qfx

Look, if people stop spending money, Visa’s numbers will go down. Groundbreaking analysis, I know. But here’s the thing: people aren’t suddenly going to revert to carrying around wads of cash. That’s just…uncivilized. And this whole e-commerce thing? It’s not going away. You can’t just un-invent online shopping. It’s a nightmare, with all the shipping delays and questionable product photos, but it’s here to stay. So, even if everyone’s a little tighter with their money, they still need groceries. They still need, I don’t know, whatever it is people buy. And they’ll use a card to pay for it. It’s just…convenient. And Visa benefits from that. It’s not a good system, but it’s the system we have. They also provide security. Which is nice. I suppose.

The SEC filing showed Alpine shedding the shares in the last quarter. The paper loss on the position clocked in at $13.83 million, a combination of selling and the stock deciding to take a long nap. A company losing money isn’t news. A company losing money and watching its stock price follow suit? That’s a pattern.

There’s a perfectly good war going on over in the Middle East, which, historically, isn’t exactly bad for gold. It’s one of those counterintuitive things. People tend to think of gold as a safe harbor when things look a bit dicey, and the attacks on Iran did indeed give the price a little boost – 2.6%, to be precise. Though, thinking about it, “safe harbor” seems a rather grand term for a shiny metal. Still, it’s a tradition.

There’s a tremor in the air, a sense that the branches may not bear such fruit again, at least not without a storm first. Valuations hang heavy, ripe to the point of overabundance. The question, then, is not merely whether to invest, but when. To chase the retreating tide, or to wait for the inevitable ebb?

In a 2008 commentary published in The New York Times, Buffett addressed investor anxieties amidst the unfolding financial crisis. The precipitous decline in equity valuations – the S&P 500 experienced a loss exceeding 50% between 2007 and 2009 – prompted widespread risk aversion. Buffett’s central thesis, then as now, underscores the importance of disciplined, long-term investing, independent of prevailing market sentiment.

The standard high-dividend ETF, you see, is a bit like a magpie’s nest – shiny objects gathered from various sources. It concentrates on companies that hand out a decent portion of their earnings, which is all very well, except those companies often reside in sectors that are, shall we say, ‘stable.’ Utilities, real estate…the places where excitement goes to retire. Diversification suffers, and you end up with a portfolio as thrilling as a beige carpet. A perfectly serviceable carpet, mind you, but hardly one to inspire poetry.