Precious Metal Contingencies

by

The iShares Gold Trust (IAU 0.51%) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT 4.30%) present themselves as avenues for participation in the ostensibly secure realm of precious metals. However, to designate either as a straightforward investment is to misunderstand the fundamental nature of such undertakings. They are, rather, exercises in the deferral of uncertainty, a temporary postponement of the inevitable reckoning with the void. One offers a slightly less onerous fee structure; the other, a more pronounced, yet ultimately illusory, sense of gain. The distinction, in the grand scheme, is negligible.

Both funds facilitate access to physical metals—gold, a historical repository of value, and platinum, a metal burdened by industrial application and therefore, contingency. This comparison, mandated by bureaucratic necessity, will examine cost, performance, and a peculiar metric known as ‘risk,’ as if such a thing could be quantified or controlled. It is a futile endeavor, yet one must proceed, lest the paperwork remain incomplete.

Snapshot (Cost & Size)

Metric IAU PPLT
Issuer iShares Aberdeen Investments
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.60%
1-yr return (as of 2026-01-09) 67.2% 135.6%
Beta 0.51 0.89
AUM $68.8 billion $2.86 billion

The expense ratio of IAU, while marginally lower, represents merely a slightly diminished claim on future, uncertain returns. The sheer scale of its assets under management, however, suggests a wider distribution of this deferral, a collective delusion shared by a greater number of participants. It does not, of course, alter the fundamental equation.

Performance & Risk Comparison

Metric IAU PPLT
Max drawdown (5 y) -21.82% -35.73%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $2,414 $2,133

The ‘max drawdown’ is presented as a measure of ‘risk.’ It is, in reality, an acknowledgement of the inescapable tendency towards diminishment. All things decay. All investments, eventually, lose value. The numbers merely quantify the rate of this inevitable process.

What’s Inside

PPLT is designed to provide exposure to platinum, a metal whose value is inextricably linked to the vagaries of industrial demand and the unpredictable actions of a few dominant suppliers. It offers a straightforward, if ultimately illusory, sense of control. The fund’s lack of detailed reporting is not a virtue, but a consequence of its singular focus – a relentless pursuit of a single, fleeting value.

IAU, similarly, provides exposure to physical gold. The reported sector breakdown of “Real Estate 100%” is a bureaucratic anomaly, a phantom classification assigned to a fund that holds nothing but inert metal. It is a reminder that systems, even those designed to quantify value, are prone to inexplicable errors.

For further guidance on ETF investing, consult the designated resource, although it is doubtful that any amount of information can truly alleviate the underlying anxiety.

What This Means for Investors

Both ETFs benefited from the anomalous surge in precious metals during 2025, a period characterized by artificially suppressed interest rates and widespread inflationary fears. Platinum, however, experienced an additional, temporary boost due to supply disruptions and speculative interest in hydrogen fuel cells. This is not a sustainable trend, merely a fleeting distortion in the otherwise predictable patterns of the market.

IAU holds physical gold in secure vaults, tracking the spot price less a small, but persistent, claim. With approximately $70 billion in assets, it is one of the largest such funds, a testament to the collective desire for security, however illusory. Gold delivered approximately 70% returns over the past year, a temporary reprieve from the relentless march of entropy.

PPLT stores platinum in London vaults at a higher annual cost, a premium levied for the privilege of participating in a more volatile, and therefore more precarious, market. Platinum’s 151% one-year return is an anomaly, a statistical outlier that should not be mistaken for a reliable indicator of future performance.

For those who prioritize stability, IAU offers a marginally lower cost of deferral, coupled with greater liquidity. Gold’s historical acceptance as a monetary asset provides a temporary illusion of security. However, even gold is subject to the laws of physics and the whims of human behavior. Consider PPLT only if you believe that industrial demand and supply constraints will continue to drive platinum higher, but understand that you are accepting a significantly greater degree of uncertainty. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, merely a record of past illusions.

Glossary

ETF: Exchange-traded fund that trades on stock exchanges and typically tracks an index or asset.
Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average assets.
Assets under management (AUM): Total market value of all assets a fund or manager oversees for investors.
1-yr return: Percentage gain or loss an investment produced over the most recent 12-month period.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus any income, assuming all payouts are reinvested.
Max drawdown: Largest peak-to-trough decline in an investment’s value over a specified time period.
Beta: Measure of an investment’s volatility compared with a benchmark, often the S&P 500 index.
Physical precious metals ETF: Fund that holds bullion, like gold or platinum, rather than mining stocks or futures contracts.
Futures contracts: Agreements to buy or sell an asset at a set price on a future date.
Equity holdings: Ownership stakes in companies’ stocks held within a fund’s portfolio.
Sector breakdown: Classification of a fund’s holdings by industry or economic sector to show portfolio concentration.
Leverage (in funds): Use of borrowed money or derivatives to amplify a fund’s exposure and potential returns or losses.

Read More

2026-01-17 14:03