Gold ETFs: A Spot of Bother and a Dash of Sense

by

Now, regarding the matter of investing in gold, one finds oneself presented with a rather agreeable conundrum. There are, you see, these Exchange Traded Funds – the iShares Gold Trust (IAU 2.57%) and the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD 2.66%) – both perfectly serviceable vehicles for acquiring a slice of the golden stuff without actually having to wrestle with ingots. The question, naturally, is which one to favour? It’s a bit like choosing between two perfectly good pairs of spats – a decision that requires a modicum of careful consideration, what?

Both of these funds, you understand, are constructed to mimic the price of gold bullion itself. For the investor who wishes to dabble in precious metals without the bother of a safe deposit box and a burly guard, they offer a remarkably straightforward solution. However, a closer inspection reveals a few subtle differences, rather like discerning the cut of a diamond – only a keen eye will truly appreciate the nuance.

A Snapshot of the Situation

Metric IAU GLD
Issuer iShares SPDR
Expense Ratio 0.25% 0.40%
1-yr Return (as of 2026-02-04) 73.1% 72.9%
Beta 0.26 0.26
AUM $80.2 billion $173.3 billion

One observes immediately that IAU, being the more economical of the two, possesses a decidedly attractive expense ratio. GLD, while managing a rather substantial pile of assets (a veritable mountain of gold, if you will), demands a slightly heftier fee. It’s a trifling difference, perhaps, but in the world of finance, a penny saved is a penny that can be deployed for a spot of luncheon, wouldn’t you agree?

Performance and a Touch of Risk

Metric IAU GLD
Max Drawdown (five years) (20.93%) (21.03%)
Growth of $1,000 over five years $2,719 $2,700

As one can see, the performance is remarkably similar. A thousand pounds invested five years ago would have blossomed into approximately two thousand, seven hundred and nineteen pounds with IAU, and two thousand, seven hundred pounds with GLD. A negligible difference, really, and hardly enough to cause a flutter of concern amongst even the most fastidious investor. Both funds, it seems, are rather adept at preserving capital, which is, after all, the primary objective.

What’s Inside the Vault?

GLD, you see, is entirely invested in physical gold, a rather solid and reassuring proposition. It’s been around for over twenty-one years, a veritable institution in the world of precious metals. IAU, while equally devoted to the golden element, is classified under ‘real estate’ for reasons best known to the sector mapping conventions. A curious classification, perhaps, but in practice, it behaves precisely as one would expect – a direct proxy for the price of gold.

Neither fund, it should be noted, offers a yield. One doesn’t invest in gold for income, you see, but for preservation of capital and a hedge against the vagaries of the modern world. Both portfolios are entirely focused on gold bullion, making them functionally similar in terms of underlying exposure. A most sensible arrangement, wouldn’t you say?

For those seeking further guidance on the intricacies of ETF investing, a comprehensive guide awaits at this link.

The Bottom Line for the Discerning Investor

Admittedly, a superficial comparison reveals few material differences between these two funds. They both offer a similar performance over time, and both have been around for a reasonable spell. GLD, being the elder statesman, boasts a November 2004 inception date. However, IAU, arriving on the scene in January 2005, quickly established itself as a worthy competitor, courtesy of BlackRock’s iShares.

Loading widget...

The most significant difference, perhaps, lies in the expense ratio. GLD charges 0.40%, while IAU manages to undercut it with a mere 0.25%. A trifling sum, one might argue, but in the long run, it could amount to a rather pleasant little windfall.

Loading widget...

The other notable distinction is assets under management. GLD, with its $173.3 billion, is the clear leader. However, both funds possess a level of recognition and assets that should inspire confidence in even the most cautious investor. Therefore, one is inclined to favour IAU’s lower expense ratio when weighing the two options. A dash of prudence, you see, is always a good thing.

Read More

2026-02-06 04:33