QLD vs. SSO: A Tale of Two Leveraged Larks

by

Imagine, if you will, two society balls hosted on the same glittering evening-one by the Nasdaq-100 crowd, the other by the S&P 500 syndicate. Both [QLD 0.08%] and [SSO 0.23%] promise double the merriment of their respective indexes, yet their charms diverge like clashing dinner guests at a particularly lively country house weekend.

A Glimpse at the Coin Purse

SSO

Metric QLD
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Expense ratio 0.87% 0.95%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 1, 2025) 18.32% 32.48%
Dividend yield 0.72% 0.18%
Beta (5Y monthly) 2.02 2.22
AUM $7.7 billion $9.9 billion

SSO, ever the thrifty host, charges a mere 0.87% for its services-akin to a butler’s modest tip-while QLD’s 0.95% demands a touch more from one’s pocketbook. Yet for those craving the occasional dividend trifle, SSO’s 0.72% yield offers a sweeter nibble than QLD’s meager 0.18% crumb.

Volatility: The Dance of the Market Minuet

Metric SSO QLD
Max drawdown (5 y) -46.73% -63.68%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,725 $2,736

One might liken their performances to a pair of waltzing hedge fund managers: SSO glides with stately restraint, while QLD executes a series of daring pirouettes, occasionally stumbling but landing with a flourish. The latter’s 63% drawdown would make a less stout-hearted investor clutch their pearls, though its $2,736 crescendo outshines SSO’s $2,725 encore.

The Guests at the Feast

QLD, the tech-obsessed aesthete, devotes 55% of its portfolio to silicon valley’s glitterati-Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft chief among them-like a debutante smitten with the latest dashing inventor. SSO, meanwhile, spreads its affections broadly across 503 holdings, its 35% tech allocation tempered by a dash of industrials and a smattering of consumer staples.

Both funds reset their leverage daily, a financial parlor trick that can turn a five-year ballad into a cacophonous opera if left to the whims of volatile markets. Think of it as a butler adjusting one’s cravat every morning-delightfully precise, yet potentially disconcerting over time.

The Jeevesian Verdict

For the gentleman investor seeking thrills without excessive perspiration, SSO offers a steadier hand-like a Rolls-Royce piloted by a sober chauffeur. QLD, however, caters to the chap who’d rather race a Bugatti through a monsoon, shouting “Bravo!” with every skid. The former’s 18% annual return may seem as quaint as a vicar’s tea party compared to QLD’s 32%, but its broader diversification whispers promises of sleep-uninterrupted nights.

In this eternal dance of risk and reward, one must ask: Does your constitution crave the steady hum of a diversified engine, or the electric crackle of tech’s Tesla coil? The answer, dear investor, shall determine whether you waltz away with SSO or tango recklessly into the night with QLD. 📈

The Lexicon for the Perplexed Investor

ETF: A chameleon-like fund that masquerades as both stock and portfolio, trading on exchanges with the flair of a West End actor.
Leverage: The financial equivalent of hiring a team of monkeys to push your yacht upwind-doubly effective, doubly chaotic.
2x daily leveraged exposure: A magical spell that conjures double the daily returns of an index, though it occasionally misfires like a mischievous firework.
Beta: A measure of how much the fund’s pulse quickens in a market tempest, rated on a scale from “napping tortoise” to “startled gazelle.”

Read More

2025-12-01 21:33