How a16z Thinks the US Crypto Bill is a Bit of a Cosmic Mess 🌌💰

by

In a universe where blurring lines between securities and commodities is as easy as finding a towel, a16z, the venture firm with more stars in its eyes than the Milky Way, argued that the current draft of the US Crypto Bill is like trying to catch a Vogon Constructor Fleet with a fishing net. It’s just not going to work, and it might even create gaps that benefit insiders while weakening retail safeguards. 😱

a16z instead favors the “digital commodity” model outlined in the earlier CLARITY Act, which is like the Galactic Encyclopedia of crypto laws. They propose pairing this with clear rules for when tokens can be considered decentralized, because who doesn’t love a good, clear rule? 📜

The firm also urged lawmakers not to tamper with the Howey test—the decades-old legal standard for defining securities—because rewriting it would be like trying to rewrite the Fundamental Rules of Galactic Engagement. It’s just not done. Instead, they suggest adapting it to evaluate whether any single entity still exerts control over a blockchain network, because in the end, it’s all about who’s holding the power. 💪

Beyond definitions, the letter raised a broader concern: that treating core blockchain functions such as mining, staking, or running consensus as financial activities could choke innovation faster than a Krikkit robot on a bad day. These functions, a16z argued, should be seen as infrastructure, not regulated services. After all, you don’t regulate the air you breathe, do you? 🌬️

At the heart of its argument, the firm cautioned that poorly drawn rules could open loopholes for insider sales and erode investor trust. The message to lawmakers was clear—tighten protections, don’t water them down. Because in the grand scheme of things, trust is the only thing that keeps the universe from collapsing into a singularity of chaos. 🌀

Read More

2025-08-02 08:37