Hackers Torch $90M in Nobitex Crypto For Political Drama—With Addresses That Roast IRGC

by
  • Nobitex watched $90M vanish, with hackers spelling political threats instead of loading their own wallets. 
  • Guess what? The attackers set money on fire—all to flex their ideology. 
  • Crypto addresses doubled as anti-IRGC graffiti. The blockchain as a message board, who knew?

On June 18, 2025, the Iranian crypto playground’s biggest kid, Nobitex, suffered a hack that left it lighter by $90 million. The culprits, identifiable by their peculiar taste for dramatic flair, didn’t settle for traditional larceny. No, no—they married geeky code and political grandstanding, sprinkling their loot among custom crypto addresses screaming, not for cash, but for revolution. This was less Oceans Eleven, more Dostoevskian political theater: the sort where the stolen gold gets flung into the sea just to watch emperors fume.

What Are Vanity Addresses? The Crypto Hipster’s License Plate 🚗

Vanity addresses—a phrase that’s probably more fun at parties than it is in bank accounts—refer to crypto wallet addresses with custom, user-picked sequences. Imagine if you could ask your bank to hand you a checking account number reading 1HATEBILLS. That’s the vibe. Of course, generating these addresses is about as easy as memorizing a phone book, burning up CPU cycles like it’s a 1999 LAN party.

So why do it? Some want bragging rights; others get to tell the world—every time they send or receive coin—that they really, really love (or hate) something. The catch: one slip and it’s less “statement” and more “cautionary tale.” Hackers, on the other hand, use them to turn the blockchain into their political pamphlet. Marx would have approved, if only he’d liked math.

Nobitex Hack: Move Over Anonymous, Here Comes Gonjeshke Darande

These hackers went on a smash-and-burn through Nobitex’s dear hot wallets across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, Ripple, Solana, Tron, and Toncoin—yes, all of them, because why discriminate? Instead of stashing the digital loot in some offshore ledger, they deposited it into addresses with names like 1FuckiRGCTerroristsNoBiTEXXXaAovLX (Bitcoin) and TKFuckiRGCTerroristsNoBiTEXy2r7mNX (Tron). The KGB would have blushed.

In a move that would have made Bulgakov’s Woland cackle, they didn’t even try to hide—they broadcast their message in 34 scary alphanumeric characters for the world to see, and then proceeded to “burn” the funds. That’s right: these pirates of cyberspace pillaged, only to throw the treasure chest into an active volcano. Call it principle or performance art—the effect was the same. Nobitex scrambled, cut off wallet access, and declared that customers’ savings, presumably resting in some very chilly cold storage, were safe. Cold comfort, perhaps, but still.

Enter Gonjeshke Darande, the pro-Israeli group whose name translates roughly to “Violent Sparrow,” and apparently, to “high drama.” Not satisfied with financial arson, they threatened to publish Nobitex’s source code, all while accusing the exchange of everything but bad poetry. Of course, this unfolded right as Israel and Iran traded everything but greeting cards in the region, so tension dialed only ever upwards.

Crypto Security: Still a Masquerade Ball, but With More Laser Beams 🔥

This little escapade illuminated, in garish neon, the precariousness of centralized exchanges perched in geopolitical minefields. Hot wallets—ripe for the plundering due to all that sweet internet connectivity—became both the talisman and Achilles’ heel of the operation. One wrong click, and voilà: $90 million, poof, down a rabbit hole with a political speech attached.

The whole saga draws new attention to Iran’s crypto lifeline. Since other countries politely refuse to lend a dollar, Nobitex and brethren help move billions to escape sanctions. The Central Bank, not wanting to miss the party, now limits exchange operating hours—to ensure, one presumes, that the hackers work only during office hours.

This was not your father’s hack. Rather than launder money in clandestine mixers, these cyber Don Quixotes harnessed the blockchain’s transparency, turning it into a glowing “open letter” to the IRGC. Forget the dark net—public chain, primetime, everyone invited. It’s cyberwar, but with better slogans.

Blockchain detective agencies (Chainalysis, among others) followed the digital breadcrumbs, spotting the money’s hop from Tron to Ethereum like Hercule Poirot with a laptop. Centralized exchanges—especially those stationed in spicy zip codes—had better lock their doors (and, perhaps, their egos). In the year’s tally of crypto heists, CertiK puts this $90M drama right on top, adding another $2.1 billion in digital loot gone missing across 2025. Offline storage and strong access management? For some, that ship has sailed.

Read More

2025-06-19 22:15