Nvidia and the Cosmic Absurdity of Stock Splits

In the grand, incomprehensible theater of the stock market-a place where numbers behave as though they’ve been let loose by a mad mathematician with too much caffeine-there exists a company called Nvidia (NVDA). Nvidia, which now wears the crown of being the largest company by market cap in the world, has embarked on what can only be described as an interstellar journey for its share price. Even after encountering minor turbulence earlier this year (the kind that would make most companies clutch their spreadsheets like life rafts), its stock is still up about 32% year to date (as of Aug. 12). Over the past year, it’s climbed over 67%, and if you go back five years, well, let’s just say the number looks less like a percentage gain and more like the score from some particularly enthusiastic game of galactic bingo: roughly 1,479%.

Now, when stocks embark on such epic voyages-an odyssey through charts so steep they could give mountaineers vertigo-they often find themselves whispered about in hushed tones among contrarian investors and financial pundits alike. The question arises: will Nvidia perform another stock split? After all, it’s done so before, six times no less, including one as recently as 2024. But why, you might ask, do companies engage in these peculiar rituals? Let us explore this topic with the same level of seriousness one might apply to explaining why teapots whistle or why toast always lands butter-side down.

Why Would Companies Do Stock Splits?

A stock split is rather like deciding to cut your pizza into smaller slices because people keep complaining that the existing slices are too big to fit on their plates. It doesn’t change how much pizza there is; it merely changes how many pieces you have to juggle. In slightly less culinary terms, a forward stock split reduces the price per share while proportionally increasing the number of shares outstanding. This maneuver is typically employed by companies whose stock prices have ascended to dizzying heights, making them seem as unattainable as a unicorn riding a rainbow (which, incidentally, is probably trading at $1,200 per share).

Imagine, for instance, that you own 10 shares of a company valued at $40 each, giving you a total equity position of $400. If said company conducts a two-for-one stock split, you’ll suddenly possess 20 shares instead of 10-but each will now cost $20. Your $400 remains stubbornly intact, much like those socks that mysteriously vanish in the laundry yet somehow reappear months later without explanation. Meanwhile, the increased liquidity-the ability to buy and sell shares easily-is supposed to make everyone feel better, even though deep down we all know liquidity is just a fancy word for “how quickly you can panic-sell during a downturn.”

On the flip side, there’s the reverse stock split-a process so counterintuitive it might as well come with instructions written in ancient Sanskrit. A reverse split raises the stock price and decreases the number of shares outstanding. Why would anyone want to do this? Well, imagine you’re a struggling company whose stock has fallen below $1 per share, putting you at risk of being kicked off major exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or Nasdaq. Both require that stocks trade above $1 for 30 consecutive days. Rather than addressing the underlying issues (because who has time for that?), a reverse split artificially inflates the price, buying you enough time to either fix things or quietly slip away into obscurity.

Is Nvidia On Stock-Split Watch?

Nvidia, as previously mentioned, is no stranger to stock splits. Its history reads like the CV of someone who’s attended every prestigious space academy in the galaxy, except instead of rocket science, it’s mastered the art of splitting stocks. Previous splits occurred when the share price reached stratospheric levels, such as $740 in 2021 and $1,200 last year. Each time, the stock proceeded to soar again, defying gravity with the same nonchalance as a cat lounging on a windowsill.

As of this writing, Nvidia trades at around $182 per share. Given its prominence in index funds and exchange-traded funds tracking the S&P 500, it’s arguably one of the most liquid stocks in existence. Liquidity, in this case, means something akin to standing in Times Square during rush hour-you’re surrounded by activity, but good luck finding a quiet moment to think. With a market cap of $4.45 trillion, Nvidia faces absolutely no danger of falling afoul of Nasdaq’s rules (unless, of course, the universe implodes, which seems statistically inevitable given how everything else is going).

Could Nvidia conduct another stock split someday? Certainly. Will it happen soon? Probably not. At its current size, Nvidia resembles a blue whale trying to navigate a kiddie pool-it simply requires more room to maneuver. And besides, contrarian investors like myself tend to view such events with healthy skepticism. Sure, stock splits may create the illusion of accessibility, but they don’t alter the fundamental value of the company. They’re more like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic-not necessarily harmful, but also unlikely to save you from an iceberg.

(Though, speaking of icebergs, if anyone ever figures out how to monetize melting glaciers, I suspect Nvidia will lead the charge.) 🐳

2025-08-17 11:29

Why Would Companies Do Stock Splits?

Is Nvidia On Stock-Split Watch?

Read More