Hunting Anomalies with AI: A Smarter Approach to Cybersecurity

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new framework leverages the power of generative AI and active learning to pinpoint threats, even with limited labeled data.

The ALADAEN framework enhances anomaly detection through a modular design-first preparing provenance events into feature vectors, then employing a dual autoencoder with attention and adversarial training to robustly model benign behavior and calculate anomaly scores, and finally leveraging active learning with GAN-augmented data to continuously refine the system and improve ranking even with limited labeled data.
The ALADAEN framework enhances anomaly detection through a modular design-first preparing provenance events into feature vectors, then employing a dual autoencoder with attention and adversarial training to robustly model benign behavior and calculate anomaly scores, and finally leveraging active learning with GAN-augmented data to continuously refine the system and improve ranking even with limited labeled data.

This review details ALADAEN, a novel system combining adversarial autoencoders, active learning, and generative adversarial networks for enhanced anomaly detection in provenance data.

Detecting subtle, long-term threats remains a critical challenge in cybersecurity, particularly given the scarcity of labeled data for training effective models. This paper introduces a novel framework, ‘Ranking-Enhanced Anomaly Detection Using Active Learning-Assisted Attention Adversarial Dual AutoEncoders’, designed to address this limitation by combining adversarial autoencoders with an active learning loop. The proposed ALADAEN framework demonstrably improves anomaly detection rates in imbalanced provenance datasets, minimizing labeling costs while enhancing model accuracy. Could this approach unlock more robust and efficient defenses against increasingly sophisticated Advanced Persistent Threats?

The Rising Tide of Sophisticated Cyber Threats

Conventional anomaly detection systems, designed to flag deviations from established baselines, are increasingly challenged by the nuanced and adaptive strategies of Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actors. These threat actors deliberately employ techniques that mimic legitimate network activity, blending malicious actions within normal operational patterns. Consequently, security systems generate a high volume of false positives – alerts triggered by benign behavior mistaken for attacks – which overwhelm security analysts and obscure genuine threats. This creates a critical challenge, as focusing on numerous false alarms diverts resources and increases the risk of missing a real breach. The sophistication of APTs necessitates a shift toward more intelligent detection methods capable of distinguishing between subtle anomalies and typical system behavior, moving beyond simple signature-based or statistical deviation approaches.

Modern security operations are increasingly challenged by a deluge of system data, stemming from diverse sources like network traffic, server logs, and endpoint activity. This exponential growth far surpasses the capacity of manual analysis, even with skilled security personnel. Consequently, critical security events are often obscured within the noise, creating significant blind spots where malicious activity can go undetected. The sheer volume necessitates automated solutions, but simply increasing the rate of data ingestion isn’t enough; systems must intelligently prioritize and correlate information to effectively highlight genuine threats and prevent alert fatigue. Without robust automation, organizations risk being overwhelmed, leaving them vulnerable to increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks that exploit these overlooked anomalies.

Modern cybersecurity demands a shift beyond simple anomaly detection; truly effective threat detection necessitates systems capable of understanding normal operational behavior within intricate network patterns. These systems must differentiate between benign fluctuations and malicious activity by establishing a baseline of ‘normal’ that accounts for the inherent complexity of modern IT infrastructure. Rather than flagging any deviation as a threat, advanced systems correlate data points, analyze contextual information, and employ machine learning to identify subtle anomalies – deviations that, while minor in isolation, collectively indicate potentially malicious intent. This approach minimizes false positives and allows security teams to focus on genuine threats hidden within the noise of daily operations, ultimately bolstering defenses against increasingly sophisticated attacks.

Anomaly detection algorithms exhibit varying performance, as measured by nDCG scores, across different operating systems, datasets, and two attack scenarios.
Anomaly detection algorithms exhibit varying performance, as measured by nDCG scores, across different operating systems, datasets, and two attack scenarios.

