A Prudent Inquiry into Dividend Yields

by

The discerning investor, ever mindful of a steady income, finds herself presented with two vehicles for its attainment: the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEMKT:VYM) and the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHD). Both profess a dedication to those companies which regularly distribute a portion of their earnings, yet a closer examination reveals subtle distinctions that may prove decisive to a prudent allocation of funds.

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a portfolio in want of a reliable income must be in a constant search of suitable holdings. VYM, with its expansive net cast across nearly six hundred companies, appears to embrace a philosophy of widespread security, much like a sensible marriage arranged for the benefit of all concerned. SCHD, however, follows a more selective course, favouring a smaller number of concerns—a hundred and one, to be precise—screened for both quality and a generous yield. This comparison, therefore, touches upon matters of cost, performance, and the delicate balance between breadth and concentration.

A Concise Accounting

Metric VYM SCHD
Issuer Vanguard Schwab
Expense Ratio 0.06% 0.06%
1-yr Return (as of 2026-02-09) 20.77% 18.20%
Dividend Yield 2.33% 3.51%
Beta 0.78 0.71

VYM, while scarcely more economical, presents a slightly diminished cost, a matter which, though small, is never entirely negligible in the eyes of a careful manager. SCHD, on the other hand, appeals to those who place a premium upon immediate gratification, offering a dividend yield a full percentage point higher than its counterpart. One cannot but observe that a larger payout, while tempting, may not always be the most judicious course.

A Comparison of Fortunes

Metric VYM SCHD
Max Drawdown (5 y) (15.83%) (16.86%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,616 $1,409

SCHD exhibits a tendency toward concentration, with its holdings primarily situated within the energy, consumer defensive, and healthcare sectors. Its leading positions are occupied by names such as Lockheed Martin, Texas Instruments, and Chevron—companies of established reputation, though perhaps lacking in the diversity one might prefer. VYM, in contrast, distributes its affections more widely, with significant allocations to financial services, technology, and healthcare. One might surmise that such a broad diversification offers a degree of protection against unforeseen circumstances, though it may also result in a less spectacular return.

The discerning eye will note that SCHD, with its fewer holdings, appears to place its faith in a select group of performers. This is not necessarily a fault, but rather a statement of intent. VYM, by spreading its resources across a greater number of companies, embraces a more cautious approach—a strategy not unlike that of a lady who declines to place all her hopes upon a single suitor.

For further enlightenment on the subject of ETF investing, a comprehensive guide is available at this link.

The Implications for the Investor

The pursuit of dividends is not merely a matter of securing a regular income; it is a testament to confidence in the underlying businesses. It is a declaration that one expects these companies to continue prospering, even amidst the inevitable fluctuations of the market. The choice between VYM and SCHD, therefore, hinges upon one’s temperament and long-term objectives.

VYM, with its extensive holdings, provides a dividend stream supported by a multitude of sectors and business models. This offers a degree of resilience, but may also result in a more modest yield. SCHD, on the other hand, concentrates its resources upon a select group of companies, potentially lifting payouts but also increasing the risk of concentrated results. Ultimately, the decision rests upon whether one prioritizes stability and diversification, or a higher yield in exchange for a greater degree of concentration.

For the investor seeking a steady background income for a long-term portfolio, VYM may prove to be a suitable match. SCHD, however, appeals to those who desire a larger payout and are willing to accept a degree of concentration in exchange. The choice, therefore, is not merely a matter of financial calculation, but of personal preference and a clear understanding of one’s own risk tolerance.

Read More

2026-02-10 21:04