Trading close to its net asset value, it appeared the market was less inclined to shower this firm with the kind of exuberant premiums typically reserved for star-crossed investments.
After President Trump’s tariffs, the S&P 500 took a hit so dramatic it felt like a bad haircut. But then, like a determined tourist in a foreign city, it bounced back, adding 16% year to date. The economy, however, is less of a tourist and more of a person who’s lost their passport. Hiring has slowed, unemployment hit a four-year high, and I’m not sure if anyone’s still buying the “I Heart Tariffs” mug I got at a roadside stand in 2018.
Transaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($9.27); post-transaction value based on Dec. 11, 2025 market close ($9.27).
Now, dear reader, you might be thinking: “If the wizards bought dragons, should I buy dragon food?” Allow me to whisper in your ear like a suspicious character in a tavern:
The Presidential Election Cycle Theory, for instance, is based on data that shows that market performance in the latter two years of each president’s term has tended to outperform the first two years. It’s like a medieval knight’s quest: the first half is filled with battles, the second with feasts (if you’re lucky).
Recently, a bigwig from the Reserve Bank of India, Mr. T. Rabi Sankar, decided to throw a wet blanket on Bitcoin’s parade. His words stirred up more fuss than a monkey in a pipe factory.
Our favorite author of “Rich Dad Poor Dad,” Robert, took to his favorite soapbox-X (formerly Twitter)-to drop some wisdom bombs about how to endure the economic mess, with particular affection for getting your hands on assets that don’t mind crashing and burning. His advice? Think ahead, own things that generate cash, and get yourself some digital gold-yes, Bitcoin. Because what could possibly go wrong? 🤷♂️💻
Beta: A measure of how much your heartbeat quickens when you check it. Asset under management: The weight of everyone’s dreams, held prisoner in plastic.
Though their expense ratios-FTEC’s modest 0.08% against VGT’s 0.09%-suggest a rivalry of the most delicate sort, the disparity is trifling, akin to the difference between a pin’s placement in a gown. Their dividend yields, both hovering near 0.4%, might be likened to the careful balance of frugality and generosity in a household of means. Yet it is in the realm of assets under management that the distinction becomes most pronounced: VGT, with £130 billion to FTEC’s £16.7 billion, resembles the elder sister who has long since secured her place in society, while FTEC, though charming and well-connected, remains a younger lady with promising prospects.