Rule Breakers, Rebalanced: Three Lessons from the Alchemy of Wealth

by

In the hallowed halls of the Guild of Alchemists and Venture Capitalists1, where wizards in pinstripe robes mutter incantations over balance sheets, David Gardner has penned a tome titled Rule Breaker Investing. This grimoire, it is said, contains the secret spells that have allowed its author to outwit the S&P 500 for nearly three decades-a feat akin to herding cats into a stock market index. The Rule Breakers, a sect known for their disdain of conventional wisdom, offer three particularly pungent lessons for those brave enough to wander off the well-trodden path of financial orthodoxy.

Add up, Don’t Double Down (Or, How to Outwit the Witch’s Broomstick)

The ancient adage “buy low, sell high” is like a witch’s broomstick: everyone knows it’s the answer, but few question whether the question makes sense. Rule Breakers, however, prefer to “add up, don’t double down”-a strategy that sounds like advice from a gamblers’ guild but is, in fact, a masterstroke of psychological alchemy. By focusing on buying more of your winners rather than sweating the sale, Gardner suggests we should “buy high and try not to sell”2. It’s the financial equivalent of telling a dragon you’re not interested in its treasure-but then accepting it anyway because you’re too polite to refuse.

This approach defies the intuitive urge to pour good money after bad, a habit that has ruined more investors than the Black Plague. Instead, Rule Breakers argue that winning stocks tend to keep winning, much like a particularly stubborn weed in a monastery garden. As Gardner quips, “Good money after good is the only kind that grows on trees-or in portfolios.”

“Overvalued” (Or, Why Wall Street Needs a Reality Check)

To the numerologists of Wall Street, a stock’s worth is measured in ratios, multiples, and other abstractions that would make a Discworld lich weep. Yet Rule Breakers embrace the “overvalued” label like a blacksmith embraces fire. This is not madness, but a calculated rebellion against a system that forgets that brands, management, and corporate culture are the real engines of value3. As Gardner observes, “There are no numbers for the things that matter most-unless you count the number of times your CEO has been fired.”

In the Department of Numerical Valuation and Its Discontents4, a stock’s price-to-earnings ratio is treated like a sacred text. But what of the intangible magic-the whisper of a brand name in a customer’s ear, the quiet confidence of a management team that knows how to juggle flaming swords? These are the true alchemical inputs, and they rarely show up on a spreadsheet.

Fair Starting Line (Or, The Great Equine Racing Analogy)

Gardner’s final lesson borrows from the horse races of Ankh-Morpork, where every steed lines up at the same gate regardless of its odds. In portfolio construction, this means giving each stock an equal starting stake-a radical idea in a world obsessed with “high conviction” and “position sizing.” Why, you ask? Because in the Discworld of investing, no one knows which horse will bolt ahead or which will trip over its own hooves. The 80-1 long shot might just become your next golden retriever of a stock5.

But here’s the kicker: unlike horse racing, you can add jockeys mid-race. As the market gallops forward, you can reinforce your leading positions while cutting losses on the duds. It’s a system that rewards patience, adaptability, and a healthy disregard for the “obvious.”

And so, dear reader, we return to the eternal question: why do we trust numbers more than we trust people? Perhaps it’s time to trade in our calculators for quills and start scribbling a few rules of our own. 🏇

Read More

2025-11-10 21:33