Norway’s Wealth Fund to Probe Crypto and Gambling Firms for Money Laundering Risks in 2025

by

As a seasoned analyst with extensive experience in global financial markets and a keen eye for ethical investment practices, I find myself intrigued by the approach of the Norwegian Government Pension Fund. The fund’s commitment to maintaining high ethical standards, particularly in sectors like cryptocurrency and gambling, is commendable. However, it’s important to note that while these industries may have their share of challenges, they also offer immense potential for innovation and economic growth.

The massive Government Pension Fund of Norway, worth about $1.8 trillion, holds around 1.5% stakes in approximately 8,700 companies worldwide that are publicly traded. Guided by ethical principles set forth by the Norwegian parliament, the fund’s Ethics Council ensures all investments adhere to strict ethical guidelines.

In a report presented to the Finance Ministry on October 10th, 2020, the Ethics Council expressed their plans to conduct a detailed examination of companies dealing with cryptocurrencies and gambling/casinos, particularly focusing on potential money laundering issues, by the year 2025.

This investment fund boasts substantial holdings in prominent crypto and gaming corporations. For instance, it possesses a 0.83% share in Coinbase Global Inc., a notable cryptocurrency exchange appraised at approximately $453 million. Moreover, it has diversified its portfolio with investments in gaming companies like Flutter Entertainment Plc, owning a 2.13% stake valued around $691 million, and MGM Resorts International, holding roughly 0.87%, worth around $121 million.

Industries such as cryptocurrency and gambling are frequently subjected to close examination because they have a high likelihood of being used in money laundering schemes. The immense amounts of cash and digital assets moving within these areas, combined with the decentralized structure of cryptocurrencies, make them appealing for illegal financial transactions.

Worldwide, regulatory entities have flagged certain sectors as having a high likelihood for money laundering activities. Notably, countries such as Australia and Malta have underscored that digital currencies (cryptocurrencies) and gaming platforms like gambling are frequently employed by wrongdoers to clean their ill-gotten gains. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime has echoed these worries, especially in Southeast Asia, focusing on the part online gambling websites and crypto exchanges play in enabling illegal financial transactions.

Jeremy Douglas, the Regional Representative for Southeast Asia and the Pacific at the UNODC, noted that the surge of unchecked online betting sites and digital currency platforms has substantially altered the terrain of money laundering activities.

As an analyst, I’ve observed a significant trend in Norway when it comes to cryptocurrency adoption. Data from Ernst & Young reveals that approximately 14% of Norwegian men have invested in crypto assets. This places Norway among the most crypto-friendly countries, alongside Germany and France, as analyzed by Coincub. However, Norwegian regulators have voiced apprehensions regarding the environmental footprint of cryptocurrency mining and its alignment with the nation’s sustainability objectives.

The Ethics Council is responsible for examining businesses where the investment funds are placed, to verify they adhere to ethical principles covering areas like human rights, environmental preservation, anti-corruption practices, and more. If a business fails to meet these ethical standards, the council may suggest that the funds withdraw their investments or publicly list such companies as a warning.

At present, this particular investment fund omits 189 businesses from its portfolio due to ethical considerations. Among these are notable companies such as Airbus SE and Boeing Co., which have ties to the manufacturing of nuclear weapons, and Glencore Plc and RWE AG, which engage in coal-related activities.

The council intends to scrutinize labor conditions at various shoe factories in 2025, without naming any particular companies. Notably, the fund owns shares in major footwear brands like Nike Inc., Adidas AG, and Puma SE. Historically, the footwear industry has faced concerns such as extended work hours, low pay, and limitations on workers’ ability to organize unions.

As an analyst, I’ve been tracking the commitments made by sportswear giants like Adidas and Puma towards ensuring fair and safe working conditions in their supply chains. Over the past 25 years, Adidas has taken numerous steps to uphold these standards, such as conducting comprehensive factory audits to check compliance. On the other hand, Puma requires all suppliers to abide by a legally binding code of conduct and takes an active role in investigating any reported breaches.

The Ethics Council presents their suggestions to the central bank’s governing body, responsible for managing the fund. Although the bank frequently follows the council’s guidance by excluding certain companies, it also has the option to interact directly with businesses or issue cautions aimed at modifying their conduct.

Companies slated for divestment are not publicly named until the fund has completed the sale of its shares to prevent market disruptions. The duration of the divestment process can vary from weeks to months, depending on the size of the holdings.

Read More

2024-12-04 14:34