BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE Proves Tim Burton and Michael Keaton Should Make Another BATMAN Movie

by

As a gamer with a soft spot for both Tim Burton and Michael Keaton, I wholeheartedly agree that it’s high time for a third Batman movie. I remember the excitement when the first two films came out, and the disappointment when they stopped at just two. It feels like unfinished business, like finding a game with an awesome story but no ending sequence.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice may not be a flawless film, but it’s undeniably an exhilarating watch. It serves as a comeback for Tim Burton, reviving some of his original creativity. This resurgence has sparked speculation about which franchises Burton might revisit next. The top pick among fans—and arguably the most fitting choice—is another project starring one of Burton’s previous Beetlejuice actors, namely Michael Keaton. In my opinion, it’s high time Warner Bros. Discovery collaborates with Tim Burton and Michael Keaton to produce a third and conclusive Batman movie together.

The blockbuster success of “Beetlejuice” shows that audiences, even after years of waiting, are eager to watch Michael Keaton in a Tim Burton movie. This was achieved with a property not as guaranteed for success as a new Batman film would be. Batman, not Superman, is DC Comics’ most invincible cinematic superhero. Whenever Warner Bros. produces a solo Batman movie, audiences flock to the theaters.

In a natural and easy-to-understand manner: Another Batman movie by Tim Burton wouldn’t create issues for James Gunn’s growing DCU, as it will have its own Bruce Wayne soon. Movies not part of the DCU, like “Joker: Folie à Deux,” are classified under a different “Elseworlds” label. Moreover, Burton’s dreamlike Gotham is distinct from Matt Reeves’ more realistic and gritty “Battinson” Elseworlds universe, so there’s space for both. Since Burton and Keaton might only make one last Batman film, there’s plenty of room for them too.

But ticket sales are a concern for the studio, not fans. Just as the multiverse and canon questions are something for James Gunn to worry about. The best reason Burton and Keaton should bring back their Dark Knight is the only one that actually matter: the movie itself.

Michael Keaton’s portrayal of Batman in Burton’s two “Batman” movies is unique, captivating, and outstanding in its own right. Burton crafted a stylish, distinctive universe that sets his live-action Batman adaptation apart from the rest. The Gotham depicted in these films is reminiscent of a comic book, filled with iconic characters brought to life. Critics often praise Keaton’s portrayal as the best Batman ever, despite being considered a contentious choice initially. Following his role in “Beetlejuice,” it appears that Keaton could slip back into the Batman suit effortlessly, as if he had never taken it off.

Despite never concluding their tale, the story in Batman Returns falls short of being satisfying overall. The ending sets a melancholic stage for future installments, yet many viewers remain unconvinced that George Clooney and Val Kilmer’s portrayals of Bruce Wayne continue the narrative as DC suggests. Joel Schumacher’s portrayal of Gotham City was significantly different from Tim Burton’s, a departure that has only grown more noticeable since Michael Keaton departed the franchise. The beloved and cherished version of Gotham that Burton created is now even more appreciated than it was at the time he left the series.

A prolonged wait for the third movie might unexpectedly turn out to be a great advantage. This could provide Burton and Keaton the opportunity to create something unique rather than continuing the same narrative. If they had made Batman 3 in the ’90s, it would have been another installment of the same story with Bruce Wayne tackling a new issue. However, after all these years, the Caped Crusader played by Keaton would be significantly older and changed in substantial ways.

What implications might that scenario hold for him? How did adversity reshape his character? Was he toughened by failure, or tenderized by loss? How would he have coped with aging and waning prowess? How would life experiences and accumulated wisdom transform him through the years? Did he prepare a successor to carry on as Gotham’s protector?

With numerous compelling tales about an aged Bruce Wayne, such as “Batman Beyond”, serving as potential inspiration, Tim Burton might find it intriguing to create a new story in this vein, much like he did with his initial two films. It’s enough just to consider this idea that DC should immediately give the go-ahead for this movie without even a script. Just visiting that version of Gotham again holds appeal. Similarly, seeing Michael Keaton reprising his role as Batman, not his counterpart from other universes, is enticing.

One last point to consider is why Beetlejuice Beetlejuice could pave the way for Batman 3. Tim Burton’s films, particularly his Batman installments, hold significant value in cinematic history. They are not just iconic superhero movies but movies in general that have made a lasting impact. Today, superheroes are everywhere on the big screen, and it’s safe to say that without Michael Keaton’s tenure as the Caped Crusader, they wouldn’t have achieved such widespread popularity. Few film franchises can boast a legacy like this, and even fewer deserve a sequel that continues their legacy.

Instead of expressing their discontent over McDonald’s toys, parents could have allowed Tim Burton to end his Gotham story as he intended without interference. This decision might not have caused Michael Keaton to abandon Wayne Manor either. They could have enjoyed the ultimate Batmobile ride, exactly as they desired.

After a long absence, Tim Burton and Michael Keaton ventured back into the realm of the afterlife. Upon their return, they rediscovered the enchanting cinematic charm. With this magic now at hand, it’s high time for them to work their wonders in Gotham City.

Read More

2024-09-13 19:33