Rigetti: A Quantum Leap… Toward Nowhere?

Now, I’ve seen a good many bubbles in my time – land speculation in Missouri, tulipomania over in Europe, and more recently, these “disruptive” technologies folks are so keen on. And let me tell you, most of ’em amount to little more than a fancy way to separate a man from his hard-earned coin. This Rigetti Computing, though… well, it’s a particularly curious case. They’re chasing this quantum computing dream, which, to a simple fellow like myself, sounds like trying to build a clock out of smoke and mirrors. And the chances of it actually working? About as good as a snowball’s chance in July.

You see, a company that’s all in on one thing – a “pure play,” as they call it – is like a man with all his eggs in a single, rather fragile basket. If that basket holds, you might just have an omelet. If it doesn’t… well, you’ve got a mess to clean up. Rigetti’s betting the whole farm on quantum computing, and that’s a mighty risky proposition. They claim to be on the cutting edge, but sometimes the sharpest edges are the ones that cut you.

They’ve been spending money, too – a prodigious amount, I might add. In the last quarter, they took in a mere $1.9 million, yet managed to lose a cool $20.5 million. Now, I’m no mathematician, but that seems… unsustainable. They claim it’s expected for a company in its early stages, but I reckon a leaky bucket is a leaky bucket, no matter how fancy the paint job. They’ve got about $600 million stashed away, which sounds like a fortune, but money has a way of vanishing faster than a politician’s promise.

And then there’s the matter of DARPA – the government folks who like to tinker with things. Rigetti went courting them, hoping for a big contract, but got shown the door after the first round. That’s a clear sign they aren’t leading the pack, and in this race, the leaders are the ones who get the spoils. Investors, being the discerning sort they are, tend to favor the frontrunners. It’s like betting on horses – you put your money on the one that’s most likely to win, not the one that’s trailing behind, covered in mud.

So, is Rigetti destined to become another footnote in the history of failed ventures? Perhaps. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least. There are other companies in this quantum space – IonQ, for instance – that seem to be on more solid footing. They’ve got a bit more going for them, a bit more… substance. If you’re looking to gamble on this quantum future, I’d suggest you start there. But even then, remember this: there’s a reason why they call it a gamble.

Now, if you’re a cautious sort – and I always recommend caution – you might consider one of these quantum computing ETFs. They spread your risk around, so you’re not relying on a single, fragile company. It’s like diversifying your crops – if one field fails, you still have others to fall back on. A sensible approach, if you ask me. After all, a man should protect his wealth, not throw it away on a fool’s errand.

2026-01-26 18:02

Read More