated with the edges of a graph. This contrasts with traditional graph neural networks which primarily focus on node attributes; GREAT prioritizes the characteristics of connections between locations. By directly incorporating edge features – such as distance, travel time, or energy cost – the model can represent relationships with greater fidelity. This approach enables the network to learn nuanced representations of the problem instance based on the connections themselves, rather than relying solely on the properties of individual nodes.

Traditional graph neural networks often prioritize node features, inferring relationships indirectly through node embeddings. The GREAT Encoder departs from this approach by directly processing edge features, representing connections between locations as primary data inputs. This focus on relationships allows the model to explicitly capture the nuances of inter-location dynamics, which is particularly beneficial for modeling variables like dynamic travel times and energy consumption that are inherently defined by the connections themselves. By directly encoding these relational characteristics, GREAT avoids the potential information loss associated with inferring them from node properties and facilitates a more accurate representation of the underlying system.

The GREAT Encoder’s edge-centric design facilitates a more efficient encoding of problem instances by directly incorporating feature data associated with connections between locations, rather than focusing solely on node attributes. This approach yields performance gains because it prioritizes the relationships that directly impact calculations of dynamic travel times and energy consumption. Benchmarking demonstrates that this encoding strategy achieves a 7200x speedup compared to exact methods used for solving the same problem instances, indicating a substantial reduction in computational complexity and improved scalability.

Learning to Navigate: From State to Action

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is utilized to develop a policy for vehicle routing decisions, leveraging the output of the GREAT Encoder as input. The GREAT Encoder transforms each problem instance – detailing passenger requests, vehicle capacities, and energy limitations – into a fixed-length vector representation. This encoded instance serves as the state observation for the DRL agent. The agent then learns a policy – a mapping from states to actions – through trial and error, interacting with a simulated environment to maximize cumulative rewards. This approach enables the agent to generalize learned strategies across a range of problem instances, effectively automating the decision-making process for complex vehicle routing scenarios.

The Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agent operates by iteratively selecting actions to construct a vehicle routing solution. At each step, the agent considers the current state – encompassing passenger locations, vehicle capacities, and remaining energy – and chooses an action representing a routing decision, such as assigning a passenger to a specific vehicle or determining the next location for a vehicle to visit. This sequential decision-making process is optimized through interaction with the environment, where each action results in a state transition and a corresponding reward signal. The cumulative reward, reflecting both efficiency in route completion and minimization of operational costs, drives the agent’s learning process, enabling it to develop a policy for effective vehicle routing.

The reward function utilized in the Deep Reinforcement Learning framework is parameterized to prioritize both passenger demand fulfillment and energy consumption limitations. Positive rewards are assigned for successfully servicing passenger requests, while penalties are incurred for exceeding energy budget constraints or failing to meet demand. This design incentivizes the agent to discover routes that maximize passenger throughput within the available energy resources. Empirical results demonstrate that policies trained with this reward function achieve a 9.5% improvement in solution quality, as measured by a composite metric of fulfilled requests and minimized energy expenditure, when compared to solutions generated by the Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS) heuristic.

The Illusion of Progress: Guiding the Learning Process

Curriculum Learning presents a novel approach to enhancing the training of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents, addressing common challenges related to efficiency and stability. Rather than exposing the agent to the full complexity of the routing problem immediately, this strategy initiates training with simpler problem instances, gradually increasing the difficulty as the agent demonstrates proficiency. This phased learning process mirrors human educational techniques, allowing the agent to build a foundational understanding before tackling more intricate scenarios. By systematically progressing from easy to hard examples, the agent avoids getting trapped in local optima and converges to an optimal policy more reliably, ultimately resulting in a faster and more robust learning experience.

The agent’s ability to master complex tasks is significantly enhanced through a carefully structured learning progression, mirroring how humans acquire skills. Instead of immediately confronting the full challenge, the system begins with simplified problem instances – essentially, easier versions of the routing task. As the agent successfully navigates these initial scenarios, the complexity is gradually increased, introducing more intricate network configurations and request patterns. This progressive approach fosters a robust understanding of the underlying principles, allowing the agent to generalize its learning to previously unseen scenarios with greater efficiency. By building upon a foundation of simpler concepts, the system avoids becoming overwhelmed and can more effectively extrapolate solutions to novel, more challenging problems, ultimately leading to improved performance and adaptability.

The implementation of a curriculum learning strategy demonstrably accelerates the development of effective routing policies. Through systematic progression from simpler to more complex problem instances, the agent not only learns more efficiently but also achieves robust performance on challenging benchmark datasets. Specifically, this approach yields a 100% completion rate across standard instances, indicating reliable solution-finding capabilities. Furthermore, even when confronted with larger, 50-request instances, the resulting policies maintain a remarkably small optimality gap of just 0.40%, suggesting near-optimal routing decisions and a substantial improvement over traditional reinforcement learning methods.

The pursuit of efficient solutions to complex logistical problems, as demonstrated in this research on the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem, reveals a fundamental truth about human modeling. Every hypothesis is an attempt to make uncertainty feel safe. The framework presented, utilizing deep reinforcement learning and graph neural networks, isn’t merely about optimizing routes; it’s about creating a predictive structure to alleviate the anxiety inherent in managing a dynamic system. This research, with its edge-based attention mechanisms, embodies the need to translate real-world complexities into manageable, quantifiable variables. Niels Bohr once said, “Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.” This holds true – the model doesn’t eliminate uncertainty, it merely shifts the burden of managing it from intuition to algorithm, a move born from a deep-seated hope for control.

Where to Next?

This work, like all attempts to optimize complex systems, skirts the central issue: the problem isn’t the routing, it’s the riders. Humans don’t demand efficient transport; they demand acceptable delays, and are remarkably inconsistent in defining what constitutes acceptability. The algorithm can shave milliseconds off an estimated time of arrival, but cannot account for the passenger who misjudges their readiness, or the sudden, irrational preference for a different route based on a fleeting mood. The efficiency gains are real, but predicated on a fantasy of rational actors.

Future iterations will undoubtedly focus on incorporating more ‘realistic’ behavioral models. However, simply adding layers of probabilistic noise – simulating ‘human error’ – misses the point. The errors aren’t random; they are predictable biases. The algorithm will improve at anticipating which irrational choices a passenger might make, not at eliminating them. It will learn to build buffers for vanity, for procrastination, for the simple human need to feel in control, even when control is illusory.

The true challenge lies not in solving the Electric Dial-a-Ride Problem, but in acknowledging that it is, at its core, a problem of applied psychology, disguised as combinatorial optimization. The next step isn’t better graph neural networks, but a deeper understanding of why people consistently choose inconvenience over optimal solutions. The system doesn’t need to be smarter, just more accommodating of predictable foolishness.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.22052.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-02-01 21:44