
ISCG, the more expansive of the two, casts a wide net, scooping up nearly a thousand companies. It’s a grand gesture, a claim to encompass the full spectrum of small-cap ambition. But breadth, without discernment, is a dangerous thing. It’s like opening the doors to everyone and hoping for the best – a recipe for chaos, and for the inevitable fall of those least prepared. IJT, by contrast, is more selective, drawing from the S&P SmallCap 600. It demands a degree of profitability, a sign that these companies aren’t simply chasing dreams, but are, at least, capable of sustaining themselves. It’s a small gatekeeper, a modest attempt to separate the wheat from the chaff.