Trading volume hit 57.9 million shares. That’s nearly 19% above average, meaning a lot of people are either very optimistic or very bored. It’s been a wild ride since 1980, with a 205494% increase. Which, honestly, feels less like investing and more like winning the lottery repeatedly. Someone should probably check the fine print.
This AI business has sent a shiver through the growth stocks, especially those that rely on spending enormous sums. But there was a glimmer of good news: Amazon (AMZN +1.19%) finally stopped its downward slide. It had been tumbling for days, you see, after announcing it intended to spend a truly monstrous amount of money on… well, on more machines. A sensible company would have bought a nice holiday for its employees, but no. Machines! Snowflake (SNOW 2.73%) took a bit of a tumble itself, poor thing, after Google unveiled a rather boastful ‘BigQuery.’ Meanwhile, Apple (AAPL +3.17%) and GE Aerospace (GE +3.61%) did their best to prop up the Dow, like sturdy little pillars.
The S&P 500, a broad and often indifferent observer of these dramas, added a modest 0.10%, finishing at 6,843. The Nasdaq Composite, ever the more excitable sibling, managed a 0.14% rise, closing at 22,578. But within the intricate tapestry of e-commerce and cloud computing, a subtle discord played out. Alibaba Group, a distant cousin in this digital family, closed at $155.43, down a fractional 0.19%. Walmart, a more grounded competitor, fared worse, shedding 3.76% to finish at $128.85. It was a reminder that in this arena, fortunes are rarely shared equally, and that even the most carefully laid plans can be disrupted by the capricious winds of investor sentiment. The divergence spoke volumes – a quiet acknowledgement that risk and reward are not always aligned, and that the pursuit of growth often demands a delicate balancing act.
By the end of the trading day, the price had increased by more than 7%. A perfectly respectable number, if you’re keeping score. Which, of course, somebody is.
It’s been going up for a week, apparently. A week! Like that makes it…stable? I saw a chart. A chart. They always look so…optimistic. It’s like they’re deliberately trying to mislead you. And everyone’s analyzing it. Assessing the “momentum.” The momentum. As if crypto has any actual momentum beyond sheer, unadulterated speculation.
On February 13, 2026, the aforementioned LM Asset Management, Inc. increased its position in Goodyear by 1,170,000 shares. The calculation of this increase, based on the closing prices of a previous quarter, feels less like a determination of value and more like an attempt to impose order on a fundamentally chaotic market. The fund’s total Goodyear stake reached 1,680,000 shares, an increase of $10.90 million, a figure that seems substantial until one considers the vastness of the sums that flow through these channels, disappearing into an unknowable elsewhere.
On X, Lawant waxed poetic about the CME Bitcoin basis, a metric so arcane it might as well be a hieroglyphic. “The carry trade?” he scoffed, “It’s vanished faster than a Ponzi scheme at a tax audit.” In a world where leverage once danced like fireflies, now only the ghost of leverage remains, whispering to tombstones in the derivatives graveyard.
The whispers, of course, concern artificial intelligence. The notion that these silicon minds might render decades of enterprise software obsolete. A rather dramatic pronouncement, wouldn’t you agree? Yet, the market, that fickle beast, responds to such anxieties with a swift and merciless pruning. Oracle, however, is attempting to position itself as a provider of the very infrastructure upon which these digital deities will reside. A curious strategy, akin to selling shovels during a gold rush, though with considerably more zeroes involved.
Let me tell you, no fewer than ten analysts decided Wendy’s was suddenly less appetizing than a week-old bagel. Ten! That’s a whole minyan of pessimism. And these weren’t just any analysts, mind you. We’re talking about the big kahunas at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Christine Cho at Goldman lowered her target from $8 to a measly $7—practically pennies, folks!—while still advising folks to sell. Sell! The nerve! Brian Harbour at Morgan Stanley did the same, snipping his target to $8. It’s like they’re all auditioning for a role in a tragic play.
For years and years – since 1957, can you believe it? – this index has been growing at a rate of 10.6% a year. Not bad, eh? Though last year it went a bit bonkers, shooting up 17.8% thanks to a new craze called ‘Artificial Intelligence’ – machines pretending to be clever. It’s had a bit of a wobble recently, but it’s still awfully close to its highest ever point. A bit like a wobbly jelly, really.