Ethereum and Cardano Co-Founder: Trump the Favorite for Crypto, but the World Moves on Without the U.S.

As a researcher who has spent years studying the intricacies of blockchain technology and its applications, I find myself often observing the intersection of politics and cryptocurrencies with a mix of intrigue and skepticism.


At the TOKEN2049 conference in Singapore, Charles Hoskinson, co-founder of Ethereum and Cardano, discussed his views about the contrasting crypto positions of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in an interview with CNBC. During the conversation, Hoskinson offered a comprehensive comparison between these two political figures, emphasizing their standpoints on cryptocurrency matters.

To start off, Hoskinson expressed his view that Trump seems more favorable towards cryptocurrencies compared to other candidates. He elaborated that Trump’s direct and indirect connections to Decentralized Finance (DeFi) projects, plus his attendance at crypto-related events, suggest a supportive stance on the industry. On the other hand, Hoskinson noted that Kamala Harris and her political allies, such as Gary Gensler, have been associated with tougher regulations towards cryptocurrencies. In summary, Hoskinson believes that Trump is a better choice for those interested in cryptocurrencies due to Harris’s policies on crypto regulation that are often perceived as unfavorable.

Despite who occupies the presidency, Charles Hoskinson underlined that the worldwide shift towards accepting cryptocurrencies has already begun and gained momentum. He stated, “The globe, with or without the U.S., is adopting cryptocurrencies,” using Singapore, Hong Kong, and Abu Dhabi as examples of regions developing favorable environments for the industry. Moreover, he highlighted Switzerland’s FINMA and the UK’s FCA as institutions promoting crypto adoption. Hoskinson suggested that it would be beneficial for the U.S. to re-enter the global competition in cryptocurrency innovation, but acknowledged that a decentralized future for the world is imminent, whether or not the U.S. chooses to participate.

When asked about Trump’s actions that appeared opportunistic, given his family’s involvement in cryptocurrency, Hoskinson responded by pointing out that such behavior is often characteristic of politicians. He even used Nancy Pelosi’s trades as an example of political figures taking advantage of opportunities, saying “Every politician has some level of opportunism.” In Hoskinson’s opinion, this is a typical aspect of the American political system, something people have grown accustomed to.

Although Trump himself might have specific reasons, Hoskinson emphasized that the president doesn’t act independently when it comes to making decisions about cryptocurrency. The United States political system is complex and relies heavily on coalitions, meaning that even Trump’s stance doesn’t dictate the entire crypto policy-making process. Hoskinson highlighted a few Republican figures, such as Tim Scott and Senator Cynthia Lummis, who are supportive of fair regulation and dialogue regarding cryptocurrencies, which he finds promising. However, Hoskinson criticized the current Democratic leadership for being less receptive to engaging with the crypto industry. He specifically mentioned Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden as examples, stating that they haven’t shown much interest in discussing sensible regulations for cryptocurrency.

Despite some reservations, Hoskinson remains optimistic about the generational split within the Democratic Party. He believes that younger Democrats such as Ro Khanna are open to conversations about cryptocurrency regulations and could shape more equitable policies in time. Ultimately, he suggests that while older politicians might not be fully supportive of crypto at present, there will likely be a meeting of minds as fresh perspectives gain traction within the party.

Discussing Trump’s lasting impact on U.S. politics, Hoskinson remarked that although Trump is an unusual figure, his influence will eventually fade. Instead, he emphasizes the necessity of establishing fair and uncorrupted political structures in America, which promote a more equitable distribution of power. He argues that it’s crucial to avoid concentrating power within massive corporations worth trillions, proposing that decentralized systems could pave the way for a brighter future not only for America but also for the globe at large.

Read More

2024-09-23 22:44