Bitcoin’s New Limit Sparks Chaos and Humor! 😅

In the dim-lit corridors of digital finance, where dreams and illusions collide like the stormy souls of Petersburg, the developers of Bitcoin—those quixotic dreamers—have announced a change so profound, so audacious that even Raskolnikov might raise an eyebrow. Version 30 of their sacred code, destined to come forth in October 2025, will inflate the OP_RETURN data limit from a modest 80 bytes to a staggering nearly 4 megabytes. Yes, you read that right, four megabytes! As if Bitcoin, that fragile onion of hope, needs more layers of nonsense and data to peel away.

This act—this gamble—marks a relentless advance in expanding Bitcoin’s capacity, a victory to some, a catastrophe to others. It is a triumph for the reformists, led perhaps by Antoine Poinsot, who believe that more data equals salvation. But beware—this is not merely technology; it is a mirror held up to the abyss, reflecting humanity’s eternal hunger for more even at the risk of collapsing into chaos.

Bitcoin Core 30 Expands OP_RETURN Limit, Igniting Community Backlash

Ah, OP_RETURN! The sacred instruction, once guarded jealously to prevent blockchain from drowning in the sea of foolishness. Now, that sacred guard is cast aside—an act of rebellion, like a madman shouting in the night—allowing massive storage of inscriptions, on-chain data, and digital graffiti all on the very backbone of Bitcoin. The supporters cheer, dreaming of Layer 2 wonders, decentralized identities, and Web3 utopias. But beneath the cheers lurk the murmurs of dissent, bitter as the bitterest vodka in Siberia.

On Twitter—oh, how the wise men and fools clash!—Jimmy Song, with his usual dry wit, warns that this will bring ruin, like pouring gasoline on a fire: “OP_RETURN outputs greater than 83 bytes will increase significantly, UTXO bloat will keep getting worse and there will be more garbage on chain. This is going to age like a bad tattoo.” A joke, perhaps, but not a funny one for those who see their precious chain turn into a landfill of digital detritus. 😜

“You ignore community consensus, you lose trust,” sighed the voice of reason—or perhaps despair. “Bitcoin Knots has surged from 2% to 11% of nodes. That’s what happens when the big boys ram their wishes down our throats.”

And then, the accusations! The sex scandal of development—sponsors pushing agendas, the core turning into a playground for the rich and powerful, abandoning its noble roots in favor of some shadowy enablers. Truly, the tale is as tragic as Dostoevsky’s best characters, fraught with greed, ideologies, and unseen manipulations.

Reformers Celebrate, Critics Warn of Doom: Welcome to the New Russia of Bitcoin

Since Peter Todd’s audacious April proposal, the ideological battle has heated, like the worst of Dostoevsky’s fever dreams. Todd, in his prophetic gloom, warns of centralization—the slow suffocation of what is left of true Bitcoin. He questions: Are we not sacrificing our noble ideals on the altar of short-term convenience? The answer, in this dark world, remains uncertain, like Raskolnikov’s redemption.

“The restrictions are easily bypassed by direct substitution and forks of Bitcoin Core,” he mutters from the shadows, a prophet of doom.

Supporters, those deluded optimists, dismiss fears of bloat and spam as mere paranoia. They argue that with clever fees and filters, Bitcoin can be both a fortress and a playground. Yet, lurking in the background is the fear—a specter—that this change will be used to tether Bitcoin to the whims of the powerful, to turn it into just another tool of control.

Just a day earlier, the same community howled over new relay policies, accusing the project of slipping away from its core principles—limiting access, favoring the well-connected. Yes, the noble dream of universal decentralization is slipping away, like the last train leaving the station.

And yet, amidst this chaos, Bitcoin Endures. The most used protocol, battered but unbroken, with new alternatives like Bitcoin Knots emerging—a testament to human stubbornness and despair. The purists sneer, seeing all this as a betrayal of the original vision, a descent into chaos and corruption.

Now, with version 30 looming—a turning point, a Faustian bargain—Bitcoin stands at the edge of an abyss, destined to either ascend into new light or plunge into darkness. The game is afoot, and fate waits eagerly to see which way the wind will blow. Perhaps, in another life, this was all foretold in some Dostoevskian novel—an endless struggle between faith and doubt, order and chaos, integrity and greed. 🎭

Read More

2025-06-10 13:25