Matt Reeves and Lauren LeFranc Discuss Oz and Vic’s Relationship and That Intense Finale

by

As a fan of Gotham and its intricate characters, I find the insights into Oswald Cobblepot’s (Penguin) backstory in HBO Max’s “The Batman” series absolutely captivating. The way his upbringing, his relationship with his mother, and even his physical disability shape him as a character is nothing short of masterful storytelling.

‘The Penguin’ has concluded, garnering much admiration from both critics and audiences alike. A significant portion of the acclaim is directed towards Colin Farrell’s exceptional portrayal of Oz Cobb, with his fellow actors also receiving high marks for their solid performances.’

In an unprecedented turnout, the final episode garnered 2.1 million viewers in the U.S., airing on HBO and Max. This set a new record for the show, marking a 50% increase from its initial broadcast. Warner Bros. Discovery did not disclose the viewership numbers for the premiere.

Among all moments in the finale, the interaction between Oz and Vic, a memorable scene that doesn’t require any prior knowledge (for those yet to watch), has emerged as the most impactful. This scene has significantly boosted the finale’s rating, making it one of the top-rated episodes on IMDb.

Currently, Matt Reeves and Lauren LeFrance delved deeper into discussions about the series finale and the dynamic between Oz and Vic.

Matt Reeves: In our film, Colin Farrell portrayed The Penguin, and it wasn’t merely about delving into the character of The Penguin – which we certainly did – but rather, this interpretation felt right. A significant aspect of this is the exceptional talent that Colin Farrell possesses. He’s truly remarkable, and I believe one of the areas where Lauren revised the scripts – effectively – was to grasp his inner turmoil, which encompasses some truly horrific actions he takes. However, Colin approaches these challenges with immense bravery.

He’s an exceptionally compassionate actor who truly embodies his roles. At times, when he portrays a villain, there are moments when it seems like he’s reveling in the character’s wickedness, making it clear to the audience that this is just a malevolent character we’re watching unfold.

Colin is ensuring you grasp the emotional origins of the situation, so we can recognize similar emotions in him, thereby acknowledging the potential evil within each of us. It’s a very human aspect, and I believe that’s what made the project exciting for us – collaborating with Colin in portraying this character, as well as the entire cast, but particularly Colin was crucial to the overall narrative for us.

Lauren LeFranc: Balancing the humanity of a character while infusing empathy, crucial for character development and depth, yet never forgetting that he’s not a good man but a complex individual, is challenging. It’s essential to avoid giving an impression of being able to control him or finding his choices satisfying. This was a key aspect in my work.

In my opinion, attaining power often involves a delicate equilibrium. What struck me is that those who reach such positions are typically trusted by others due to their charisma or ability to captivate. They have an alluring quality that makes them appealing to people. However, this magnetism can sometimes conceal shadows, and the full extent of these darker aspects may not yet be apparent.

It can sometimes lead to confusion, but from this ambiguity arises some of the larger-than-life personalities we find in our culture and society. For me, it was about maintaining an honest portrayal of Oz, ensuring I accurately reflected its unique character.

Reeves: You often search for a perspective to understand something, don’t you? And you aim to provide viewers with this viewpoint, which was crucial. That was an integral part of Lauren’s initial concept when she approached us, and she proposed the storyline of this unfortunate boy [Victor Aguilar] who happened to steal wheels from a Maserati at the wrong moment. The thought of “Poor kid!” sparked my enthusiasm.

It seems to me as if the storyline is subtly hinting that the director perceives the plot as a predetermined fate where the child will inevitably meet his demise because he’s about to be killed by the protagonist. This child has unfortunately walked into this situation at an inopportune time, and it appears as though his life is now in danger due to his unwitting involvement.

Exposing the peculiarity of a character and having Oz be introduced to someone who reacts with bewilderment, such as “Who is this person?”, serves as an effective entry point. I believe it’s incredibly beneficial to include such characters in movies that feature larger-than-life personalities, serving as a powerful storytelling tool. This innovative approach was the brainchild of Lauren.

