Decentralization: Just a Buzzword?

by

Crypto, huh? It’s like that one friend who always promises to change the world but ends up just changing their outfit 🤑. From Bitcoin‘s mysterious beginnings to Ethereum‘s “we’re gonna make governance cool” vibes, the whole decentralization thing has been a big deal. But, let’s be real, in 2025, it’s starting to feel like a performance rather than an actual transformation 🎭.

Those super cool web3 platforms everyone’s obsessed with? Yeah, they’re still pretty centralized 🤫. The teams behind “community-owned” protocols are like, “Hey, we’re all about sharing power… as long as we’re in charge” 🤣. Token voting systems are basically just a way for rich insiders to get richer 💸. And the communities, the ones who are supposed to be in charge? They’re just along for the ride 🚂.

It’s no wonder people are getting disillusioned with the whole crypto scene 😒. Has decentralization just become a fancy word for “we’re gonna pretend to care about the community”? 🤔

The Token Distribution Dilemma

One of the main reasons decentralization is a joke is because of token allocation 🤦‍♀️. Most blockchain projects start with a bunch of rich investors and founding teams getting the majority of the tokens 🤑. Then, when the token goes public, the community gets to buy in at a higher price and with way less governance power 🤯.

It’s like, imagine you’re part of a fan community that’s super passionate about a franchise, but the corporate executives are the ones calling the shots 📺. That’s basically what’s happening in crypto right now 🤦‍♀️.

Governance as Performance

Governance systems are supposed to be the embodiment of decentralization, but really, they’re just a show 🎭. Most crypto governance is still based on the “one token, one vote” model, which means those with more money get more say 💸. And, surprise surprise, the people with the most money are usually the early investors 🤑.

It’s like, the industry is pretending to care about decentralization, but really, they’re just keeping control tightly held 🔒. It’s like those old “choose your own adventure” games where you got to pick your character’s outfit, but not the actual story 📚.

The Cultural Cost of Centralized Web3

Communities are the heart of crypto, but when they realize they have no real agency, participation falters 💔. Builders stop contributing, advocates lose interest, and the energy that once animated a protocol dissipates 💀.

This isn’t just about idealism; there are real risks to centralized control in decentralized packaging 🚨. Projects lose resilience, innovation slows, and network effects weaken 📉. And, let’s be real, users start to trust less, not just in one project, but in the entire narrative of web3 🤥.

Can the Industry Redeem Its Own Narrative?

The truth is, the tools for genuine decentralization exist; they just require intentional design 🛠️. Token voting could be replaced with mechanisms like quadratic voting, delegated councils, or contributor-based reputation systems 🤝. Community treasuries could be structured to prioritize long-term contributors and creative experimenters, not just short-term returns 📈.

There’s already a broader cultural shift happening in corporations and beyond 🌎. People want meaningful participation, not just a seat at the table 🤝. Crypto has the potential to take that idea further, but it requires a fundamental shift: away from performance, toward shared power 💪.

The Path Forward

Crypto doesn’t need to abandon decentralization; it just needs to take it seriously 💯. That means recognizing where the current model fails, redesigning governance for inclusion and transparency, and reallocating power where it belongs: with the people building and believing in these networks every day 🌟.

If that shift happens, decentralization will no longer be a branding tool, and those conversations will no longer be necessary 💬. It will become what it was always meant to be: a shared structure of value, ownership, and creativity 🌈. If it doesn’t, the industry will find itself increasingly isolated, not just from regulators, but from the very communities it claims to empower 🚫.

Arthur Azizov

Arthur Azizov is the founder and Investor at B2 Ventures. Arthur is a seasoned entrepreneur with more than 15 years of experience in fintech and financial markets. He has invested in multiple projects, leading the way in financial technology innovation and reshaping how businesses interact with liquidity, trading, and payment services. Arthur’s entrepreneurial path began in 2007 with a payment terminal business, which gave him practical insight into financial systems. In 2008, he transitioned into professional trading, gaining experience in FX, futures, and stocks. This combination of business operations and trading knowledge laid the foundation for his next major venture, B2BROKER, which was established in 2014.

Read More

2025-07-09 12:38