‘Harming The Entire Family’: Brad Pitt Source Blasts Angelina Jolie’s ‘Never-Ending Attacks’ In Winery Dispute

As a seasoned lifestyle expert with years of experience navigating high-profile celebrity conflicts, I must say that this ongoing saga between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie is nothing short of a rollercoaster ride. The escalating legal battle over their former French winery, Château Miraval, has become the epitome of a bitter feud that transcends the realm of simple business disputes.


As a lifestyle aficionado, I’m following the unfolding saga of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie regarding their shared French vineyard, Château Miraval. Since February 2022, this once-shared estate has become the center of a heated legal dispute between our attorneys. The latest development comes from Angelina’s recent court filing, which, according to a source close to Brad as reported by PEOPLE, has sparked strong reactions.

As a devoted admirer, I can’t help but share the latest update on the situation between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. Recent court filings reveal that Jolie’s lawyers have accused Pitt of an underhanded move – trying to manipulate a revised confidentiality agreement (NDA) to muffle her voice regarding accusations of abuse and concealment incidents.

The submission additionally requests that Pitt reveals private correspondence, as Jolie’s lawyers argue that his actions are an attempt to conceal her perspective in the ongoing events.

As a lifestyle advisor, I can tell you that I’ve been privy to Brad Pitt’s inner circle and their response to these allegations was firm. They described it as a straightforward business disagreement, but regrettably, they view this court action as another instance of a personal attack, which unfortunately affects the entire family.

In simpler terms, the source suggested that Jolie’s proposal was overly broad and invasive, possibly to divert attention away from the fact that she sought a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) concerning their divorce proceedings.

In simpler terms, Brad Pitt’s legal representatives have countered Jolie’s motion by suggesting it is a tactic used to shift focus away from the truth. The source added that the allegation is that Jolie was the one who sought a confidentiality agreement regarding their divorce, not Brad.

According to Pitt’s lawyers, Jolie violated the agreed terms when she sold her share of Chateau Miraval to Tenute del Mondo, potentially denying their shared children their rightful inheritance.

Initially, Pitt filed a lawsuit against Jolie in 2022, asserting that her sale of the winery share contravened their prior understanding, under which they both needed to agree before such deals took place. The ongoing legal dispute between them is an extension of their longstanding disagreements, encompassing disputes over parental responsibilities for their six kids.

As someone who has worked as a family lawyer for over two decades, I strongly believe that the insistence by Brad Pitt on an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) to conceal his alleged criminal conduct is unconscionable. In my years of practice, I have seen numerous cases where parties attempt to use NDAs to cover up their wrongdoings, particularly in high-profile celebrity divorces. However, the use of an NDA in such a manner goes against the very essence of the legal system, which is based on truth and transparency. It’s my professional opinion that the court should not allow Pitt to use an NDA as a tool for hiding his alleged criminal conduct, as this would only serve to further erode public trust in the legal system. Instead, the court should encourage both parties to come clean and work towards a fair resolution, based on the facts of the case and the best interests of all parties involved.

As a survivor who values truth and transparency, I firmly believe that no one who has endured abuse should ever be compelled or pushed into silence. It’s essential for everyone to have the freedom to speak out about their experiences without fear or pressure.

Jolie’s lawyers argue that Pitt’s lawsuit and subsequent moves are meant as punishment and revenge. They believe he is trying to make Jolie keep quiet by enforcing the confidentiality agreements, instead of seeking justice.

On July 15, Pitt’s legal team argued against Jolie’s motion regarding her ex-husband’s private correspondence. They stated that Jolio was attempting to access communications related to confidential matters such as therapy sessions he underwent post the 2016 family flight, which eventually led to their divorce.

Read More

2024-08-06 11:54