Bitcoin’s Immortality: A Portfolio Satire of Halvings & Hubris

by

In every market cycle, there arrives a moment when investors, like starry-eyed pilgrims, convince themselves that the road ahead is paved with velvet. But the October 10 flash crash revealed a curious spectacle: Bitcoin (BTC), that most theatrical of assets, bent like a reed in a hurricane while lesser coins shattered like glass baubles at a Bolshevik’s ball.

This paradox anchors a grander debate: Could BTC’s reputation as a financial acrobat-forever flipping between euphoria and despair-be softening? One crypto baron recently declared the four-year halving crash cycle as obsolete as a Tsarist ruble. But let us not mistake a truce with gravity for immunity from it.

Loading widget...

The Credible Farce of Progress

Arthur Hayes, once the ringmaster of BitMEX’s circus, penned an essay on October 8 suggesting BTC’s volatility-a trait as reliable as a Soviet breadline-is fading. The halving’s specter, he argues, now dances to the tune of central bankers’ liquidity symphonies. These maestros, once austerity’s hounds, now pour fiat elixirs into the veins of markets, creating what Hayes calls “a champagne tide to float even Bitcoin’s leaky dinghy.”

There’s method to his madness. The Fed’s flirtation with 2% inflation is less a policy than a wistful daydream, leaving investors to speculate whether BTC might become the mattress-stuffing tool of choice for a new era. Add to this the rise of ETFs-a $93 billion piggy bank where institutions now tuck their digital doubloons-and one might imagine a floor beneath the freefall.

Yet October 10th’s chaos offered its own punchline. While altcoins crumbled like stale matzo, BTC lost a mere 7%, suggesting the emergence of a new aristocracy in crypto: coins propped up by silent buyers with deeper pockets than a Politburo safe. A reassuring sign? Perhaps. But as any seasoned gambler knows, even brass trinkets tarnish when the music stops.

The Halving’s Ghost and Other Tall Tales

The four-year halving cycle-once as predictable as a bureaucratic backlog-now faces the chaos of human greed. Hayes contends that expanding liquidity and institutional adoption have blurred the old boom-bust script. And yet, history whispers warnings through its teeth: Since 2014, BTC has endured drawdowns deeper than a Siberian mine shaft, with declines averaging 80% during winters of discontent.

Can structural demand from ETFs truly tame this beast? Possibly. But to declare victory over volatility is to forget that markets, like Soviet commissars, delight in punishing hubris. Even a maturing asset class may yet spring traps as cunning as Ostap Bender’s schemes.

So what’s a prudent speculator to do? Treat BTC as one would a volatile inheritance: hedge with a position size that survives a 50% haircut, and dollar-cost average like a peasant sowing seeds in uncertain soil. Expect fewer cataclysms, yes-but never forget: Black swans, like revolution, care little for your spreadsheets.

After all, in the grand tradition of get-rich-quick schemes and central bank theater, Bitcoin remains the ultimate picaresque adventure. 🪙

Read More

2025-10-16 13:55