Blake Lively Challenges Justin Baldoni’s “Receipts” with Subpoenas to Major Telecom Companies

Blake Lively is pursuing a court case to reveal the facts about the dispute surrounding It Ends With Us. As a reaction to Justin Baldoni’s allegations, she has issued subpoenas to significant mobile network providers and a prominent social media influencer to gather solid proof.

Legal representatives for Lively have served subpoenas on AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, and digital strategist Jed Wallace. The goal is to obtain documents that may shed light on a suspected defamation campaign against her. Lawyers Esra Hudson and Michael Gottlieb believe these records will identify the parties responsible for tarnishing Lively’s public image.

As a devoted admirer, I’d put it this way: Baldoni’s legal representative, Bryan Freedman, dismissed the action as a “fishing expedition,” labeling Lively’s demand for detailed call, text, and location records from a two-year span as unwarranted. He maintains that there is no factual basis for her assertions and believes she will not find any evidence to back them up.

At the heart of Lively’s accusations lies the assertion that Baldoni, along with Melissa Nathan-led PR team, coordinated a malicious online reputation attack. As claimed by Lively, Wallace was brought in to distort public opinion, deflecting focus from sexual harassment allegations against Baldoni. The messages between Baldoni’s team reportedly indicate they were conscious of and profited from this tactic.

In the meantime, Wallace filed a defamation lawsuit worth $7 million against Lively, making their ongoing legal dispute even more intricate. As the case progresses, both parties are modifying their complaints and issuing conflicting public statements about the allegations.

As a conscientious lifestyle advisor, I find myself closely following the ongoing legal saga that’s unfolding between Baldoni and Lively, along with Ryan Reynolds. The defamation case filed by Baldoni, valued at an impressive $400 million, is just one piece of this intricate puzzle. This conflict, far from reaching a resolution, remains a heated issue.

In the lead-up to the scheduled trial in March 2026, both parties are gearing up for a fierce confrontation. The pursuit of truth and justice continues to be the focal point as the intensity of this legal battle escalates.

Read More

2025-02-13 10:53