Quantum Fancies: IonQ & D-Wave

by

The pursuit of fortune in the realm of quantum computing is, shall we say, a most peculiar amusement. Both IonQ and D-Wave Quantum, those hopeful aspirants in this nascent field, offer a spectacle of ambition and expenditure. To invest in them is to wager on a future that remains, at best, a shimmering illusion. Still, illusions are often the most profitable ventures, aren’t they?

One must remember that these companies dare to challenge the established order—the behemoths of Alphabet and IBM—and such audacity always comes at a price. The question, therefore, is not merely which company possesses the superior technology, but which is more adept at the art of captivating investors – a skill, I assure you, far more valuable than mere innovation.

The Case for IonQ: A Touch of Elegance

IonQ, with its self-proclaimed leadership, reminds one of a particularly confident dandy – all pronouncements and polished appearances. Their breakthroughs in electronic qubit control are, admittedly, impressive, though one suspects the true magic lies in their marketing department. To achieve “record-breaking two-qubit gate fidelity” is merely to refine an error; to eliminate it, however, would be a feat worthy of legend.

The fact that companies like Microsoft and AstraZeneca deign to collaborate with them is a testament not so much to the technology itself, but to the allure of novelty. Everyone, it seems, desires a glimpse into the future, even if that future proves to be disappointingly mundane.

Financially, IonQ is, predictably, a creature of deficit. Losses are, of course, the price of progress—or, more accurately, the price of maintaining a convincing façade. A negative free cash flow of $216 million in nine months is a sum that would make even a profligate prince blush, yet they continue to spend with an admirable lack of restraint. Dilution of shares—a 59% increase—is merely the necessary cost of sustaining the game.

Loading widget...

Fortunately, they possess a liquidity of nearly $1.1 billion, affording them a few more rounds of this expensive dance. A comforting sum, though one suspects it will vanish with the same swiftness as a reputation in a scandal. Valuation metrics are, naturally, irrelevant for a company that generates no profit. A P/S ratio of 130 is a mathematical absurdity, and a price-to-book ratio of 7 merely suggests they are selling dreams at a reasonable price.

D-Wave Quantum: The Pragmatist’s Gamble

D-Wave Quantum, in contrast, presents itself as the “practical” quantum computing company. A rather pedestrian claim, but one that appeals to those who prefer substance over style. Their advancements in multiplexing and bump bonding—technical terms that sound suspiciously like ailments—are undoubtedly clever, though their ultimate impact remains to be seen.

Partnerships with Volkswagen and Mastercard suggest a degree of commercial viability, though one suspects these collaborations are more about hedging bets than achieving technological breakthroughs. After all, it is always prudent to appear innovative, even if one is merely funding someone else’s fantasies.

Like IonQ, D-Wave Quantum is far from profitable. A negative free cash flow of $56 million and a 20% increase in outstanding shares are hardly signs of a thriving enterprise. Yet, the stock has inexplicably risen by 400% over the past year. A testament, perhaps, to the power of irrational exuberance—or, more likely, a masterful manipulation of public perception.

Loading widget...

A P/S ratio of 275 is, quite frankly, an insult to mathematics, and a price-to-book ratio of 12 merely confirms that they are selling hope at a premium. Still, it is low enough to attract the attention of those who believe that a rising tide lifts all yachts—even those constructed of cardboard.

The Choice: A Matter of Taste, Not Logic

Ultimately, both stocks are speculative ventures, suitable only for those with a penchant for risk and a healthy disregard for logic. To invest in either is to embrace the possibility of ruin—a prospect that, for some, is strangely exhilarating.

If forced to choose, however, I would lean towards IonQ. D-Wave Quantum’s recent gains are, undoubtedly, impressive, but they also suggest that the opportunity may have passed. IonQ, with its lower valuation and its commitment to quantum advancement, offers a more intriguing—and potentially more rewarding—gamble. After all, a little extravagance is always preferable to vulgar excess.

One should remember, however, that fortune favors the bold—and the impeccably dressed.

Read More

2026-02-02 14:34