Did Marilyn Manson Drop His Lawsuit Against Evan Rachel Woods? Find Out

As a long-time follower and advocate for justice, I can’t help but feel a sense of relief and vindication upon hearing the latest news regarding Marilyn Manson and Evan Rachel Wood. Having witnessed the heart-wrenching accounts of multiple women who bravely spoke out against him, it brings me great joy to see that one of his accusers, Ms. Wood, is finally being compensated for the legal costs she incurred during this long and arduous battle.


Regarding the recent developments in the Marilyn Manson and Evan Rachel Wood case, the musician has withdrawn his lawsuit alleging a conspiracy against him, which aimed to portray him as a serial abuser of numerous women.

Based on reports by The Hollywood Reporter, court records from earlier this month indicate that Woods is expected to be reimbursed around $327,000 for legal expenses incurred from Manson.

According to reports, it was claimed that the actress and her companion, Illma Gore, misled potential accusers into believing they had evidence of sexual assault allegations against Manson. They did this by suggesting that the musician had filmed a minor being assaulted in a 1996 short film titled “Groupie.

In 2021, prior to the release of the documentary “Phoenix Rising,” which discussed the sexual assault accusations against him and an actress’s endeavors to expand the statute of limitations for domestic violence cases in California, Manson filed a lawsuit against someone who had deceived him.

According to the report, Manson claimed that the pair coerced the accusers to make simultaneous allegations of rape and abuse against him, with the intention of boosting Wood’s career.

According to the report, the accusation stated that Gore reportedly convinced his accusers by claiming that the actress in Groupie was actually a minor during filming and had passed away. Furthermore, he suggested that if the video were made public, he himself would face charges.

2023 saw the court dismiss defamation accusations against Woods based on a law allowing for swift dismissal of cases stemming from protected speech. The court determined that Manson failed to prove Woods agreed with Gore’s supposed defamatory remarks or was aware that Gore intended to tarnish his reputation, as reported by the outlet.

According to the article from the publication, the musician attempted to resolve the lawsuit earlier this year by offering to cover some of Wood’s legal costs, provided that the terms of the settlement remained private and Wood agreed to issue a mutually acceptable public statement. However, Wood declined this offer, which eventually led Manson to withdraw the lawsuit.

Lawyer Howard King, representing Manson, declared that following a four-year-long legal struggle during which his client had an opportunity to “share the truth,” Manson decided to drop all remaining lawsuits and appeals to bring a conclusion to this specific phase in his life.

According to Wood’s attorney, Michael Kump, the case was essentially a publicity ploy aimed at discrediting the multiple accusers and reviving Wood’s struggling career.

Furthermore, as the lower court rightly determined, Warner’s arguments in this case were baseless. The fact that Warner ultimately withdrew his lawsuit and paid Ms. Wood the entire fee amount of approximately $327,000 serves to further validate this conclusion.

Read More

2024-11-27 07:53