The prevailing narrative surrounding artificial intelligence stocks has, of late, taken on a distinctly muted tone. A pall, if you will, has descended upon the once-euphoric valuations. The market, it seems, is beginning to tally the costs, to discern the genuine signal from the manufactured hype. But to abandon the field entirely, to pronounce AI a spent force, would be a premature and, I suspect, a costly error. The question, then, is not whether to participate, but how to navigate this increasingly complex algorithmic archipelago.
The allure of Exchange Traded Funds – ETFs – remains potent. They offer a dilution of risk, a shielding against the capricious fortunes of individual enterprises. Yet, not all shields are forged of equal metal. Many, I’ve observed, are constructed with a concerning lack of discernment, offering a superficial exposure to the AI revolution while obscuring the true engines of its advancement.
The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is a familiar name, a stalwart of many portfolios. But its suitability as a vehicle for AI investment deserves rigorous scrutiny. It is a broad brush, painting with a palette that includes many colors, but lacking the precise hues required to capture the essence of this technological shift.
The Limitations of Broad Categorization
A review of VGT’s top holdings reveals a predictable concentration. Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft – the titans, undoubtedly – consume a disproportionate share of the fund’s capital, exceeding 43% in aggregate. While their involvement in AI is undeniable, to equate their dominance with a comprehensive exposure to the sector is a fundamental miscalculation. It is akin to charting a course to the Indies solely by the size of the flagship.
The more insidious flaw, however, lies in what VGT omits. Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and even Tesla – companies actively shaping the future of AI – are excluded, relegated to the periphery due to the arbitrary classifications of sector categorization. Amazon and Tesla, deemed “consumer discretionary,” and Alphabet and Meta, labeled “communication services” – these are bureaucratic distinctions that serve only to distort the true landscape of innovation. It is a taxonomy imposed from above, a system designed to contain, rather than to reveal.
The Cost of Incomplete Vision
The training and execution of AI models demand prodigious computational power, vast data storage, and resilient network infrastructure. These are the foundational necessities, the very bedrock upon which the entire edifice is built. To invest in AI without securing a stake in the providers of these essential services is to construct a castle upon sand. VGT, conspicuously, lacks substantial holdings in Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud – two of the largest and most critical cloud platforms globally.
AWS, in particular, is a leviathan, a silent engine powering countless applications and websites. Its outages, infrequent as they may be, serve as stark reminders of its central role in the modern digital ecosystem. To ignore its significance is to court disaster, to underestimate the fragility of our increasingly interconnected world. Alphabet, too, is evolving into an AI powerhouse, fueled by its Gemini model, custom AI chips, and its unparalleled reach through Search, YouTube, and a multitude of other services. And Meta, despite its public image, is making significant contributions to the development of open-source AI models, laying the groundwork for future innovations.
A More Prudent Course: The Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF
A more judicious approach, in my estimation, is to consider the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM). It mirrors the Nasdaq-100 index, encompassing the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. While not a “pure-play” AI ETF, it offers a more comprehensive and nuanced exposure to the sector, including the aforementioned hyperscalers that VGT so conspicuously omits.
A closer examination of QQQM’s top holdings reveals a more balanced and insightful allocation. Nvidia remains a significant component, but it is joined by Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Alphabet. This is not merely a collection of popular companies; it is a representative sample of the enterprises that are actively shaping the future of AI. Here’s a breakdown:
- Nvidia: 8.73%
- Apple: 7.35%
- Microsoft: 5.80%
- Amazon: 4.47%
- Tesla: 3.90%
- Meta Platforms: 3.60%
- Alphabet (Class A): 3.56%
- Alphabet (Class C): 3.30%
- Walmart: 3.28%
- Broadcom: 2.97%
By investing in QQQM, one gains exposure not only to the AI hyperscalers but also to companies across various sectors that are benefiting from or contributing to AI development. Walmart, for example, is leveraging AI to optimize its supply chain and enhance the customer experience. This is a more holistic approach, a recognition that AI is not confined to a single industry but is permeating every aspect of our lives.
The Nasdaq-100 has averaged over 18.5% annual total returns in the past decade (QQQM was established in 2020), outperforming both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite. While past performance is no guarantee of future results, this track record suggests that QQQM is well-positioned to continue delivering impressive returns as these companies expand their reach. It is a cautious optimism, a reasoned assessment based on empirical evidence. The algorithmic archipelago is treacherous, but with careful navigation, one can still chart a course towards prosperity.
Read More
- Can AI Lie with a Picture? Detecting Deception in Multimodal Models
- 20 Movies Where the Black Villain Was Secretly the Most Popular Character
- Top 10 Coolest Things About Invincible (Mark Grayson)
- 25 “Woke” Films That Used Black Trauma to Humanize White Leads
- Silver Rate Forecast
- 22 Films Where the White Protagonist Is Canonically the Sidekick to a Black Lead
- When AI Teams Cheat: Lessons from Human Collusion
- From Bids to Best Policies: Smarter Auto-Bidding with Generative AI
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Top 20 Dinosaur Movies, Ranked
2026-03-23 19:42