Is Bitcoin the Next Big Thing? A Politician’s Bold Take on Currency!

by

In a delightful turn of affairs, former Brexit Minister Jacob Rees-Mogg recently took to the expansive world of YouTube to share his musings on the monetary matters of yore and present. He boldly warned that the Bank of England, in its unseemly haste to roll out new banknotes adorned with modern art rather than the familiar mugs of esteemed monarchs, might just rattle the lovely citizens’ belief in the pound. One could almost hear the collective gasp of accountants everywhere! 😱

Our dear Rees-Mogg ventured into the philosophical depths of cash, suggesting that faith in tangible money is less about the shiny bits of paper and more about the shared delusion that they are actually valuable—an intriguing premise that may cast doubt on the value of one’s morning toast if one were to dwell on it too long.

History Of Hard Money

Taking a jaunt through history, he unearthed the paper currency’s first appearance in 11th-century China—our poor ancestors perhaps not realizing the chaos they were sowing with those flimsy notes! Rees-Mogg was keen to point out that the good ol’ British pound had its head firmly in gold’s grasp from 1660 until 1914. Talk about a steady ship in stormy waters!

Alas, the arrival of unbacked paper ushered in a cavalcade of inflation, as he lamented that governments indulging in a bit of cash printing act as slick pickpockets, robbing the hardworking savers and bondholders of their hard-earned trust. A charming image indeed! 💸

The Illusion Of Value

In a rather theatrical display, Rees-Mogg waved about a modern coin right next to a silver shilling from Charles I’s intriguing reign. Ah, those were the days when coins held value due to their splendid metal content! Today, however, our poor base-metal trinkets are entirely at the mercy of public belief—a treacherous line to walk, dear readers! 🔍

“Believing paper money has inherent value is a dangerous illusion,” he declared, sounding alarmingly like the ghost of Honest Abe warning about tricksters. Could it be that those notes in our pockets are merely glorified Monopoly money? Who knew the game had turned so real!

Bitcoin And Gold Compared

With a flair that would make any stage actor blush, Rees-Mogg then drew a rather clever connection between gold’s illustrious history and Bitcoin’s rather trendy obsession with scarcity. Gold, he noted, can be mined at a leisurely pace of 1-2% a year, while Bitcoin, that cheeky fellow, is strictly limited to 21 million coins. One can’t help but applaud the scarcity as a sure-fire route to “real value.” 💰

As he remarked, this “scarcity” gives Bitcoin a leg up, especially when one considers the endless issuance of fiat currency, which is more like an all-you-can-eat buffet for governments! Who wouldn’t want to gorge on notes after the financial shenanigans of 2008? 🍽️

Psychology Of Design

But wait, there’s more! In a moment reminiscent of a well-placed farce, Rees-Mogg posited that how money looks and feels holds some weight—who would have thought? By dabbling with abstract art instead of our regal figures, the Bank may just chip away at the lovely trust that citizens hold dear. Oh dear, what a catastrophe that would be! 🎨

He didn’t mince words, warning that when trust collapses, so too does a currency—pointing fingers at the horrors experienced in Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe. A grave reminder that some things should never be trifled with.

Crypto Community Reaction

In the realm of social media, many crypto enthusiasts gave a resounding round of applause to Rees-Mogg for his acknowledgment of Bitcoin’s “hardness.” How delightful it was to see a mainstream voice joining the cacophony of digital advocates, arguing whether Bitcoin could indeed resist the gnashing jaws of inflation and central-bank meddling.

His words serve as a gentle reminder that the strength of money isn’t merely in its design but in the enchanting dance of day-to-day trust—fragile, shimmering, and perpetually on thin ice.

Read More

2025-07-24 14:14