As a gamer, I was intrigued by the idea of a mentor-mentee dynamic for the character, Oz. In the underworld, young men are often groomed into it, and I found myself pondering why a kid like Victor would be drawn to such a dangerous environment. From the get-go, their first encounter felt twisted yet endearing to me. When initially conceptualizing Victor and this idea, I remember thinking, “Why can’t Oz have a Robin? Batman does.

That is sort of where I started: that Oz himself would say that he is deserving of a mentee and to shepherd somebody in. I also thought about the power dynamic: it’s no accident that Oz has taken a kid like Victor under his wing because he likes being seen as powerful, and he knows that someone like Victor sees him as such. It’s more distorted – the idea of traditionally a villainous character bringing someone into his world is just sort of a different take in my mind than a Batman and Robin dynamic.

In the series, we meet another character, Oswald’s mom, who resides in Gotham’s suburbs. It’s evident from the start that Oswald holds his mother dear, yet she exhibits emotionally harmful behavior towards him. This suggests that Oswald may have turned to organized crime as a means to gain his mother’s approval and respect, by aspiring to become a crime boss. Can you provide insights about Oswald’s relationship with his mother and its potential influence on his storyline in this series as well as The Batman Part II?

Intriguingly, Oz and Francis share an unusual, tangled bond, sometimes hinting at Oedipal undertones. What captivated me was exploring the origins and influences shaping a man like Oz, delving deeper into his character. Introducing a character like Francis seemed fitting for this purpose, providing an insightful perspective. In the initial episode, we encounter her primarily through Oz’s viewpoint, gaining a unique understanding of her in this light.

As we grow to understand Oz better, it becomes easier for us to delve into the complexities of Francis’ character, setting aside our initial judgments about her actions towards Oz. By the end of the series, I hope you gain a richer perspective on who Francis is, her motivations behind treating Oz as she does, and what drives her own aspirations. The intrigue lies in this portrayal of a woman who, during her time, may not have received the recognition she deserved. Her intelligence and cunningness hint at potential accomplishments if given the chance, yet it remains to be seen whether that opportunity was ever truly within reach for her.

In our series, we reveal early on that Oz has lost his two other siblings, and the reason behind their deaths remains unknown, creating a mystery within the show. This tragic event seems to have significantly shaped Oz’s bond with Francis. My interpretation is that when you lose two out of three children, you might concentrate all your affection, aspirations, and hopes onto the surviving child. This situation can be either overwhelming or exhilarating, depending on the character of the remaining sibling. For Oz, I believe it’s a mix of both pressures and excitement.

Discussion Point: In the initial episode, it’s disclosed that Oswald sports an unusual right foot. This abnormality, in turn, accounts for his distinctive walk. Let’s delve into the specific nature of this foot impairment and explore how it might influence his self-perception. Furthermore, considering his portrayal as a self-made man, we can examine how he maintains his image as a powerful figure despite this physical condition.

In my opinion, I felt it crucial to depict his clubfoot in the initial episode as the film leaves one questioning why he limps. I aimed to clearly explain this reason and also convey the extent of pain he endures without openly discussing it.

In a unique scenario, this individual hasn’t undergone a specific surgical procedure that is commonly used for clubfoot, which might be due to his family’s financial constraints during his upbringing. His mother, who didn’t have the means to afford such an operation, made the difficult decision not to pursue it. Furthermore, she doesn’t perceive clubfoot as a disability or issue, but rather as a challenge that has helped shape him into a stronger person.

In my work, I’ve been mindful of the stereotypes common in comic books, especially those that portray characters who are different or marginalized, such as individuals with disabilities or visible scars on their faces. These characters are frequently typecast as villains, which is regrettable and part of our comic book legacy I wanted to challenge. For me, it was crucial to depict Oz not just as a physically damaged person but also one who carries psychological wounds.

The essential nature within him shapes his decisions, including the more challenging ones. It’s not due to his disability or physical appearance that defines these choices. While they do contribute to his personality, they are not the sole or primary factors. This has been a crucial aspect I’ve always emphasized.

Source

Read More

2024-11-17 11:45