Intelligent Systems: Deep Learning for Anomaly Insights

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) excel at feature extraction from complex datasets due to their multi-layered architecture and non-linear activation functions. These networks automatically learn hierarchical representations of data, identifying intricate patterns that traditional methods might miss. The incorporation of Attention Mechanisms further enhances this capability by allowing the network to focus on the most relevant input features when making predictions. Specifically, attention weights are learned during training, assigning higher importance to features that contribute most significantly to the outcome, and enabling the DNN to prioritize information effectively. This selective focus improves both the accuracy and interpretability of the extracted features, particularly in time-series or sequential data where relationships between data points are critical.

Autoencoder networks are utilized for unsupervised learning to define the expected, normal behavior of a system. These networks function by compressing input data into a lower-dimensional “latent space” representation and then reconstructing it back to its original form. During training, the autoencoder learns to minimize the reconstruction error – the difference between the input and the reconstructed output – when presented with normal system data. This learned reconstruction represents a baseline model of typical operation. Anomalies are then detected when the reconstruction error for new data points exceeds a predefined threshold, indicating a deviation from the learned normal behavior. The threshold is typically determined through statistical analysis of reconstruction errors on a validation dataset.

Traditional anomaly detection systems often generate a high rate of false positives due to their reliance on static thresholds or simplified models of normal system behavior. Deep learning approaches, specifically those employing complex architectures like recurrent or convolutional neural networks, mitigate this issue by learning the nuanced, high-dimensional relationships within operational data. By accurately modeling these intricacies – including temporal dependencies, feature interactions, and subtle variations – the system can differentiate between legitimate deviations and true anomalies. This improved modeling capability results in a substantial reduction in false positive rates, minimizing unnecessary alerts and allowing operators to focus on genuine issues, ultimately improving system reliability and reducing operational costs. The learned representations are capable of generalizing to previously unseen, yet normal, operational states, further decreasing the likelihood of misclassification.

ALADAEN iteratively improves anomaly detection by constructing feature vectors from provenance graphs, training an autoencoder, actively learning from uncertain samples, augmenting data with a GAN, and retraining the model until the labeling budget is exhausted.
ALADAEN iteratively improves anomaly detection by constructing feature vectors from provenance graphs, training an autoencoder, actively learning from uncertain samples, augmenting data with a GAN, and retraining the model until the labeling budget is exhausted.

ALADAEN: Augmenting Data and Learning with Active Guidance

ALADAEN utilizes Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to mitigate the effects of limited training data. This is achieved by generating synthetic data samples that supplement the existing dataset, effectively increasing its size and diversity. The GAN architecture consists of a generator network which creates new samples, and a discriminator network which evaluates their authenticity compared to real data. Through adversarial training, the generator learns to produce increasingly realistic samples, improving the overall quality of the augmented dataset. This data augmentation process enhances model generalization by exposing the model to a wider range of potential inputs, thereby reducing overfitting and improving performance on unseen data.

ActiveLearning is a sampling strategy used in machine learning to reduce the number of labeled data points required to train an accurate model. Instead of randomly selecting data for labeling, ActiveLearning algorithms identify the data points that, when labeled, are expected to provide the greatest improvement to the model’s performance. This is typically achieved by quantifying the uncertainty of the model’s predictions or by identifying data points that represent significant disagreement among an ensemble of models. By strategically querying labels for only the most informative data, ActiveLearning minimizes the need for extensive manual annotation, thus maximizing learning efficiency and reducing the cost associated with data labeling, particularly in scenarios where obtaining labels is expensive or time-consuming.

ALADAEN leverages deep neural network architectures to achieve normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) scores reaching 1.0 across multiple datasets. This performance represents a significant improvement over baseline models, with gains exceeding 100% observed in certain evaluations. The system’s enhanced capability extends to the detection of subtle anomalies, suggesting improved efficacy in identifying advanced threats that might be missed by conventional methods. These results demonstrate ALADAEN’s ability to not only improve overall ranking performance but also to refine the identification of critical, nuanced data points.

ALADAEN's active learning consistently improves nDCG, often exceeding a 100% gain in challenging configurations like PX and PP views, demonstrating its ability to more than double performance compared to the baseline.
ALADAEN’s active learning consistently improves nDCG, often exceeding a 100% gain in challenging configurations like PX and PP views, demonstrating its ability to more than double performance compared to the baseline.

