Predicting Pasture: Deep Learning Forecasts Irish Grass Growth

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new approach to forecasting perennial ryegrass growth leverages the power of deep learning for optimized grassland management.

Ryegrass, subjected to the predictable rhythms of the months, demonstrates a growth pattern destined to plateau, a temporary flourishing inevitably constrained by inherent limitations.
Ryegrass, subjected to the predictable rhythms of the months, demonstrates a growth pattern destined to plateau, a temporary flourishing inevitably constrained by inherent limitations.

Temporal Convolutional Networks demonstrate superior performance compared to traditional time series models like ARIMA, LSTM, and GRU in predicting grass growth in Ireland.

While grasslands represent a vital terrestrial carbon sink and support crucial biodiversity, accurately forecasting grass growth remains a challenge for sustainable agricultural practices. This is addressed in ‘Applying Time Series Deep Learning Models to Forecast the Growth of Perennial Ryegrass in Ireland’, which proposes deep learning models—specifically Temporal Convolutional Networks—as cost-effective alternatives to traditional mechanistic approaches. Results demonstrate that TCNs significantly outperform established time series models like ARIMA, LSTM, and GRU in forecasting Perennial Ryegrass growth, achieving RMSE of 2.74 and MAE of 3.46. Could these findings pave the way for more resilient and profitable dairy farming systems through improved grassland management?

The Illusion of Predictable Pastures

Accurate grass growth prediction is vital for sustainable land management, directly impacting livestock capacity and environmental sustainability. Reliable forecasts enable proactive grazing, fertilization, and feed strategies. Traditional time series methods struggle with real-world data’s complexity, failing to account for seasonality, extreme weather, and climate trends. Consequently, their accuracy diminishes rapidly. The inherent non-linearity of these systems demands sophisticated tools; advanced machine learning offers improved capabilities, allowing for adaptation and more robust predictions.

Weekly grass height at Moorepark varied over the 32-year period from 1982 to 2013, demonstrating long-term trends in pasture growth.
Weekly grass height at Moorepark varied over the 32-year period from 1982 to 2013, demonstrating long-term trends in pasture growth.

Every prediction is a promise made to the past, a fragile assertion against a system that will always surprise us.

The Weight of Stationarity

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) models were implemented and compared for grass growth forecasting. These models require input data to be ‘stationary’—consistent statistical properties over time—often necessitating careful preprocessing to remove trends or seasonality. To further enhance performance and accelerate training, MinMax normalization was applied to scale the data, preventing any single feature from unduly influencing the learning process.

The Superiority of Convolutional Time

The temporal convolutional network (TCN) model was evaluated against recurrent and traditional time series methods. Results demonstrate that the TCN consistently outperformed LSTM, GRU, and MLP, achieving a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 2.74 and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 3.46.

The temporal convolutional network (TCN) model utilizes two layers, a kernel size of 2, and dilations of 1, 2, and 4 to process sequential data.
The temporal convolutional network (TCN) model utilizes two layers, a kernel size of 2, and dilations of 1, 2, and 4 to process sequential data.

The TCN’s ability to capture long-range dependencies proved crucial for accurate predictions, unlike recurrent models which struggle with vanishing gradients. Comparative analysis revealed that the TCN outperformed the ARIMA model by 48.4% in RMSE and 15.0% in MAE, highlighting its significant improvement over traditional methods.

Beyond the Sequence: Grafting Knowledge

Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs) have demonstrated strong forecasting performance. This work extends the TCN model by integrating concepts from Knowledge Graphs, leveraging contextual information beyond the immediate time series. The integration of Knowledge Graphs allows for the incorporation of external factors—soil composition, weather patterns, land management—providing a more holistic understanding and more robust predictions. The potential applications extend beyond grass growth, offering a valuable framework for forecasting in various environmental and agricultural contexts. Every architecture promises freedom until it demands DevOps sacrifices.

The pursuit of predictive accuracy in grassland management, as demonstrated by the application of Temporal Convolutional Networks, inevitably reveals the limitations inherent in any model. A system striving for perfect foresight is, in effect, a system denying its own evolution. Vinton Cerf observed, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” This sentiment applies directly to the TCN’s performance; while appearing to magically predict grass growth, it is simply a complex articulation of past data—a temporary respite before the inevitable divergence of prediction from reality. The value isn’t in eliminating error, but in understanding how the system will fail, and designing for graceful adaptation. A system that never breaks is, indeed, a dead one, incapable of responding to the subtle shifts in the agricultural ecosystem.

What’s Next?

The demonstrated efficacy of Temporal Convolutional Networks against established methods is less a triumph of architectural ingenuity, and more a predictable consequence of shifting the burden of compromise. Each model – ARIMA, LSTM, GRU – represents a prior attempt to constrain the inherent chaos of biological systems. TCNs, with their capacity for parallel processing and extended receptive fields, merely postpone the inevitable confrontation with unmodeled variables. The grassland will not conform to the forecast, however precise.

Future work will undoubtedly explore hybrid models, attempts to graft the strengths of each approach onto a new, ostensibly more robust, foundation. This is the nature of the field: endless refinement of tools built on fundamentally flawed assumptions. The true challenge lies not in improving predictive accuracy, but in accepting the limitations of prediction itself. Data, after all, is a map, not the territory.

Perhaps a more fruitful avenue lies in shifting focus from forecasting growth to understanding the system’s resilience – its capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Technologies change, dependencies remain. The grassland persists regardless of the algorithm employed. It is a system that grows itself, and any model is simply a fleeting reflection of that growth – a snapshot destined to be superseded by the next observation.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.03749.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-11-10 04:19