NuScale: A Reactor’s Hope and a Shareholder’s Prayer

by

NuScale Power, one gathers, is attempting to revolutionize the generation of electricity. The notion – and it is, admittedly, rather bold – is to construct miniature nuclear reactors, essentially power stations scaled down for the convenience of remote locations. These units, it is claimed, can be mass-produced, a prospect which suggests an assembly line of atomic fission, and deployed with a flexibility that larger, more established facilities conspicuously lack. One pictures them, perhaps, powering particularly demanding data centres, or discreetly illuminating the estates of those with a decided aversion to the national grid.

Should NuScale succeed – a considerable ‘if’, naturally – it might herald an age of ubiquitous nuclear power, safely supplying cities with energy devoid of those tiresome greenhouse gases. The current market capitalization, a mere $6 billion, would then appear, one suspects, rather quaint. And a fortunate investor, possessing the foresight to acquire shares at the present moment, might find himself in a position of enviable, if not immoderate, wealth.

However, the reality, as is so often the case, is somewhat less idyllic. The chasm between aspiration and achievement is, in this instance, particularly pronounced, which explains, perhaps, why the stock currently trades at a substantial discount to its recent peak. The question, therefore, is whether NuScale can genuinely bridge that gap. Let us examine the matter with a degree of detached, if not entirely optimistic, scrutiny.

A Promising Concept, Beset by Obstacles

NuScale’s future, it seems, hinges on three rather crucial points. First, it must convert the current murmur of interest into actual, binding orders. Second, it must successfully deliver its inaugural project. And third, it must demonstrate that its technology can compete with the increasingly prevalent alternatives. The first requirement, one notes with a certain amount of concern, is proving particularly elusive. NuScale remains, thus far, the sole American company to secure NRC approval for a small modular reactor – a distinct advantage, certainly – but this has not, as yet, translated into a corresponding surge in business.

No SMR has yet been deployed by NuScale for commercial purposes. There are projects in the works, of course. An agreement with Romanian partners promises a plant in Romania, and a collaboration with ENTRA1 Energy and the Tennessee Valley Authority suggests a potential deployment across seven states. Should these ventures come to fruition, it would be a truly remarkable achievement. But, as yet, they remain firmly in the realm of hopeful speculation.

The reluctance of potential clients to commit may stem, in part, from anxieties surrounding construction costs. This, indeed, was the principal reason for the cancellation of the Carbon Free Power Project in late 2023. The initial projections, one gathers, proved unduly optimistic, with inflation and rising interest rates rendering the price of power less competitive than that offered by the more conventional, if less glamorous, options of solar and wind. A familiar tale, alas.

Loading widget...

One is inclined to believe, however, that NuScale may yet succeed in marketing its SMR technology. The potential for scalability is undeniably present. But it will not happen overnight, and investors should brace themselves for a series of inevitable setbacks and disappointments. Could NuScale, therefore, ‘set you up for life’?

Perhaps, over the course of a decade or so, it might substantially enhance the value of one’s portfolio. But potential investors should understand precisely what they are acquiring: a company with a promising idea, but lacking a demonstrable track record. It is, in essence, a high-risk, high-reward proposition. It might, conceivably, secure one’s financial future. Or it might simply fade into the background, another cautionary tale in the annals of technological ambition.

Read More

2026-02-02 22:12