Microsoft’s Risky Dance with Bitcoin – Why They Shouldn’t Ignore Big Daddy BTC

by

As Troy Miller, a seasoned investor and tech aficionado, I can’t help but feel a sense of deja vu as I witness Microsoft grappling with the Bitcoin conundrum. Remember Netscape? Microsoft let it slip through their fingers, and look where they are now – still playing catch-up in the browser market.

Hello there! I’m Troy Miller, and in the swift world of technology and finance, refusing to peer into the future could mean getting left behind. Microsoft is once again faced with a dynamic situation that it has encountered before – and this time, it’s due to Bitcoin.

The tech giant, Microsoft, is set to deliberate on whether to consider Bitcoin as a potential investment opportunity. This decision arises from a proposal put forth by the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR). The implications could be significant. If Microsoft overlooks Bitcoin and its value skyrockets, the company might find itself in legal trouble due to shareholders who claim it neglected its responsibility (fiduciary duty) to optimize returns.

Stakes Is High

Let’s dive into the core of this issue: Microsoft’s fiduciary duty. Companies are legally obligated to do what’s best for shareholders. Make money. That’s why Joe Rogan likes to describe companies as psychopaths. I digress. 

From an ethical standpoint, it’s crucial for them to explore all potential asset classes that could yield value. For those who observe the long-term trends and institutional backing of Bitcoin, this digital currency appears less like a speculative “possibility” and more like something they might be missing out on significantly if dismissed altogether.

Ethan Peck, the deputy director of NCPPR’s Free Enterprise Project, articulated this succinctly when he spoke to CoinTelegraph. He cautioned that if Microsoft chooses not to invest in Bitcoin and its value significantly increases, shareholders might potentially have grounds for a claim. In essence, Microsoft could find itself in a “should have, would have, could have” legal predicament if Bitcoin repeats the substantial growth experienced by investors in recent times.

In a recent statement to CoinTelegraph, Peck expressed that if Microsoft were to declare (presumably influenced by questionable and biased opinions) that it’s not beneficial for shareholders to invest in Bitcoin, and then the value of Bitcoin were to increase as expected, shareholders might have reason to take legal action against the company.

MicroStrategy Smoked Microsoft by over 300% 

Indeed, Microsoft’s board has suggested that shareholders should vote against the proposal because they are already monitoring a broad array of investable assets. However, does their stance make sense? Absolutely, Microsoft may be observing these assets, but why stand idly by while other companies capitalize on opportunities if they choose to remain on the sidelines? Consider MicroStrategy as an example. By adopting a bold Bitcoin investment approach, this business intelligence firm has outperformed Microsoft by more than 300% this year. It’s important to note that despite having fewer resources, personnel, and market influence compared to Microsoft, MicroStrategy has still managed to achieve significant success.

In simpler terms, it’s not surprising that Microsoft is hesitant due to their risk management strategies, but the growing acceptance of Bitcoin makes their reluctance seem outdated. The emergence of spot Bitcoin ETFs and increased institutional involvement in cryptocurrencies suggests that Microsoft might find themselves lagging behind if they continue to view Bitcoin as just a speculative asset. This perspective feels outdated in 2024.

The current value of Bitcoin, approximately $67,000, has dipped slightly from its recent high, but overall, it’s been on an upward trajectory. Despite its volatility, Bitcoin’s past performance suggests it could be a unique and potentially beneficial addition to a diverse investment portfolio. If Microsoft dismisses Bitcoin as a mere trend or novelty, they might misunderstand its potential function – not just as a protection against inflation, but as a groundbreaking form of value storage that an increasing number of Fortune 500 companies and asset managers are incorporating into their financial systems. To provide them with evidence, here’s a chart below; I’ll wait for your response.

Though the proposal might not succeed, as Peck pointed out, the debate itself has sown the ground for future shareholder interaction. This vote, slated for December, may not prompt an instant change of mind from Microsoft’s board, but the dialogue is far from over. As more years pass and Bitcoin prices continue to surge, the voice of shareholders could become increasingly insistent. Microsoft needs to ponder if remaining passive is worth the potential risks in this fast-evolving tech environment. The last thing a giant like Microsoft would want is to appear lagging behind, missing out on what might be a transformative financial opportunity.

In essence, Microsoft may prefer to observe as others explore this innovative financial landscape. However, eventually, major tech companies must determine if they wish to pioneer this new financial territory or risk fading into obscurity for progressive investors who embrace change.

 

Read More

2024-11-05 19:46