They’ve been makin’ some shrewd moves, this Rivian. Not always what you’d expect from these Silicon Valley types. And they’re fixin’ to launch a new vehicle, the R2, this year. Could be a game-changer, they say. But whether it will be, well, that’s the sixty-four-dollar question, ain’t it? Should a fella consider investin’ a few dollars, hopin’ for a return in 2026? Let’s have a look-see.
TSMC makes the chips for almost everyone. It’s a simple arrangement. You need a brain for your robot, you call TSMC. They control about 72% of the market. A large number. Jensen Huang, the man from Nvidia, said they’re the best. He would, wouldn’t he? Still, it’s hard to argue with results. They’re not inventing the future, exactly. They’re just… enabling it. And charging handsomely for the privilege.
One finds a certain elegance, a quiet defiance of the commonplace, in considering the Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI 1.27%). It is, if you will, a portfolio of whispers, a collection of yields emanating from corners of the globe most investors deem too…provincial. And yet, it is precisely in these overlooked locales that true value often resides.
Vargas, obsessed with the notion of ‘inverted ownership’ – possessing not the thing itself, but a claim upon a claim – argued that all financial instruments are, ultimately, elaborate exercises in deferred possession. SLV, in its attempt to mimic the price of silver bullion, represents the most direct iteration of this principle. It is a mirror held close to the metal, reflecting its fluctuations with a fidelity that borders on the tautological. SIL, conversely, is a reflection of a reflection – an investment not in silver, but in the companies that extract it from the earth. A more distant, and therefore, more complex, mirroring.
This GPM chap, according to a scribbled note sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission, decided he simply had to have more of these 2030 bonds. Seems he believes they’ll be rather tasty in a few years. A bit like burying acorns for the winter, only with slightly more paperwork.
It is in this spirit that one might turn a discerning eye towards Kimberly-Clark, a company which, while not possessing the dazzling allure of its more fashionable contemporaries, has demonstrated a remarkable consistency in fulfilling its obligations to its shareholders. That they have now raised their dividend for the fifty-fourth consecutive year is a testament not to extraordinary growth, but to a steadfast adherence to prudent management – a quality, alas, too often overlooked in the present pursuit of speculative gain.
Profitability, we are told, exceeded projections. Management offers guidance, increases capital returns, and paints a portrait of future prosperity. These are the rituals of the corporate temple, designed to soothe and distract. But a careful examination reveals a landscape far more complex, and far less reassuring. The cessation of federal EV credits at quarter’s end, conveniently positioned as an external factor, provides a convenient, if transparent, justification for any shortcomings.
The entire crypto sector is, shall we say, experiencing a period of… reassessment. A polite way of saying things aren’t exactly booming. But is XRP, the digital brainchild of Ripple, uniquely doomed? Or is it merely being dragged down by the general air of suspicion that seems to cling to anything involving blockchains and vaguely defined ‘decentralization’? It’s a bit like being at a party with one dodgy character—everyone gets a little uncomfortable, even the perfectly respectable guests.
Let us delve into the runes and charts, then, and see if this temporary setback presents an opportunity for the discerning investor. Or, to put it another way, is this a good time to acquire a slice of the digital realm?
The reduction, documented in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (a repository of such ephemeral decrees), shrinks GPM’s stake to a mere 0.13% of their total assets under management. A negligible quantity, one might argue, yet every subtraction, however small, alters the overall configuration. The quarter-end valuation of the BSCR position suffered a corresponding decline of $7.00 million, a convergence of trading activity and the relentless march of time. It is as if the fund itself is a phantom limb, slowly receding from the body of the investor.