Crypto Crackdown! Aussie Court Showdown! 🦘

by

Australia’s financial watchdog, like a persistent winter wind, seeks yet another audience with the High Court. This time, it’s over Block Earner, a fintech firm basking in the glow of a lower court’s favor. The question, like a half-remembered dream, is whether their crypto-linked, fixed-yield service is, or is not, a financial product. A riddle wrapped in a blockchain, perhaps? 🤔

ASIC, on this twenty-first day of May, declares its intent to petition the High Court. They seek, with the fervor of a poet seeking the perfect rhyme, to clarify the very essence of a “financial product.” To illuminate, like a lighthouse in a stormy sea, the circumstances under which interest-earning schemes and the transmutation of assets fall under the regulatory gaze. A noble quest, or a bureaucratic dance? 🤷

“The definition,” the watchdog proclaims, with the solemnity of a town crier, “was drafted broadly, with an eye to the future, technology-neutral. And ASIC, in its infinite wisdom, believes clarification serves the public good.” One wonders, does the public truly yearn for such clarity, or are they merely trying to survive another day? 😅

“This clarification, like a universal solvent, applies to all financial products and services, be they entangled with crypto-assets or not.”

On the twenty-second of April, Justices O’Callaghan, Abraham, and Button, like a trio of wise owls, decreed that Block Earner’s crypto-linked offering is neither a financial product, nor a managed investment scheme, nor a derivative, as defined by the Corporations Act. A victory, fleeting as a summer breeze? 💨

ASIC awaits the court’s consideration, a process as predictable as the changing seasons. Special leave is required, a rare flower blooming only when significant legal questions or matters of public interest demand it. The stakes, like a gambler’s last chips, are high. 🎲

A Block Earner spokesperson, with the measured tone of a seasoned diplomat, states that the matter has now ascended to a “broader legal question,” one that transcends Block Earner and the entire crypto sector. A ripple effect, perhaps, spreading across the digital pond? 🐸

“We believe,” the spokesperson continues, with unwavering conviction, “that the Full Federal Court’s April ruling was a robust and well-reasoned defense of our operations. We remain confident in its soundness and will respond through the appropriate legal channels.” A battle of wits, waged in the hallowed halls of justice. 🏛️

Legal saga ongoing since 2022

ASIC’s initial salvo against Block Earner was launched in November 2022, accusing the company of operating without the necessary financial services license. The yield product, available from March 17, 2022, until its demise on Nov. 16, 2022, became the focal point of contention. A brief, shining moment, extinguished by regulatory fire? 🔥

In February 2024, an Australian court initially ruled that Block Earner did, indeed, require a financial services license. A setback, like a stumble on a well-worn path? 🚶

However, a subsequent ruling in June 2024 absolved Block Earner of financial penalties, acknowledging their “honest” pursuit of legal opinions before launching the products. A glimmer of hope, amidst the legal storm? 🌈 ASIC, undeterred, appealed. The dance continues. 💃

Block Earner, not to be outdone, appealed the Federal Court’s decision on July 9, 2024. The legal pendulum swings, back and forth, in this endless quest for clarity. ⚖️

Read More

2025-05-22 03:53