Crypto Firms in Korea: From Outcasts to Tax-Cut-Snatching Startups? You Won’t Believe This!

by

Far from the tranquil fields painted by the indifferent sun, the venerable Ministry of Small-Medium Enterprises and Startups, like a brooding aristocrat in the dawn mist, stirred with purpose. Upon this somber July 9th, the Ministry, not without a quiver of bureaucratic poetry, declared a grand revision to its laws: crypto firms, long exiled, might soon enter the hallowed circle of venture companies, clutching in their trembling hands the promise of tax reductions and sundry benefits. Yes, the digital money-changers may swap their tatters for the soft velvet robe of a government-sanctioned startup. Imagine the irony—blockchain and bureaucracy, arm in awkward arm, tripping over each other towards prosperity.🤝

As the Ministry’s notice fluttered through the public like an uninvited letter on a dreary afternoon, it proposed amendments to the “Special Act on Promoting Venture Businesses”—though one wonders what’s so special about being promoted by an act, save for the existential ennui. Under this spectral revision, digital asset firms, yes—even those rent-seeking, code-wielding operators—could be freed from the ranks of the “banned,” where, alongside gambling dens and errant roulette wheels, they had been interned by society’s disapproving gaze. 🎰

The title “venture business” in Korea, much like the title of “young squire” in the old provinces, is not bestowed lightly. It brands its bearer with eligibility for government affection—official certification, subsidies, tax cuts, and the occasional financial support, though always conditional on the sly whims of investment and technological progress. Yet, before this new dawn, crypto folk were unceremoniously snubbed, relegated to banquet tables beside gamblers and fortune-tellers, forever denied their invitation to the bureaucratic waltz. 💃

Observe the ministry’s own words, delivered with that blend of sincerity and subtle self-parody only true officials master: “The amendment,” they opined, “will lead to the activation and expansion of the venture ecosystem and promote the fostering of the virtual asset industry.” One can almost hear the trembling hands, the draft of cool air across the ink-stained desk. If the bureaucratical heart beats, surely it beats for such activation!

Consider, as well, our cautionary fable: the saga of Dunamu, parent to Upbit, whose government-stripped status in 2018 left it gasping for legal breath, lighter by $18 million after being pounced upon by the insatiable corporate taxman. Bereft of subsidies, they trudged to court, only to taste the full bitterness of legal defeat. A Greek tragedy with less wine and more paperwork. 🍷📄

On Sudden Affection for the Crypto Proletariat

Enter President Lee Jae-myung, who, in a brisk flourish of executive ink last month, shepherded a cabal of pro-crypto reforms. His government, previously counting coins in silence, now chants hosannas to the blockchain. Lee has sworn to back digital assets anchored by the sturdy Korean Won and let the national pension fund—no less!—dip its toes in the $884 billion cryptocurrency pool. The bureaucracy, it seems, has discovered the thrill of digital roulette.

As rumors of spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs swirl about, and Lee’s administration dreams of lifting bans on crypto-backed ETFs before the year’s dying light, the staid corridors of power echo with the laughter of day-traders. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party, tireless as a Moscow winter, pushes for a nascent stablecoin law—“Basic Act on Digital Assets,” they call it, though nothing in Korean politics is ever truly basic. 📈🥲

And so, ever onward stumbles progress—sometimes with the eager shuffle of a startup, sometimes with the heavy sigh of a bureaucrat. In South Korea, the future now wears a digital mask and dreams, quietly, of tax exemptions. Should we dare to hope? Stranger things have been filed in triplicate.

Read More

2025-07-09 09:35