Oklo: A Nuclear Folly?

by

The current unpleasantness in the Levant, as always, serves as a bracing reminder of our continued dependence on substances best left undisturbed. Artificial intelligence, that latest distraction, promises to exacerbate the strain on existing power grids, prompting a renewed, and frankly, rather desperate, interest in nuclear fission. Oklo (OKLO 3.64%), a company with ambitions exceeding its achievements, proposes to erect a series of miniature power plants, ‘powerhouses’ as they are euphemistically termed, commencing with a pilot project at the Idaho National Laboratory, scheduled, predictably, to open sometime in 2025.

A brief spasm of enthusiasm, fueled by the aforementioned AI mania, briefly inflated Oklo’s share price in the recent past. This, naturally, proved unsustainable. The stock now trades some 68% below its previous peak, a salutary lesson in the volatility of markets, and the folly of chasing novelties. One suspects the shareholders are beginning to feel a distinct chill, far colder than any generated by fission.

The question, therefore, is not whether Oklo could succeed, but whether a prudent investor should risk capital on such a venture.

Oklo: An Infant Among Giants

Oklo’s strategy, if one can call it that, involves attempting to control every aspect of the nuclear fuel cycle. They propose, in essence, to build and operate these ‘powerhouses,’ recycle the spent fuel (a task previously relegated to specialists), and even sell nuclear isotopes for various applications, from defense to, one imagines, the manufacture of glow-in-the-dark novelty items.

The Department of Energy, ever eager to distribute largesse, has granted Oklo access to its Reactor Pilot Program, a gesture which, while generous, does not necessarily equate to commercial viability. More recently, a deal with Meta Platforms to construct powerhouses in Ohio, capable of generating 1.2 gigawatts of electricity, has provided a much-needed infusion of capital. Meta, it seems, is willing to prepay for the energy, a testament either to its faith in Oklo, or a shrewd attempt to diversify its portfolio of speculative ventures.

It should be understood that nuclear projects are not built overnight. The Aurora powerhouse is not expected to begin operations until 2028, while the Ohio project will likely not reach full capacity until 2034. A decade, in the current climate, is a geological age.

Loading widget...

A Mistake at These Prices?

Despite the precipitous decline in its share price, Oklo still carries a market capitalization of roughly $9.4 billion. This, for a company that has yet to generate any meaningful revenue, is… optimistic. Analyst projections anticipate a paltry $0.1 million in revenue this year, rising to a slightly less paltry $3.3 million next year. By 2030, they foresee a more substantial $228 million, culminating in a truly impressive $1.1 billion in 2031.

The problem, of course, is the waiting. Investors are being asked to commit capital now, in anticipation of returns that are several years distant. And that assumes everything proceeds according to plan, which, in the realm of nuclear engineering, is a rather bold assumption. If Oklo does indeed achieve $1.1 billion in revenue in 2031, the stock will still trade at approximately 8.5 times that figure. A premium, one might say, for a company that is, at best, a hopeful prospect.

In short, buying Oklo at these prices requires a degree of faith that borders on credulity. It necessitates a belief in future deals, unforeseen breakthroughs, and a general disregard for the inherent risks involved. Only those with a particularly robust appetite for speculation, or a penchant for losing money, should consider it. For the rest of us, a polite decline would be the more sensible course.

Read More

2026-03-24 20:52