‘Outlander’s’ Diana Gabaldon Weighs In On Season 7 Changes – Penultimate Episode Has A Major Book Callback Fans Won’t Want To Miss

by

As a dedicated fan and avid reader of Diana Gabaldon‘s works, I can’t help but marvel at her unique perspective on the adaptation of ‘Outlander.’ It’s fascinating to see her blend historical accuracy with creative flair while maintaining the essence of her characters.

The way she meticulously researches and incorporates actual words from letters or journals of historical figures is truly commendable, adding an authentic touch to her writing. However, I can understand why the show’s writers need to condense dialogue for time constraints, even if it means a few historically inaccurate or overly modern phrases slip through now and then.

What I find particularly intriguing is Gabaldon’s approach to dialogue for real historical figures. It’s like she’s not just writing a story; she’s bringing these long-gone characters back to life, capturing their personalities and speaking styles with an artist’s precision. And yet, the show’s writers have to walk a fine line between accuracy and practicality.

It’s a delicate dance, one that I believe Gabaldon handles with grace and humor, as evidenced by her light-hearted remarks about historical figures not being available for script consultations! I can just imagine her chuckling over the idea of Benedict Arnold popping in to discuss his lines. After all, if he could betray Fort Ticonderoga, surely he could help with a few dialogue changes!

As a devoted movie reviewer, I’m thrilled to share some exciting news about the captivating series ‘Outlander’. We’re now into part 2 of its second season, and the penultimate episode of Season 7, airing on January 3, 2025, is a heartfelt homage to Diana Gabaldon’s enchanting books. Named “Written in My Own Heart’s Blood,” this episode takes its title from Gabaldon’s eighth novel, promising a faithful adaptation that will surely delight fans.

In keeping with a tradition from previous seasons, this season’s episodes have been titled based on the author’s books, such as “Dragonfly in Amber” and “The Fiery Cross.” Most recently, the author herself penned an episode for the series and expressed her thoughts about the process.

In the upcoming episode, the title is inspired by the eighth book. This doesn’t necessarily imply that the storyline will mirror the book entirely. Yet, it suggests that significant incidents from the novel could unfold before the season concludes.

In the latest ‘Outlander’ installment titled “Ye Dinna Get Used To It,” Diana Gabaldon penned down her third script for the series. Despite her continuous engagement with the production crew, she admitted that her initial script underwent modifications.

In the adaptation, certain sequences featuring William, Jane, and their scenes were trimmed down, while there was an extension in the screen time for Hal and Lord John. Additionally, the narrative involving Brianna and Rob Cameron underwent some abbreviation. Author Diana Gabaldon offered another instance of book-to-show alterations during Season 7.

As a literature enthusiast with years of reading various genres under my belt, I find that dialogue is one of the most powerful tools an author can wield to bring their characters to life. In the exchange between Claire and Jamie from Outlander, for instance, their words convey not only their immediate reactions but also offer insights into their personalities, motivations, and relationships.

The original dialogue, with its colloquial phrasing and hints of Scottish dialect, is reminiscent of the oral storytelling tradition that has been a part of my own upbringing. It’s as if the characters are speaking directly to me, their words resonating with the rhythms and cadences of stories told around a fire or over a shared meal. The dialogue feels authentic and grounded in the time period and setting, which adds depth and realism to the narrative.

In contrast, the rephrased version seems to lose some of that magic. While it’s grammatically correct and easier to understand for a broader audience, it lacks the immediacy and intimacy of the original exchange. The colloquial language, dialect, and cultural nuances are missing, making the characters feel less like real people and more like caricatures or archetypes. This alteration dilutes the emotional impact of the scene and takes away from the overall richness of the story.

In my opinion, preserving the original dialogue is essential for maintaining the authenticity and immersive quality of a work of fiction. As a reader, I want to feel transported into the world of the story, and that can only happen when the characters’ words sound like they belong in their time and place.

In essence, both options are equally valid, but it’s about where you want to emphasize in a particular scene or narrative. In certain situations, one choice might be more suitable for a specific medium. For instance, I have plenty of space to explore various aspects at length; here, I can delve into Jamie’s doubts about managing a larger group of men than he ever has, under pressing circumstances. However, the show may not have the luxury of time due to space constraints. If they must select and prioritize elements from a book scene (which they often do), they usually opt for the shortest or most compact version.

In Diana Gabaldon’s novels, she strives to incorporate the authentic words of historical characters by drawing from preserved letters and diaries, thereby accurately portraying their unique personalities and speaking styles. For instance, her portrayal of Benedict Arnold in the books reflects his charm, philosophical leanings, and makes direct references to his actual historical actions.

She mentioned that scriptwriters for TV shows frequently abbreviate conversations due to time constraints, sometimes incorporating inaccurate or overly contemporary language. When such occurrences take place, she brings it to their attention, and approximately half the time, these alterations are corrected. Writing historical fiction, she further explained, necessitates a careful blend of established facts with imaginative interpretation, particularly when creating realistic dialogues.

When creating dialogue for a character based on a real individual (in the book), I strive to gather as much authentic dialogue as possible, particularly if they wrote letters or kept journals that have been preserved or cited. Additionally, I aim to grasp an understanding, however rudimentary, of what motivated that person and the unique way they spoke.

The scriptwriters often find themselves pressed for both time and resources, resulting in dialogues that are concise rather than elaborate. They generally perform well, but on occasion, they may introduce elements that, while fitting within their narrative context, are historically inaccurate or use contemporary phrases that wouldn’t suit the characters or settings. I bring these inconsistencies to their attention, and about half the time, they make the necessary adjustments.

A historical novelist frequently navigates a delicate balance, straddling the line between what’s known (though sometimes it remains elusive) and creative interpretation. Crafting dialogue is indeed an artistic endeavor, irrespective of the topic at hand.

Source

Read More

2025-01-01 12:15