Beyond Detection: Transferring Knowledge and Adapting to Change

The ALADAEN framework distinguishes itself through a robust implementation of TransferLearning, a technique allowing the system to apply knowledge acquired from analyzing one cybersecurity system to enhance its performance on entirely different, previously unseen systems. This capability bypasses the typical requirement for extensive retraining with new datasets each time a new environment is introduced, significantly reducing both the time and resources needed for deployment and adaptation. By intelligently transferring learned patterns and threat signatures, ALADAEN demonstrates an ability to generalize beyond specific configurations, offering a scalable solution for organizations managing diverse and evolving digital infrastructures. This approach not only accelerates the detection of anomalies across multiple systems but also improves the overall resilience of the framework in the face of novel attacks, representing a substantial advancement in adaptive cybersecurity.

The ALADAEN framework incorporates ReinforcementLearning to proactively bolster its defenses against constantly shifting cyber threats. This dynamic adaptation moves beyond static rule-based systems by enabling the framework to learn from interactions within the digital environment and refine its anomaly detection strategies in real-time. Through a reward system, ALADAEN identifies effective responses to evolving attack patterns, continuously strengthening its resilience without explicit reprogramming. This process allows the system to not only recognize known threats but also to anticipate and mitigate novel attacks, ensuring a more robust and future-proof security posture as the threat landscape changes.

The ALADAEN framework distinguishes itself through the strategic incorporation of ProvenanceData, which significantly refines anomaly explanations and bolsters user trust in its findings. By meticulously tracking the origins and transformations of data, the system doesn’t simply flag unusual activity; it articulates why an event is considered anomalous, providing a clear audit trail for security analysts. This enhanced explainability directly translates to more effective incident response, allowing teams to rapidly assess the scope and impact of potential threats. Crucially, this detailed analysis is achieved with an inference time of 12.1 ± 1.9 minutes, demonstrating performance comparable to, and in some cases exceeding, existing state-of-the-art anomaly detection systems, without sacrificing the crucial element of transparent reasoning.

The ALADAEN framework consistently improved information retrieval performance on the Linux PA dataset, as demonstrated by increasing and stabilizing normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) scores throughout active learning iterations.
The ALADAEN framework consistently improved information retrieval performance on the Linux PA dataset, as demonstrated by increasing and stabilizing normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) scores throughout active learning iterations.

The pursuit of robust anomaly detection, as detailed in this framework, benefits greatly from a dedication to parsimony. ALADAEN’s integration of active learning and adversarial autoencoders seeks efficiency-reducing the need for extensive labeled data while maintaining accuracy. This aligns with a fundamental principle: complexity obscures, simplicity reveals. As Alan Turing observed, “Sometimes people who are unhappy tend to look at the world as hostile towards them. A happy person believes the world is friendly.” The system’s architecture, striving to distill essential features from provenance data, exemplifies a similar intent – removing unnecessary layers to expose the underlying signal and, consequently, enhance detection capabilities. It’s not about adding more components, but about refining what already exists, a testament to the power of focused design.

The Road Ahead

The pursuit of anomaly detection, particularly within the fraught landscape of cybersecurity, often resembles chasing shadows. This work, by layering active learning upon an adversarial autoencoder architecture, offers a refinement, not a resolution. The efficacy, predictably, hinges on the quality of provenance data-a dependence rarely acknowledged with sufficient gravity. The system functions, but the fundamental question of what constitutes ‘normal’ remains stubbornly, beautifully, complex. Simplification, in this domain, is not merely desirable; it is a moral imperative.

Future iterations should resist the temptation towards algorithmic baroque. The current approach, while demonstrably effective, introduces multiple layers of abstraction. Each layer is a potential source of opacity, a vector for unforeseen failure. The goal should not be increased sophistication, but radical clarity. The code, ideally, should be as self-evident as gravity; the intuition, the best compiler.

A pertinent, though unglamorous, direction lies in exploring the limits of this approach with deliberately incomplete provenance. Real-world data is rarely pristine. A system that falters gracefully-that signals its uncertainty rather than confidently asserting falsehoods-will ultimately prove more valuable than one that achieves near-perfect accuracy on curated datasets. Perfection is not the destination; elegant failure is.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.20480.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-11-26 18:46